We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Forced to do extra work for no pay?

Options
Hi all, 

Asking for a friend. she has worked for a cleaning company for 4 years cleaning two large warehouses and offices a night. She is on a PAYE contract and paid minimum wage 

She has just recieved a call from the office saying they will no longer be paying a contractor to collect and clean the 700-800 microfibre clothes she uses a month and they have told her she has to take them home and wash and dry them herself as "everyone else" cleans their own apparently ( domestic cleaners who are self employed, not commercial sites ) 

Surley they can not make her do this? Any advice is welcomed 

Thankyou 


«1

Comments

  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,998 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 26 July at 12:09PM
    Look for another job. 
    Certainly not something I would be agreeing to as an employee. 

    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Undervalued
    Undervalued Posts: 9,573 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 26 July at 12:39PM
    Litten888 said:
    Hi all, 

    Asking for a friend. she has worked for a cleaning company for 4 years cleaning two large warehouses and offices a night. She is on a PAYE contract and paid minimum wage 

    She has just recieved a call from the office saying they will no longer be paying a contractor to collect and clean the 700-800 microfibre clothes she uses a month and they have told her she has to take them home and wash and dry them herself as "everyone else" cleans their own apparently ( domestic cleaners who are self employed, not commercial sites ) 

    Surley they can not make her do this? Any advice is welcomed 

    Thankyou 


    Legally, almost certainly not. So, in theory if she were to refuse and as a result they were to dismiss her she would have a strong claim for unfair dismissal.

    That said, is this a route she is prepared to go down? Is the employer generally a sound and responsible  company? Or is it a dodgy "fly by night" sort of operation where getting any redress (regardless of the legal position) is going to be a real battle?

    Start with a polite expression of her unwillingness to do this (either at all or without appropriate extra pay) and see what happens.

    As @elsien has suggested, also look for a better job elsewhere!
  • This will be illegal as it will take her below the minimum wage.
    0 bonus saver
    35 NS&I
    290 credit union

    Credit card 1 2218
    Credit card 2 499
    Overdraft 221
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 22,491 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    Does she have a contract?
  • ohreallƳ
    ohreallƳ Posts: 22 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 26 July at 8:46PM
    She only has domestic laundering facilities and they're not suitable for commercial use.  Moving beyond this attempting to force the issue potentially opens a different can of worms; insurance, this use may be problematic with her domestic insurer as her home is now become a place of work; now its under the scope of in-service inspection and testing, the inspector should record that the laundering assets are unsuitable for commercial work and fail them (fit for purpose).

    As her home is now a workplace there should be a risk assessment conducted, its required to be suitable and sufficient. Perhaps @dickydonkin may lookin and offer a though on the matter.

    Run it by me again, everyone else is doing this, why?  Are the daft?
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 22,491 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    ohreallƳ said:
    She only has domestic laundering facilities and they're not suitable for commercial use.  Moving beyond this attempting to force the issue potentially opens a different can of worms; insurance, this use may be problematic with her domestic insurer as her home is now become a place of work; now its under the scope of in-service inspection and testing, the inspector should record that the laundering assets are unsuitable for commercial work and fail them (fit for purpose).

    As her home is now a workplace there should be a risk assessment conducted, its required to be suitable and sufficient. Perhaps @dickydonkin may lookin and offer a though on the matter.

    Run it by me again, everyone else is doing this, why?  Are the daft?
    The others are self employed so it will probably be part of their contract. 


  • SiliconChip
    SiliconChip Posts: 1,826 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    At the moment are the cloths just thrown away after a single use? If so then that seems like an awful waste, both of goods and money, so you can see why the employer would want to have them washed and reused. The issue is that they way they want to do it is unreasonable, and as pointed out illegal from a NMW persepective.
    So the employer either needs to pay the cleaner for the time they spend doing the wash (and the cost of electricity, detergent, wear and tear on the machine, drying, etc.) or arrange for somebody else to collect the cloths (perhaps along with those used by other employed cleaners if there are any), clean them and return them for resuse. As neither thing is likely to happen then a new job might well be the best solution.
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,998 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If you read the  OP, the employer has been paying a contractor to clean the cloths but is no longer willing to do so. Pushing that cost back onto the employee is not okay.
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,266 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ohreallƳ said:

    Run it by me again, everyone else is doing this, why?  Are the daft?
    I read the comment "everyone is doing it" as referring to self employed sole-trader cleaners working in people's houses.  Those cleaners have to provide and launder whatever cloths there are.

    The OP is not a sole-trader, AIUI, but working as a PAYE employee.  The appropriate laundry falls to the employer to manage.  
  • SiliconChip
    SiliconChip Posts: 1,826 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    elsien said:
    If you read the  OP, the employer has been paying a contractor to clean the cloths but is no longer willing to do so. Pushing that cost back onto the employee is not okay.

    You're right, I missed that, and I agree that it's not OK to make the employee pay (which is what I'd already said).
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.