We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Does this open the floodgates for counterclaims?
tradershads
Posts: 30 Forumite
Can people use this as a precedent to counterclaims:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce83n7j7p6po
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce83n7j7p6po
0
Comments
-
Not really, because the costs were for hiring representation. And a county court case doesn't set a precedent, it's just seen as persuasive.If you received a VCS charge for the exact same thing yourself you would just have a higher chance of winning and more chance of winning costs for unreasonable behaviour if you cited the case.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards