📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Informing insurers of repairs, self-paid?

Options
PunkRoquefort
PunkRoquefort Posts: 101 Forumite
Second Anniversary 10 Posts
Do you tell your insurers of any bumps/scrapes/repairs which you have paid for yourself and not claimed for.

I have recently had a claim/repairs and during the phone call, was asked and said I had also had a minor bump, paid by myself.

They still required details, as it builds up a picture of my driving.

Comments

  • Brie
    Brie Posts: 14,791 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    All incidents/accidents need to be reported to your insurance no matter how a claim is handled (or not).  To not do so may invalidate the policy.

    My understanding is that if you had a relatively minor bump you may not be aware of some of the damage and it may not be repaired.  Then you have a bigger bump and it becomes something really major due to some issue from the first bump.

    That all said, I doubt more than about 5% of the population reports every single tiny bump/scrape.  I didn't report anything when I scraped my car against my neighbour's fence post (no damage to the post, small bit of missing paint from my car).  I also didn't report the almost accident when a chap came too fast out of a side street and "almost" hit my car.  Well he did in fact hit it but it was a case of him swerving and just clipping my wing mirror.  Again - just a bit of paint missing so no issue.   
    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe, Old Style Money Saving and Pensions boards.  If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.

    Click on this link for a Statement of Accounts that can be posted on the DebtFree Wannabe board:  https://lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.php

    Check your state pension on: Check your State Pension forecast - GOV.UK

    "Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.”  Nellie McClung
    ⭐️🏅😇
  • sheslookinhot
    sheslookinhot Posts: 2,289 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    So you are stating that ALL  incidents / accidents need to be reported to the insurance company, yet then confirming you never reported to your insurance 2 incidents of your own ? 

    Perhaps you should not be telling people to be reporting minor incidents when no third party is involved.


    Mortgage free
    Vocational freedom has arrived
  • paul_c123
    paul_c123 Posts: 540 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Do you tell your insurers of any bumps/scrapes/repairs which you have paid for yourself and not claimed for.

    I have recently had a claim/repairs and during the phone call, was asked and said I had also had a minor bump, paid by myself.

    They still required details, as it builds up a picture of my driving.
    Are you sure it wasn't previous damage on the car before you bought it, that you've recently noticed and decided to repair for cosmetic reasons?
  • ohreallƳ
    ohreallƳ Posts: 39 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    I would think twice before disclosing this information. 

    As @paul_c123 suggests, wasn't the damage pre-existing and only noticed post purchased and self repaired.
  • MyRealNameToo
    MyRealNameToo Posts: 433 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    So you are stating that ALL  incidents / accidents need to be reported to the insurance company, yet then confirming you never reported to your insurance 2 incidents of your own ? 

    Perhaps you should not be telling people to be reporting minor incidents when no third party is involved.
    A case of do as I say not as I do.

    Ultimately the requirement is that you report all cases. The reality is that people dont however plenty of people have found themselves facing massive bills when the insurer finds out about minor incidents that haven't been declared when a major loss occurs. 
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,761 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    So you are stating that ALL  incidents / accidents need to be reported to the insurance company, yet then confirming you never reported to your insurance 2 incidents of your own ? 

    Perhaps you should not be telling people to be reporting minor incidents when no third party is involved.


    Read the terms, 99.9% it will say to inform them. Third party involvement is irrelevant - think about it from their side, person X is a bad driver who hits things and causes damage, they need to calculate this in their premiums for the time person X hits something expensive

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • sheslookinhot
    sheslookinhot Posts: 2,289 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Nasqueron said:
    So you are stating that ALL  incidents / accidents need to be reported to the insurance company, yet then confirming you never reported to your insurance 2 incidents of your own ? 

    Perhaps you should not be telling people to be reporting minor incidents when no third party is involved.


    Read the terms, 99.9% it will say to inform them. Third party involvement is irrelevant - think about it from their side, person X is a bad driver who hits things and causes damage, they need to calculate this in their premiums for the time person X hits something expensive
    Perhaps you have quoted the wrong person. I was merely pointing out the inconsistencies with a response to the OP.

    Third party involvement is not irrelevant.
    Mortgage free
    Vocational freedom has arrived
  • Grey_Critic
    Grey_Critic Posts: 1,523 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The question really is how good were the self paid repairs? Had a case of a Rear Bumper falling off after a minor rear end shunt and a back street repair.  Investigation showed it had a prior repair due to a rear end shunt. Had repainted it but not removed and checked bumper mountings which had cracked. The second repair was refused by the insurer.
    I had a warranty repair on a Ford Escort where they [ointed out a prior repair to the door. As it happened the warranty repair was npt effected. 
    We get lots of posts on here over time about prior problems so the insurers are no different - why should they pay for shoddy workmanship
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,761 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Nasqueron said:
    So you are stating that ALL  incidents / accidents need to be reported to the insurance company, yet then confirming you never reported to your insurance 2 incidents of your own ? 

    Perhaps you should not be telling people to be reporting minor incidents when no third party is involved.


    Read the terms, 99.9% it will say to inform them. Third party involvement is irrelevant - think about it from their side, person X is a bad driver who hits things and causes damage, they need to calculate this in their premiums for the time person X hits something expensive
    Perhaps you have quoted the wrong person. I was merely pointing out the inconsistencies with a response to the OP.

    Third party involvement is not irrelevant.
    I quoted your post saying

    "Perhaps you should not be telling people to be reporting minor incidents when no third party is involved."

    I am aware you are pointing out the hypocrisy but it still needs to be made clear as that statement could be misunderstood 

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.