CNBC claim form defence - new thread for second claim

renlitai

Hi, 
Thanks for all your help on the last one, I have submitted the defence. This is the second court claim, from the same car park, and a year previous but this time it is DCB legal who have requested judgement. Although I am not sure why they're different, does this change anything with the defence? As again, other than accidentally overstaying whilst assisting my relative who was bedbound from a back injury, I have no real defence that I can truthfully argue as I didnt even open the letters after receiving the first one. 
Whereas the previous claim I completed the response pack, I have not done so with this and have done the AOS, will now need to write my defence. In total the charges from the two claim forms are around £700, which is just outrageous. 

Coupon-mad

Same as your other defence but add in the words about Henderson v Henderson from other defences (search the forum). 

renlitai

Coupon-mad said:

Same as your other defence but add in the words about Henderson v Henderson from other defences (search the forum). 

Thank you. I really do appreciate your time! 

renlitai

renlitai said:

Coupon-mad said:

Same as your other defence but add in the words about Henderson v Henderson from other defences (search the forum). 

Thank you. I really do appreciate your time! 

Hey just about to submit this second defence, and i just wanted to confirm with adding the words from HvH, particularly the first sentence which says ''The court is also invited to take note that the claimant has issued two current claims, numbers XXXXX and XXXXX'' ... For this part, do I use both of the claim numbers issued by CNBC or the specific parking fine 'PCN' number? 

Coupon-mad

You state the two Claim Numbers.