Northampton Railway Station Penalty Notice As Automated App Payment Didn't Work

ukixwoo

Hi. 

The driver parked in "Northampton Main" railway car park on 23/07/2025.  Despite being set-up on the "Trust" car parking app which is supposed to cover this car park and automatically pay the fees on exit, it failed to do so and a penalty notice dated 31/07/2025 has been received by the registered keeper from Saba Park Services Uk Limited.

Is that fact that the car in question was registered on the Trust app and should have been charged via that a valid reason for getting the notice cancelled please, and if so, what's the process to follow please?

Thanks. 

doubledotcom

You’ve received what Saba purports to be a “Penalty Notice” for an alleged breach of Railway Byelaw 14. Let’s be clear: this is not a lawful Penalty Notice in the statutory sense.

A genuine Penalty Notice under railway byelaws must be enforced via prosecution in the Magistrates’ Court under Byelaw 24(1). It cannot be “appealed” through POPLA or any private scheme. The mere offer of an appeal process is your first clue that this is not a statutory penalty but a civil demand masquerading as one.

Saba routinely undermines their own position by referencing a potential civil claim for breach of contract somewhere on the notice. That’s a fatal conflation. They cannot simultaneously claim a statutory breach under criminal law and threaten civil action for breach of contract. These are mutually exclusive legal frameworks.

What you’ve received is a Parking Charge Notice dressed up as a Penalty Notice—an unlawful hybrid designed to intimidate. It has no statutory backing and no lawful authority unless pursued through the courts. Personally, I treat these as attempted extortion under the Fraud Act 2006 and would not hesitate to report it to the police.

You are under no obligation to engage with their sham appeal process. If they believe a byelaw has been breached, they must prosecute. Anything less is bluff.

ukixwoo

doubledotcom said:

You’ve received what Saba purports to be a “Penalty Notice” for an alleged breach of Railway Byelaw 14. Let’s be clear: this is not a lawful Penalty Notice in the statutory sense.

A genuine Penalty Notice under railway byelaws must be enforced via prosecution in the Magistrates’ Court under Byelaw 24(1). It cannot be “appealed” through POPLA or any private scheme. The mere offer of an appeal process is your first clue that this is not a statutory penalty but a civil demand masquerading as one.

Saba routinely undermines their own position by referencing a potential civil claim for breach of contract somewhere on the notice. That’s a fatal conflation. They cannot simultaneously claim a statutory breach under criminal law and threaten civil action for breach of contract. These are mutually exclusive legal frameworks.

What you’ve received is a Parking Charge Notice dressed up as a Penalty Notice—an unlawful hybrid designed to intimidate. It has no statutory backing and no lawful authority unless pursued through the courts. Personally, I treat these as attempted extortion under the Fraud Act 2006 and would not hesitate to report it to the police.

You are under no obligation to engage with their sham appeal process. If they believe a byelaw has been breached, they must prosecute. Anything less is bluff.

Thanks. So the owner is safe to ignore it then ?

ukixwoo

This thread advises to appeal saying there's no keeper liability:-
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6560660/parking-charge-from-saba

ukixwoo

Any more advice please?  Should we ignore or appeal?

Coupon-mad

Either. Times out after 6 months anyway.

Is that fact that the car in question was registered on the Trust app and should have been charged via that a valid reason for getting the notice cancelled please, and if so, what's the process to follow please?

The process for appealing is different than most.  Here's a thread about SABA this week:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6624769/3-parking-parking-fines-railway-car-park-anpr-auto-renew-subscription-failure

kryten3000

Let me know if SABA try and morph this into a contractual charge.