We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PCN Received from Private Car Park - Incorrect Signage
Options

Cyber_Knight
Posts: 2 Newbie

Good Morning!
Just looking for a little advice on this one from anyone who have a little experience in this regard.
I have received a PCN for when my car stayed at a private car park in York last month. The signage showed that an app called "Hozah" could be used to automatically pay for the charges, and my car was already set up with this app from other car parks used previously.
We have a photo of the signage taken on the day, which shows this.
I have received a PCN stating that charges were not paid, and so i contacted Hozah to ask why their app hadn't worked. They told us that their app stopped operating in that car park 2 months prior.
We appealed the PCN with the issuing company (Minster Baywatch), with the photos of the signage and emails from Hozah, showing the incorrect signage.
The appeal has just been rejected by the issuing company stating that the photo could have been taken at any time when the Hozah app was an accepted payment method. And have insisted that we pay the fine. (I feel the result would have been the same even if there was a date on the photo as they would have just accused us of adding it in photoshop or something).
At this point i just wanted to check that we have a case here to take further to the Independent Tribunal that they should be giving us a code for / and if this is the correct next step? It appeared like an open / shut case when we made the appeal and would be more than happy to just pay the charge we would have owed on the day, if their signage had been correct.
I just cant believe we are being considered at fault, when their sign was clearly, and proven to be wrong.
Just looking for a little advice on this one from anyone who have a little experience in this regard.
I have received a PCN for when my car stayed at a private car park in York last month. The signage showed that an app called "Hozah" could be used to automatically pay for the charges, and my car was already set up with this app from other car parks used previously.
We have a photo of the signage taken on the day, which shows this.
I have received a PCN stating that charges were not paid, and so i contacted Hozah to ask why their app hadn't worked. They told us that their app stopped operating in that car park 2 months prior.
We appealed the PCN with the issuing company (Minster Baywatch), with the photos of the signage and emails from Hozah, showing the incorrect signage.
The appeal has just been rejected by the issuing company stating that the photo could have been taken at any time when the Hozah app was an accepted payment method. And have insisted that we pay the fine. (I feel the result would have been the same even if there was a date on the photo as they would have just accused us of adding it in photoshop or something).
At this point i just wanted to check that we have a case here to take further to the Independent Tribunal that they should be giving us a code for / and if this is the correct next step? It appeared like an open / shut case when we made the appeal and would be more than happy to just pay the charge we would have owed on the day, if their signage had been correct.
I just cant believe we are being considered at fault, when their sign was clearly, and proven to be wrong.
0
Comments
-
They're wrong, you're right. Others will be along to advise on the next step but will likely ask you to post a copy of the PCN here making sure any name/address/reg number are blanked out.I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe, Old Style Money Saving and Pensions boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
Click on this link for a Statement of Accounts that can be posted on the DebtFree Wannabe board: https://lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.php
Check your state pension on: Check your State Pension forecast - GOV.UK
"Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.” Nellie McClung
⭐️🏅😇2 -
Yes, post redacted pictures of both sides of the pcn, no personal information or references or VRM details etc, leaving the dates showing
Post any signage pictures etc too
Were the signs on site headed as Minster Baywatch ? Or as Bransby Wilson ?
Did MB give you a popla code ?
Did you reveal who was driving in your appeal ?1 -
Please see the requested info below.
In the appeal I just referred to who was driving as "The Driver". Kept it very formal. I didn't go into the specifics of who was driving.
(The cars registered to me, with my wife who was the driver on that day, registered as an additional driver on the insurance)
0 -
Signage Bransby Wilson
Claimant is Minster Baywatch on the NTK PCN letter
No invitation for the keeper to pay
You didn't answer all the questions
Did MB give you a popla code ?
They didn't state that the parking fee wasn't paid !
They stated that the parking fee wasn't paid IN FULL , which would have been £12
so was any actual payment paid and received by BW or MB etc ?
2 -
This will be easy to win at POPLA.
Search the forum for:
Bransby POPLA
...and copy/adapt a POPLA appeal that won re the fact the contract isn't offered by MB. Also add the photo of the sign showing Hozah as an option, but this time embed it into your word doc (then saved as a PDF) as a screenshot, so the metadata shows!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
You can obtain metadata from photos if you Google it. You can tell Minster to upload the file to a metadata site, which makes their refusal unreasonable. They have 7 days or else you'll go to POPLA. And that their refusal, and all this evidence will be used in any court claim in order
to obtain costs.1 -
Typical PPC wriggling in addition to all this, it is a "Material Change" which should by the joint COP have been signed for up to four months after the Hozah link was terminated but PPC's as usual don't update their signage and use this as entrapment.3.4. Material changes – noticesWhere there is any material change to any pre-existing terms and conditions that would not
be immediately apparent to a driver entering controlled land that is or has been open for
public parking, the parking operator must place additional (temporary) notices at the site
entrance for a period of not less than 4 months from the date of the change making it clear
that new terms and conditions/charges apply, such that regular visitors who might be
familiar with the old terms do not inadvertently incur parking charges.
3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards