We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
SURVEY RESULTS AND CONFUSED WHAT TO DO NEXT PROCEED OR PULL OUT OF HOUSE SALE
Options

HONEY2THEBEE
Posts: 5 Newbie

I am a first time buyer who is on trying to buy their 2nd property (had to pull out of the first after the survey and surveyor recommended that I walk away - to be fair I left it was the right decision).
I have now had a survey done on another property which apparently was a re natal but really doesn't look in a habitable state and the surveyor had said it is in poor condition by the main concerns are:
- movement and sloping on side of the house, upstairs and downstairs which could be subsidence although he doesn't think it is. The buyers who I believe are a housing agency have said there was no subsidence etc on their forms but the surveyor has said there is a deep crack in the wall above the window and also the render and bricks have been replacement at the moment of the structure and they should explain why that is the case.
- party wall issues, the neighbours extension overhangs by half a brick onto this property side which would apparently be issues for any extensions I wanted to have, which I would like to have in time, unless I did an uneven extension avoiding the section where they have over taken this properties space.
- back dwelling is a work site and he said could attract unsavoury characters.
There are also other things he mentioned and he thinks I would need at least 70,000 on top of the asking price to try and sort all issues.
On speaking to him I was wanting to pull out but a friend said I should get my solicitors to enqury about party wall agreements and the works to the wall etc before I make a decision and see if I can neogiogate money off the asking price.
Would I be stupid to by my first house with the above problems? I am a single person and don't have any family or people to help and so want to know if this would be stupid. The house also needs a complete refurb with electrics etc and is not in a liveable state.
Thanks in advance
0
Comments
-
Personally I would run a mile. That does sound like subsidence1
-
Why as a first time buyer, with no experience of renovating houses and no friends and family support, are you even looking at houses like this in the first place?
This type of house is much more suited to someone with experience, who can do some of the work themselves, and have a network of tradespeople to help ( and probably have another house to live in whilst the major work is carried out.)5 -
Unless you have money to pay for all the work needed and really want the house , don't lumber yourself with something that could become a big headache for you.
The buyers who I believe are a housing agency - where do the HA as buyers come into the equation?3 -
If you can afford £70k to do up this one then I would be looking to buy a habitable property that costs £70k more personally...but if you want this one and can afford it, go for it. You will need to find some decent builders2
-
We had a similar survey done on a property. Although we were so disappointed we walked away. In hindsight I’m so glad we did the property could have caused life changing debt. Personally I’d walk away structural and legal issues like that could be a money pit1
-
So sorry but I agree you need to walk away. I hope you can find somewhere that doesn't need as much essential work.£216 saved 24 October 20142
-
I wouldn’t buy that. I’m happy doing a bit of work but that’s too much. Plus, the location doesn’t sound great and that can’t be changed.1
-
I think unfortunately you are looking at houses you cannot remotely afford.1
-
sheramber said:Unless you have money to pay for all the work needed and really want the house , don't lumber yourself with something that could become a big headache for you.And double that £70K to cover for undiscovered problems and inflation. Then add a bit more as a contingency.To be honest, if a property is needing expensive repairs, walk (better still, run), especially if you are an FTB.Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.2 -
Thanks guys the tough love is what I needed. I can't afford it but am desperate to get on the ladder and also I didn't see any of these issues when viewing, otherwise if I had I would have not got attached.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards