We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Recently purchased used car with faulty clutch - my rights
Comments
-
Six months is simply the tipping point between the onus of proof.ChrisMckay2501 said:Would this not fall under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, in that the garage would need to prove the clutch was in good working order when the car was sold to me, as I'm well within the 6 month time frame outlined by the Act?
Within that time, the onus lies on the vendor to demonstrate that the issue was not present at the time of sale. Outside that, the onus is on the buyer to demonstrate it was.
You've had 1,200 miles and three months of the clutch behaving itself just fine, before sudden and total failure.
It's not as if it'd been slipping or sticking during that time.0 -
You need to have it checked to find out why it failed. It should be obvious whether it's a manufacturing fault or wear.
i had a Volvo clutch replaced under goodwill after it failed without warning after 5 years and 30k miles. They said there was little wear and it appeared to be a defect in the clutch'fingers'.
if it's faulty but some wear is present, they may ask for a contribution from you.0 -
The real problem is you have no idea how the car has been driven in the past.0
-
My mother would get through at least two clutches a year because she drove with her left foot resting on the pedal.Grey_Critic said:The real problem is you have no idea how the car has been driven in the past.1 -
..and when all is said an done, you are dealing with Arnold Clark!!!!.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."0
-
I don't suppose anyone knows that except perhaps the previous owners, and they're not going to tell.Grey_Critic said:The real problem is you have no idea how the car has been driven in the past.
Fortunately, how it was driven in the past does not matter. All that matters for the CRA is whether at the point of sale the vehicle conformed to contract.
There is an implied contract term that the car is in reasonable working order for its age, mileage and price.
If you can show that some components were faulty or excessively worn and were due to fail prematurely, the seller was in breach of contract and you have a claim.
If the failure is due to factors since purchase such as wear and tear or abuse by the current driver then not so much.
You need that diagnosis.0 -
There was no indication at all of the clutch behaving irregularly, up until the point of failure.Mildly_Miffed said:
Six months is simply the tipping point between the onus of proof.ChrisMckay2501 said:Would this not fall under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, in that the garage would need to prove the clutch was in good working order when the car was sold to me, as I'm well within the 6 month time frame outlined by the Act?
Within that time, the onus lies on the vendor to demonstrate that the issue was not present at the time of sale. Outside that, the onus is on the buyer to demonstrate it was.
You've had 1,200 miles and three months of the clutch behaving itself just fine, before sudden and total failure.
It's not as if it'd been slipping or sticking during that time.
They have the car in and are in the process of stripping the gear box now. I will see what the findings of this are, then see if I have any options available.1 -
There rarely is.ChrisMckay2501 said:
There was no indication at all of the clutch behaving irregularly, up until the point of failure.Mildly_Miffed said:
Six months is simply the tipping point between the onus of proof.ChrisMckay2501 said:Would this not fall under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, in that the garage would need to prove the clutch was in good working order when the car was sold to me, as I'm well within the 6 month time frame outlined by the Act?
Within that time, the onus lies on the vendor to demonstrate that the issue was not present at the time of sale. Outside that, the onus is on the buyer to demonstrate it was.
You've had 1,200 miles and three months of the clutch behaving itself just fine, before sudden and total failure.
It's not as if it'd been slipping or sticking during that time.1 -
If it was the clutch, once the gearbox is off, the problem should be visible. If they are stripping the gearbox, then that is where the fault lies. Depending on the vehicle.ChrisMckay2501 said:There was no indication at all of the clutch behaving irregularly, up until the point of failure.
They have the car in and are in the process of stripping the gear box now. I will see what the findings of this are, then see if I have any options available.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards