PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Section 13 query

Options
Thank you all in advance. I hope you can provide me with an answer to my post as i'm struggling to clarify what I need to do or not next.

My letting agent tried to serve a section 13 in April 2025 raising my rent from 650 to 695 I contacted them to inform them that it was invalid as it was only 10 months since they served me with the last one. They withdrew the notice.

They have now tried this again proposing an increase from mid June, they have served by email only not via postage and the information on the section 13 in regard to the rent wise is inaccurate, this one states that my current rent is 695 (it isnt) and they propose a rise to 750 a month. 

I have not yet responded to this as frankly I am tired of their incompetence and dont want to help them by pointing out their errors only for them to serve it again but my questions are.

Could this get through if I dont dispute it? I believe that it would be thrown out if they tried to serve as the information on the notice regarding current rent is inaccurate.

Also as they have attempted to serve 2 of these now would it be valid anyway as I read that only one can be served a year. I dont know if this means one successful section 13 or it also applies to one which is thrown out due to inaccuracies.

Any help would be appreciated.

Comments

  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,708 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Do nothing until tribunal write to you.  Otherwise you are prompting them to get it right quicker.

    Good luck 
  • FlorayG
    FlorayG Posts: 2,208 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I would keep paying the rent you have originally agreed to and ignore the notice, let them find out it's invalid due to being inaccurate. If you can hold them off until the new RR bill becomes law they won't be able to increase by £100 a month then
  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    FlorayG said:
     If you can hold them off until the new RR bill becomes law they won't be able to increase by £100 a month then

    Why is that?  Section 13 will still be in place.  The ability to raise by £100 will depend on the rent .vs. market value as is the case today.  The only difference will be the L could not use the threat of Section 21.
  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thank you all in advance. I hope you can provide me with an answer to my post as i'm struggling to clarify what I need to do or not next.

    My letting agent tried to serve a section 13 in April 2025 raising my rent from 650 to 695 I contacted them to inform them that it was invalid as it was only 10 months since they served me with the last one. They withdrew the notice.

    They have now tried this again proposing an increase from mid June, they have served by email only not via postage and the information on the section 13 in regard to the rent wise is inaccurate, this one states that my current rent is 695 (it isnt) and they propose a rise to 750 a month. 

    I have not yet responded to this as frankly I am tired of their incompetence and dont want to help them by pointing out their errors only for them to serve it again but my questions are.

    Could this get through if I dont dispute it? I believe that it would be thrown out if they tried to serve as the information on the notice regarding current rent is inaccurate.

    Also as they have attempted to serve 2 of these now would it be valid anyway as I read that only one can be served a year. I dont know if this means one successful section 13 or it also applies to one which is thrown out due to inaccuracies.

    Any help would be appreciated.
    Depends how much you want to risk your tenancy.    If you keep quiet about the mistake and pay the old rent they may just decide you are being beligerent and issue Section 21 instead before the RR Bill comes in.  They might even take enough care to serve it correctly.
    If you want to stay on good terms I would be inclined to point out their admin error.

  • I'm not at all bothered about staying on their good side. I do have options if they end the tenancy. I'm not prepared to pay a rent hike that is over 5% and I know that the place will need substantial renovation if they want to get market value rent for it.

    I'm just not keen on incompetent greedy letting agents. If they want my custom they do the job they are supposed to.
  • saajan_12
    saajan_12 Posts: 5,087 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The tribunal will not intervene if you don't dispute it, so you can't just wait and do nothing.

    1) Wait until the date stated on the notice if you want, and then refute it with the LL saying that you assume the rent is unchanged since the notice is invalid. They may well reserve, but you've bought a bit more time and the next time you can proceed with (2): 

    2) Dispute it with the tribunal, demonstrating what 'market rents' are in the are (if less than their proposed rent). 


    Also as they have attempted to serve 2 of these now would it be valid anyway as I read that only one can be served a year. I dont know if this means one successful section 13 or it also applies to one which is thrown out due to inaccuracies.

    Any help would be appreciated.
    Its not about serving notice, its 1 year after the rent was actually increased using the statutory process. If the notice was invalid and hence not acted on, then this 1 year threshold isn't met. This makes sense as the idea isn't to make an issue out of mistakes, its to ensure you don't have an ever increasing rent every few months. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.