We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Savings comparison
Comments
-
LHW99 said:yeskbanker said:OP is obviously inspired by the fictional game after which they're seemingly named:Numberwang: A "maths quiz" game show in which two contestants, Simon and Julie (Paterson Joseph and Olivia Colman), call out numbers until the host (Webb) declares "That's Numberwang." The rules of the game are left completely unexplained to the viewer, and appear to follow no logic whatsoever, to the point that sometimes the gameplay even seems to contradict itself. What Numberwang actually means is never revealed.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/That_Mitchell_and_Webb_LookMornington Crescent!(I'm Sorry I haven't a Clue...)
0 -
friolento said:Numberwang_2 said:friolento said:MNumberwang_2 said:friolento said:You need to compare apples with apples - but 5.25% is always more than 3.5%The figures are irrelevant I think, just trying to workout if better to save monthly at higher interest or in one lump sum at lower interest. In the above it would be better to invest in one go at the lower %. (I think)
You are definitely missing something. As it doesn't appear you used the calculator, I have done it for you.It clearly shows that you can make more than £83 (/£84) in interest. £24, nearly 30% more, actually. So please have a closer look at the linked information.
I'd also like to mention that the interest rate for the RS in your example is, and remains, 5.25%. It is not 3% at all. If it ever was 3%, you'd get substantially less than £68 interest from the RS.
As you are apparently not willing to look at the link and the calculations I posted, or to what others have posted, I give up.Just in parting, I have to add that you have got this totally wrong. You are also talking savings, not investments. There is a substantial difference between these two.Sorry seem to have upset you, I’m glad for any help.I did look, it’s just the calculator seemed irrelevant as the fixed saving only allows up to 2 withdrawals per year, so can’t drip feed for the whole 12 months.But from your results using the calculator monthly saver at 5.25% would yeald £68 but if I left all in a fixed saver at 3.5% would yeald £83, that’s what was confusing me, that the lower % was getting more interest over the 12 months.
I obviously wasn’t taking in to account the opportunity of the remaining reducing balance, that would yeald £39 in the said calculator.
Also as below was the thinking in my head. This is how the interest adds up to £68
month 1 £200 @ 5.25% =10.50
month 2 £200 @ 5.25% =9.63 equates to 4.815%
month 3 £200 @ 5.25% =8.75 = 4.37%
month 4 £200 @ 5.25% =7.88 = 3.94%
mth 5. = 7.00 = 3.5%
mth 6. = 6.13 = 3.06%
mth 7. = 5.25 = 2.65%
and so on
so I was thinking that the £200 I deposit in month 7 was only getting 2.65%, so assumed better off leaving in the 3.5%.
But thick me was not realising that both are for 6 months so the 3.5% would also be reduced as is over 6 months not 12 months.I was just thinking in my head there was some calculation to maximise interest with a fixed sum if spread over a monthly deposit and a single deposit.
Anyways as LHW399 would remind me, ‘That’s Wangernum’ for this thread.0 -
Numberwang_2 said:friolento said:Numberwang_2 said:friolento said:MNumberwang_2 said:friolento said:You need to compare apples with apples - but 5.25% is always more than 3.5%The figures are irrelevant I think, just trying to workout if better to save monthly at higher interest or in one lump sum at lower interest. In the above it would be better to invest in one go at the lower %. (I think)
You are definitely missing something. As it doesn't appear you used the calculator, I have done it for you.It clearly shows that you can make more than £83 (/£84) in interest. £24, nearly 30% more, actually. So please have a closer look at the linked information.
I'd also like to mention that the interest rate for the RS in your example is, and remains, 5.25%. It is not 3% at all. If it ever was 3%, you'd get substantially less than £68 interest from the RS.
As you are apparently not willing to look at the link and the calculations I posted, or to what others have posted, I give up.Just in parting, I have to add that you have got this totally wrong. You are also talking savings, not investments. There is a substantial difference between these two.Sorry seem to have upset you, I’m glad for any help.I did look, it’s just the calculator seemed irrelevant as the fixed saving only allows up to 2 withdrawals per year, so can’t drip feed for the whole 12 months.But from your results using the calculator monthly saver at 5.25% would yeald £68 but if I left all in a fixed saver at 3.5% would yeald £83, that’s what was confusing me, that the lower % was getting more interest over the 12 months.
I obviously wasn’t taking in to account the opportunity of the remaining reducing balance, that would yeald £39 in the said calculator.
Also as below was the thinking in my head. This is how the interest adds up to £68
month 1 £200 @ 5.25% =10.50
month 2 £200 @ 5.25% =9.63 equates to 4.815%
month 3 £200 @ 5.25% =8.75 = 4.37%
month 4 £200 @ 5.25% =7.88 = 3.94%
mth 5. = 7.00 = 3.5%
mth 6. = 6.13 = 3.06%
mth 7. = 5.25 = 2.65%
and so on
so I was thinking that the £200 I deposit in month 7 was only getting 2.65%, so assumed better off leaving in the 3.5%.
But thick me was not realising that both are for 6 months so the 3.5% would also be reduced as is over 6 months not 12 months.I was just thinking in my head there was some calculation to maximise interest with a fixed sum if spread over a monthly deposit and a single deposit.
Anyways as LHW399 would remind me, ‘That’s Wangernum’ for this thread.
Eco Miser
Saving money for well over half a century0 -
Numberwang_2 said:
Also as below was the thinking in my head. This is how the interest adds up to £68
month 1 £200 @ 5.25% =10.50
month 2 £200 @ 5.25% =9.63 equates to 4.815%
month 3 £200 @ 5.25% =8.75 = 4.37%
month 4 £200 @ 5.25% =7.88 = 3.94%
mth 5. = 7.00 = 3.5%
mth 6. = 6.13 = 3.06%
mth 7. = 5.25 = 2.65%
and so on
so I was thinking that the £200 I deposit in month 7 was only getting 2.65%, so assumed better off leaving in the 3.5%.
But thick me was not realising that both are for 6 months so the 3.5% would also be reduced as is over 6 months not 12 months.I was just thinking in my head there was some calculation to maximise interest with a fixed sum if spread over a monthly deposit and a single deposit.
If you put £200 per month into the 7% account, you're right, you are not getting 7% interest on the full £2400 because not all of that money has been in the account for a full year. So overall, roughly half the interest you expect.
But imagine if you were doing the same payments into the 3.5% account, i.e. £200 per month. You would also get a much lower amount of interest than 3.5% of £2400. Depositing it as a lump sum at the start of the year means that it looks like a better return than the regular saver, but just because the money has spent a full year in the account.
Best tactic? Put the lump sum in the 3.5% account, and (assuming it allows unlimited withdrawals) transfer £200 a month over to the regular saver. That way, all your money is still earning interest, either 3.5% or 7%, and by the end of the year it will all be earning 7%. If you want more exact figures, a spreadsheet does the trick.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards