We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
FAAC Mobility Services NtK
Comments
-
My response to the operators prima facie case:
1 -
And the adjudicators decision:
1 -
It seems the adjudicator is putting forward the case for the PPC, as the PPC has not presented any case. My understanding was that the adjudicator was supposed to be impartial, reviewing the cases from both sides and deciding accordingly. How can they then rule in favour of a side that offers no case?
Screenshots of the links to the operators pre-loaded signage photos. This particular link was for the signage site map, but all the links were dead, I've screenshots of all of them:
0 -
It didn't take too long to establish railway byelaws are in place at the station, as expected:
1 -
Move on and forget about it unless you get a court claim or you move
Thats all there is left to say..no need to spend any more time on this3 -
Except that this is dynamite evidence for the Appeals question in the Public Consultation which us why I asked for the screenshots of the IAS farce.ChirpyChicken said:Move on and forget about it unless you get a court claim or you move
Thats all there is left to say..no need to spend any more time on this
The PPC wrote a one liner and provided broken links so there was no evidence or argument to support their side at all.
But true to form, the IAS trotted out the irrelevant Elliott v Loake (just like these solicitors and barristers do in court, funny that...) and made the PPC's case for them despite the joke 'adjudicator' having seen no signs because no-one could, with a 404 error.
@RereyMuetre please please take an hour or two one evening to do the Public Consultation before it closes on Friday, even if you concentrate only on 2 things: the Appeals question and banning DRFs. Please upload your screenshot evidence or send it by email to the MHCLG Parking email.
They need to see this.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
4 Hours!
But done. Think I went overboard with the actual loss / profit / penalty theme.5 -
It'll take me even longer to collate all my stuff! Nicely done.RereyMuetre said:4 Hours!
But done. Think I went overboard with the actual loss / profit / penalty theme.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Good work!RereyMuetre said:4 Hours!
But done. Think I went overboard with the actual loss / profit / penalty theme.0 -
Well, letter from Trace Debt Recovery arrived today. Letter states it was sent on the 19th August.
I don't wish to engage with these people, and would rather go to court.
Ignore the debt collectors, or contact FMS and tell them I will only respond to court papers?
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards