We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gov launching pension age review
Options

Juno_Moneta
Posts: 161 Forumite


Here we go… as long as they don’t touch the upcoming in 2028 change to age 57 for SIPP access rule I don’t care what they do with the state pension age… but appreciate others might.
“Government revives landmark Pensions Commission”
“Alongside the Commission, the Government has, as required by law, also launched the State Pension Age Review, commissioning two independent reports for Government to consider when deciding the State Pension age for future decades.”
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-revives-landmark-pensions-commission-to-confront-retirement-crisis-that-risks-tomorrows-pensioners-being-poorer-than-todays
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-revives-landmark-pensions-commission-to-confront-retirement-crisis-that-risks-tomorrows-pensioners-being-poorer-than-todays
0
Comments
-
I expect the review will give two options, increase contributions or increase pension age, the government will choose the latter and it will get phased up to 69 over the next decade or two. If the pension age increases then so will SIPP access, but I doubt anything will be implemented by 2028.3
-
Not a fan of this at all. Won't affect me as getting state pension - I hope the new 16/17 voting cohort look for a party which won't do this.1
-
Personally I don’t think I will ever see a state pension. So I am planning for that outcome. Does make me quite bitter though. Over 30 years of National Insurance Contributions…4
-
Something has gone wrong with the maths in that release. It warns future retirees will get 8% or £800 pa less than current ones - which implies that the current average is £10k pa. But it also says that women get £100 a week now vs £200 a week for men.
So it looks like they have ignored women entirely and just worked out the likely decrease for men. Cue chorus of 'No surprise there.'1 -
BlackKnightMonty said:Personally I don’t think I will ever see a state pension. So I am planning for that outcome. Does make me quite bitter though. Over 30 years of National Insurance Contributions…
Fully replacing the state pension with an equivalent private pension would require individuals to save an additional £0.25m through to retirement. That may not be unreasonable for those planning with 40 years to go but it would be completely unreasonable for those closer to retirement. The government would also face an issue encouraging people to make personal provision for retirement if, by doing so, the £0.25m state pension was taken from them. This is what makes it unlikely any government will completely remove the state pension.0 -
Lowtrawler said:BlackKnightMonty said:Personally I don’t think I will ever see a state pension. So I am planning for that outcome. Does make me quite bitter though. Over 30 years of National Insurance Contributions…
Fully replacing the state pension with an equivalent private pension would require individuals to save an additional £0.25m through to retirement. That may not be unreasonable for those planning with 40 years to go but it would be completely unreasonable for those closer to retirement. The government would also face an issue encouraging people to make personal provision for retirement if, by doing so, the £0.25m state pension was taken from them. This is what makes it unlikely any government will completely remove the state pension.1 -
I am 45, and think it will be at least 70 before my age can access state pension.
Its definately a political grenade, especially with all the government F-ups which we all have to foot the bill for, and the ever increasing population increase.
You would think with higher population, this would lead to higher tax income, and therefore help to pay for the state pension, unless of course the population increase isnt contributing to the system.1 -
BlackKnightMonty said:Lowtrawler said:BlackKnightMonty said:Personally I don’t think I will ever see a state pension. So I am planning for that outcome. Does make me quite bitter though. Over 30 years of National Insurance Contributions…
Fully replacing the state pension with an equivalent private pension would require individuals to save an additional £0.25m through to retirement. That may not be unreasonable for those planning with 40 years to go but it would be completely unreasonable for those closer to retirement. The government would also face an issue encouraging people to make personal provision for retirement if, by doing so, the £0.25m state pension was taken from them. This is what makes it unlikely any government will completely remove the state pension.
Non-taxpayers get all their state pension, basic rate tax payers get 80% of theirs and so on.I am an Independent Financial Adviser. Any comments I make here are intended for information / discussion only. Nothing I post here should be construed as advice. If you are looking for individual financial advice, please contact a local Independent Financial Adviser.12 -
Probably the Govt would prefer to modify the Triple Lock to reduce its cost, rather than increase the state pension age.
However the latter is probably least politically damaging of the two, although anything that affects the State Pension is always very politically toxic, so they might shy away from doing anything in the end.2 -
HappyHarry said:BlackKnightMonty said:Lowtrawler said:BlackKnightMonty said:Personally I don’t think I will ever see a state pension. So I am planning for that outcome. Does make me quite bitter though. Over 30 years of National Insurance Contributions…
Fully replacing the state pension with an equivalent private pension would require individuals to save an additional £0.25m through to retirement. That may not be unreasonable for those planning with 40 years to go but it would be completely unreasonable for those closer to retirement. The government would also face an issue encouraging people to make personal provision for retirement if, by doing so, the £0.25m state pension was taken from them. This is what makes it unlikely any government will completely remove the state pension.
Non-taxpayers get all the state pension, basic rate tax payers get 80% of it and so on.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards