We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Building concerns
FunLovinCriminal
Posts: 481 Forumite
Good afternoon
I wonder if you can offer some advice please.
We bought a property in 2008. We remortgaged in 2012 with a new mortgage provider and the new mortgage company asked to look in our loft. Upon their inspection they saw that the struts in the loft had been removed by the previous owners to make the loft an extra room. They recommended us to get a joiner to replace them. We did this in 2012 and assumed everything was all fine.
Today we had a joiner out on a separate issue. He thinks the previous joiner has not done an adequate job, and recommended a structural engineer to inspect it.
We have concerns now on what to do. Are we able to claim through home insurance? Are we even covered?
Any advice for a concerned FLC?
Any advice for a concerned FLC?
Mortgage: 01/02/14 - £108k
Mortgage: Current - £97k
Mission: MF by 50
Mortgage: Current - £97k
Mission: MF by 50
0
Comments
-
Home Insurance may cover legal fees should you try and sue the previous joiner - but I suspect that they will not cover for repairs to damage you instigated yourself.1
-
May be picking you up wrong, not looking at suing joiner, and we didnt damage the property ourselves, we tried to fix with a joiner.DE_612183 said:Home Insurance may cover legal fees should you try and sue the previous joiner - but I suspect that they will not cover for repairs to damage you instigated yourself.
Our concern is a bill for a structural engineer and the repair work.
And that we are not insured
And that if we cannot afford the repair, we cannot claim on the insurance as we are not covered due to a) not declaring what the previous owner and mortgage advisor did/saw
b) repair work not up to standard
We have remortgaged twice since then, neither provider sent anyone around to the house.
Mortgage: 01/02/14 - £108k
Mortgage: Current - £97k
Mission: MF by 500 -
I doubt if home insurance would cover the cost of a structural engineer - although you could ask.0
-
they saw that the struts in the loft had been removed by the previous owners to make the loft an extra room. They recommended us to get a joiner to replace them. We did this in 2012 and assumed everything was all fine.
So was the loft being used as an actual extra room? Or do you mean they were removed to make a bit of extra room?
0 -
I assume they were trying to do a loft conversion kids handprints on the walls, carpet on the floor, struts removed so they wouldnt hit their heads etc. But sold it before completing the "project"Albermarle said:they saw that the struts in the loft had been removed by the previous owners to make the loft an extra room. They recommended us to get a joiner to replace them. We did this in 2012 and assumed everything was all fine.
So was the loft being used as an actual extra room? Or do you mean they were removed to make a bit of extra room?Mortgage: 01/02/14 - £108k
Mortgage: Current - £97k
Mission: MF by 500 -
what did your surveyor say about the roof/loft when you bought the house?This is an open forum, anyone can post and I just did !1
-
Nothing was mentioned. It was only when we changed mortgage provider was anything mentionedMortgage: 01/02/14 - £108k
Mortgage: Current - £97k
Mission: MF by 500 -
A proper loft conversion is a serious construction project.FunLovinCriminal said:
I assume they were trying to do a loft conversion kids handprints on the walls, carpet on the floor, struts removed so they wouldnt hit their heads etc. But sold it before completing the "project"Albermarle said:they saw that the struts in the loft had been removed by the previous owners to make the loft an extra room. They recommended us to get a joiner to replace them. We did this in 2012 and assumed everything was all fine.
So was the loft being used as an actual extra room? Or do you mean they were removed to make a bit of extra room?
Architect/ structural surveyor/ experienced builder etc
It’s not just about taking a few struts out.
0 -
It stayed upright for 4 years without the struts & another 13 years with the replacement struts. It’s unlikely it’s going anywhere.0
-
That unfortunately, is poor thinking. It could be that some of the timbers are under excessive loads and right on the cusp of failure. A high wind hitting in just the right direction could be all that is needed. Or a small earthquake may be just enough to trigger a collapse - And yes, we do get earthquakes in the UK -> https://www.earthquakes.bgs.ac.uk/education/faqs/faq6.htmlHHarry said:It stayed upright for 4 years without the struts & another 13 years with the replacement struts. It’s unlikely it’s going anywhere.
Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

