PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tenants in Common - unequal deposit - what is fair?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Ruggers13
    Ruggers13 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    A method I have used which I believe to be fair is to be protect the 10% deposit via a deed of trust. Meaning if the house is 200k and the 10% deposit is 20k, in case of any future split the house is now worth 250k then partner A would first receive back 25k and then the rest of the equity split 50/50. This protects partner A's investment like any appreciating asset. 


  • Bookworm225
    Bookworm225 Posts: 393 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    Ruggers13 said:
    A method I have used which I believe to be fair is to be protect the 10% deposit via a deed of trust. Meaning if the house is 200k and the 10% deposit is 20k, in case of any future split the house is now worth 250k then partner A would first receive back 25k and then the rest of the equity split 50/50. This protects partner A's investment like any appreciating asset. 


     no need for a separate DoT, simply own 55% (110/200) to 45%
    That is the fairest way as that exposes the deposit to the full effect of price rises and falls.
    why should the deposit be protected in full if the price falls?

  • Ruggers13
    Ruggers13 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Ruggers13 said:
    A method I have used which I believe to be fair is to be protect the 10% deposit via a deed of trust. Meaning if the house is 200k and the 10% deposit is 20k, in case of any future split the house is now worth 250k then partner A would first receive back 25k and then the rest of the equity split 50/50. This protects partner A's investment like any appreciating asset. 


     no need for a separate DoT, simply own 55% (110/200) to 45%
    That is the fairest way as that exposes the deposit to the full effect of price rises and falls.
    why should the deposit be protected in full if the price falls?

    In my scenario payments were also not equal 50/50 after the initial deposit so a further added complex. Seemed easy to calculate based on protecting initial deposit as a % of the property at the time. There's more than one way to skin a cat.

    The deposit is not protected if the price falls. 
  • Bookworm225
    Bookworm225 Posts: 393 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    Ruggers13 said:
    Ruggers13 said:
    A method I have used which I believe to be fair is to be protect the 10% deposit via a deed of trust. Meaning if the house is 200k and the 10% deposit is 20k, in case of any future split the house is now worth 250k then partner A would first receive back 25k and then the rest of the equity split 50/50. This protects partner A's investment like any appreciating asset. 


     no need for a separate DoT, simply own 55% (110/200) to 45%
    That is the fairest way as that exposes the deposit to the full effect of price rises and falls.
    why should the deposit be protected in full if the price falls?

    The deposit is not protected if the price falls. 
    which is exactly why I said the decision is driven by the deposit provider's attitude to risk of money loss v inflationary loss 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.