We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
RNRB unused query
Options

cheshireperson
Posts: 22 Forumite

in Cutting tax
Hi . I thought I’d got my head around this , but am now questioning my calculations due to differing posts on here. My Mum passed away in August 2016 and everything passed to my Dad who we lost in March this year. As there was no RNRB in place in 2016 , can I claim it ? I thought I could claim the full £175 k but now I’m not sure . The wording on official guidance is unclear . Thank you
0
Comments
-
1
-
Thank you . I’d read that but somebody on here said it wasn’t the case !0
-
cheshireperson said:Thank you . I’d read that but somebody on here said it wasn’t the case !1
-
I've just done the IHT for a similar scenario and it is the full £175,000 that's available.
This page is quite clear about how it's calculated and is in line with the workings on IHT436. In the example it's £150,000 because the death was in 2019, but for a death in the current year it would be £175,000.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/inheritance-tax-transfer-of-threshold
Edit: I've just seen that the link's already been posted by those arguing it's only £100,000, but the example shows that's incorrect. You may also want to work through an example on IHT436 to see that the end result is a £175,000 allowance as it's based on the % unused at first death (always 100 prior to RNRB being introduced) multiplied by the RNRB in effect at the second death.2 -
Thanks - you will get why I’m confused as this is also off the HMRC website :
For deaths before 6 April 2017.
For deaths before 6 April 2017, as there was no RNRB at that time, none can have been used. The brought-forward amount will be 100% of the residential enhancement in force at the later death of the surviving spouse or civil partner.
1 -
Hi SoozyJ22 . That’s the conclusion I came to ! It’s really unclear with the £100k example they give . Thank you .1
-
It threw me a bit when I first saw it. But once you work through the IHT436 it becomes clearer. In our case there is no taper on the first death so box 13 is set to 100% as instructed at box 8:0
-
Dear SoozyJ22 . Yes I certainly remember filling that in ! There’s a lot of mis information out there . That serves me right for over - researching !!1
-
It’s why a percentage is used, and not a monetary amount, so that you can benefit from any increasesI’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Pension, Debt Free Wanabee, and Over 50 Money Saving boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the Report button, or by e-mailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards