Parking Control, Moorside court claim 2025

Liolion1987

Hey everyone,  i got question about my case...
Good evening,

Maybe is possible to get an extension for DQ 180form ? I had a surgery abroad was long recovery for me and I couldn't do a form on time. 

I filled DQ 5days late and that was too late..

I emailed Caseprogression.cnbc@justice.gov.uk
And i emailed parking control management aswell   
I send DQ on 25.10.25 but the court Send me lDQ on 22/09/2025
I read  somewhere  i can ask extension  for another 28 days,but don't know is it true or no? Or just need to pay full amount? Thank you guys!

Coupon-mad

But you have sent it so it's fine.

prowla

Liolion1987 said:

Hey just received an email from Moorside legal

Ouch - are they presenting themselves as representing the courts?

Coupon-mad

What a load of guff!

Liolion1987

Hi everyone, i today i have received witness statement from Parking Control Management (UK) Limited. Hearing date 10/11/2026.

I have copied defence response from them:

30. The Claimant asserts that the Defence filed is a template, which can be located on many of the internet forums online. These types of Defences are filed without any attempt to resolve the dispute but merely to frustrate matters further and the Defendant is put to strict proof of their understand and application of the complex case law and statute cited throughout, 31. As per the Order of Deput District Judge Piperdy dated 5 February 2026, the Claimant filed and served Further Particulars of Claim ("PoC") dated 24 February 2026, hereto exhibited at ("MHB7"), without the documentation to avoid duplication. 32. The Claimant asserts that the PoC exhibited at MHB7 are compliant with CPR 16.4 and Practice Direction 16. As such, any allegations of non-compliant PoC are rejected by the Claimant 33. The Claimant rejects the Defendant's application of ParkingEye -v- Beavis [2015] EXCA Civ 402. The case was settled at the Supreme Court and decided that parking charges such as this one serve a legitimate commercial purpose and therefore are not unenforceable, The Supreme Court did not consider charges such as these to be unfair 34. The Claimant rejects the Defendants application of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The signage in the photographs at MHB2 and MHB4 and around the images of the Defendant's vehicle clear evidence the terms of the contract, which the Defendant breached. The Claimant is satisfied that the signage is clear and unambiguous in its wording and the Defendant is put to strict proof to evidence otherwise. 35. The Claimant rejects the Defendant's allegations at paragraph 28, and asserts that they have an agreement with KADOE, which the Defendant is not party to nor would sight of the agreement assist in any Defence the Defendant wishes to bring. The Claimant has exhibited their right to enforce and manage parking on the Land by the Landowner, as per exhibit MHB1.

36. The Claimant asserts that the Notice to Keeper was POFA compliant, and the Defendant is being pursued as the registered keeper of the vehicle in question. If the Defendant was not the driver, then he ought to have known who the driver was given, this was his vehicle. The Defendant failed to nominate a driver and therefore he is being correctly pursued as the keeper. 37. The Claimant would reiterate paragraph 28 of this Witness Statement and confirm that the Code has not been enacted and cannot be applied retrospectively in any event. 38. The Claimant rejected any allegation of abuse of process or a waste of the courts resources The Claimant submits that the Defendant is the party not complying with the overriding objective and CPR 1 as he has filed a template defence with no dispute of liability but merely challenging procedural defects, which the Claimant rejects 39. The Claimant submits that the amended Particulars of Claim incorrectly plead a PCN balance of £170.00, as the additional costs incurred as per paragraph 25 of this Witness Statement were £60.00. Therefore, the Claimant respectfully requests that Judgment is entered as per the below.

I have planed operation in Germany 2 weeks after my court date and i want ask the court to proceed without me.

I'm writing the letter to court and claimant and its looks like this:

URGENT: Notice that the Defendant is unable to attend the hearing and request that the hearing proceed in his absence

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am the Defendant in the above claim. In accordance with the Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track (N157) dated 2 September 2026, I am giving the Court written notice that I am unable to attend the hearing on 10 November 2026 because of serious ill health.

I have been diagnosed with an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and aneurysm . I am currently experiencing headaches, dizziness, fatigue and my doctors have advised that I am not fit to attend court. I also require major surgery, planned for 25/11/2026 at .... .... .... I expect my condition to be worse after the operation, and I will need a period of recovery of approximately 6months.

I do not wish to delay the proceedings. My Defence has already been filed [on date], [together with my directions questionnaire, witness statement and supporting documents, if applicable]. I respectfully ask the Court to proceed with the hearing in my absence and to take my Defence and the documents I have filed fully into account, as the notice provides.

My absence is due solely to my medical condition and is not a lack of engagement with the claim.
If the Judge considers that the claim cannot fairly be decided in my absence, I would ask that the Court consider the attached medical evidence before making any order that is adverse to me, and I respectfully ask to be informed so that I can respond.

Can i add something else for the court and claimant ?

Is my defence not good how they said in witness statement? Or its just normal claimant procedure in witness statement?

Thank you everyone

Le_Kirk

They always claim the defence is a template but then go on to use a template of their own. Don't worry about that.

Coupon-mad

"I have planed operation in Germany 2 weeks after my court date and i want ask the court to proceed without me."


Oh dear. You'll almost certainly lose then.

Errrm…have you filed and served your WS and evidence as the Hearing Order told you to? And as the NEWBIES thread explains, with a whole list of recommended exhibits there for you.

Liolion1987

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/82178977#Comment_82178977

Hi @Coupon-mad yes i filled WS today. I didn't mention anything about Germany.. thanks again!

Coupon-mad

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/82179900#Comment_82179900

Oh dear again.

Two things:

• you didn't ask for our input into your WS, so did you follow what the NEWBIES thread says about WS stage and made sure you pulled apart their WS and pointed out deficiencies with their evidence and included all the usual list of exhibits and cc'd in the solicitors to your bundle?
• If you genuinely cannot attend the hearing then you MUST urgently email the court - with the hearing date/time and Claim number in the subject line along with a message in the body of the email saying that you are (the Defendant) unable to attend this hearing due to working in Germany (attach proof of that) and ask the judge to 'please decide in my absence based on my submissions' - to exempt your attendance.

…it does make it highly likely you will lose though, so I hope you have changed your plans!

MrJenkinsEsq

Can you share the signs, any site plans, and landowner agreement they have exhibited in their witness statement, along with the exhibit numbers?

What were the revised particulars of claim, verbatim?