PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Average charge for access rights

Options
2

Comments

  • swingaloo
    swingaloo Posts: 3,491 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Another point here, has the leaseholder got permission from the freeholder to build into the dormer. I know someone who lives in an upstairs flat and they have converted above them (with planning permission) but now they are in a position where they cant sell as they dont own what is above them. Planning permission can be gained but if you dont own the space then you cannot use it.
    The person I know has wasted thousands converting and blames it on the fact that as she got planning permission she was given the right to convert but is now in a very difficult position.
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 22,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    Auti said:
    Just a thought that they could not block access doors due to health and safety - what if there was a fire and you needed to use the door to exit?
    Very true. They're basically trying to save costs so they don't have to use more complex scaffolding but that would restrict my rear exit to the building completely as it would block both kitchen door and the back gate. Good point thanks.
    Then rather than charge a sum of money insist that they do not block your back door and block light from your house. 

    If they do block light then it would be reasonable for them to pay your electricity bills. 
  • WIAWSNB
    WIAWSNB Posts: 943 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi Dusty.
    Are you sure charging them a weekly sum is the best approach? 
    I struggle to see how scaffolding can prevent a whole garden from being used? Or how it can block a doorway? Could you explain, please?
    I can understand there being some loss of light from the shade created by the upper scaff boards, but how would that be more excessive than from, say, an overcast day?
    Mess and dust - yes, these could very well be issues depending on the work being undertaken, but how would this be different if the scaffolding layout was rearranged? Isn't it just an unfortunate side effect of such work, regardless? As is noise. If you had internal work carried out that caused a racket, would you expect to compensate your neighbour for this?
    Damage - yes, this should absolutely be made good, and this often comes with associated betterment. Eg, if any decking is damaged, you should end up with new stuff.
    Personally I think you should focus on being as 'neighbourly' and accommodating as you'd hope they'd be for you, but - absolutely - nail down your expectations on the above issues. And perhaps a weekly compensatory sum should they exceed the expected/agreed time scale.
  • swingaloo
    swingaloo Posts: 3,491 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    WIAWSNB said:
    Hi Dusty.
    Are you sure charging them a weekly sum is the best approach? 
    I struggle to see how scaffolding can prevent a whole garden from being used? Or how it can block a doorway? Could you explain, please?
    I can understand there being some loss of light from the shade created by the upper scaff boards, but how would that be more excessive than from, say, an overcast day?
    Mess and dust - yes, these could very well be issues depending on the work being undertaken, but how would this be different if the scaffolding layout was rearranged? Isn't it just an unfortunate side effect of such work, regardless? As is noise. If you had internal work carried out that caused a racket, would you expect to compensate your neighbour for this?
    Damage - yes, this should absolutely be made good, and this often comes with associated betterment. Eg, if any decking is damaged, you should end up with new stuff.
    Personally I think you should focus on being as 'neighbourly' and accommodating as you'd hope they'd be for you, but - absolutely - nail down your expectations on the above issues. And perhaps a weekly compensatory sum should they exceed the expected/agreed time scale.
    Totally agree with this. I cant imagine why anyone would want to be so unhelpful to a neighbour as to charge them for having scaffolding up. They cant block a door or a window so the boards can only be above the window which of course may block some light but surely its not a major problem for a few weeks.
  • HobgoblinBT
    HobgoblinBT Posts: 314 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts
    Why not agree a fee to start after the expected completion of works as an incentive to remove the scaffolding asap. EG if the works are expected to take 4 weeks, agree that the upstairs neighbour pays say £100 per week from week 5 onwards.  
  • brianposter
    brianposter Posts: 1,530 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Or even charge a weekly sum which will be returned as long as the scaffolding is removed by an agreed date.
  • Auti
    Auti Posts: 535 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Homepage Hero Name Dropper
    Just wondered how you would enforce payment and if you can blanket refuse the scaffolding as it is needed - you would have to have a properly drafted agreement maybe involving a solicitor (your expense).
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,615 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    silvercar said:
    A family member had this recently. They didn’t charge in the interest of future neighbourly relations, but did insist that the scaffolding was placed in such a way that a door from the house to the garden wasn’t blocked. That did mean the scaffolders had to use a different layout that took longer to erect and used more scaffolding, but it was the most sensible approach. The scaffolding remained in place for twice as long as originally intended, so they were glad they insisted.
    Thank you, that's the issue, as I'm the ground floor apartment with private and sole use of the front and back garden, the only way they can build into the dormer for the flat above is by erecting the scaffolding in both gardens which will block the back doors and block light to my kitchen bedroom and lounge. I have a dog so majorly inconvenient. Also, the rear garden has wooden raised decking so I’ll need their confirmation in writing that any damage to the decking will need to be remedied and paid for by them. Such a difficult scenario! 
    There’s always another way. If they put the scaffolding so it extended further into your garden, you could at least open your doors. I would insist on this. Or they put the scaffolding in a different direction and bother other neighbours. Their choice, but I would be insisting on access. Family were glad they insisted, what was meant to be 6-8 weeks over winter months extended into 4 months into Spring.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,564 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As it's so invasive I'd perhaps suggest they pay for alternative suitable accommodation whilst the work is done.

    Or they need to erect the scaffolding so you have full access to the house. They can't block doors.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • XRS200
    XRS200 Posts: 241 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper First Anniversary
    edited 25 May at 4:21PM
    I wouldn't charge anything.

    I would get them to design it so it doesn't block doors.

    They'll need to agree to make good any damage.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.