Advice needed for DCB Legal - Letter of Claim

Splendid_Lemon

Right you are. Does this tweak cover it? 

 3. The Defendant denies being the driver of the vehicle and therefore denies any liability for the alleged breach described as “overstay” in the Particulars of Claim. The Defendant did not receive a Notice to Keeper (NTK) and was not made aware of the specific details of the alleged contravention until after responding to the Claimant’s Letter of Claim. The NTK was only seen once it was emailed in response to the Defendant’s enquiries and was not properly served in accordance with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.  The Claimant also misrepresented the date of the Defendant’s response to the Letter of Claim, thereby denying any extension. The Defendant made reasonable attempts to contact the Claimant upon receiving debt collection letters, but no contact details were available via the Claimant’s website. As the registered keeper only, and in the absence of a properly served NTK, the Defendant cannot be held liable under POFA and respectfully requests that the claim be dismissed.

Coupon-mad

Yep. That'll do!

Hope you haven't forgotten about the Public Consultation I posted about on page one of your thread though? We need everyone.

Splendid_Lemon

Thank you for all the help and for all the resources you've provided.

I've not forgotten about the public consultation no, it's currently part completed and I will revisit as soon as I have a moment. 

Thanks again.

👍