We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Reeves' ISA review
Comments
-
But she didn't say that the £20k limit on Cash ISAs will stay the same.6
-
You're right and if you listen to her she actually said the £20k limit won't change on 'investments'. CASH ISA's weren't specified at all in the question or the answer.slinger2 said:But she didn't say that the £20k limit on Cash ISAs will stay the same.
Fast forward to 33.40 Newscast - Brexitcast: The EU-UK Deal (and our Rachel Reeves interview) - BBC Sounds0 -
Typical sloppy (bordering on ignorant) journalism where the headline does not match what was actually said.Alpine_Star said:Sounds like the major banks talked her out of it.
2 -
Once again the hype panic any hysteria comes to nothingbristolleedsfan said:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/19/reeves-backs-down-on-plans-to-cut-cash-isa-limit/
"Speaking to the BBC on Monday, Ms Reeves said: “I’m not going to reduce the limit of what people can put into an Isa, but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that’s in a pension or in their day-to-day savings"2 -
This is the Telegraph article (for those that can read it)There is a critical difference between the heading in the image above (which appears to be a misquote and without a source) and the heading in the Telegraph piece: the word Cash
Reeves backs down on plans to cut Isa limit
She has been clear from the outset that the ISA limit is not in her sights, it is the cash part of it that is unknown and nothing in the body of the article provides any change to that. There has been no back down, there has been no changeSpeculation compounded by misquoting, deliberate or otherwiseCare to reveal the source so we can avoid that publication?Edit: If you look at the actual link, I think there may have been some late modifications
2 -
She has said UK adults will still get a £20,000 ISA allowance, but that the cash element of that might be restricted to as little as 20% of it was what was panicing people. That hasn’t gone away, given she hasn’t said cash will be at least 50% of the total (or similar.) It surprises me that the same papers who were reporting on the cut are so busy reporting this as a climbdown that they’ve missed that that isn’t what she’s done. If she wants people to get better returns, then reducing the cash allowance must still be on the table.VNX said:
Once again the hype panic any hysteria comes to nothingbristolleedsfan said:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/19/reeves-backs-down-on-plans-to-cut-cash-isa-limit/
"Speaking to the BBC on Monday, Ms Reeves said: “I’m not going to reduce the limit of what people can put into an Isa, but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that’s in a pension or in their day-to-day savings"2 -
but that the cash element of that might be restricted to as little as 20% of it was what was panicing people.
AFAIK she has never mentioned those £4K/20% figures. It was only ever speculation in the media trying to whip up a bit of panic.
Or it could have been a deliberate leak, so when it is a bigger figure but less than £20K, it will not look so bad.4 -
Front page of today's Telegraph!ColdIron said:Care to reveal the source so we can avoid that publication?1 -
That would help Investment Trusts too, as purchases attract 0.5% tax, unlike funds and ETFs.MA260 said:If you want to boost the UK stock markets they should reduce the Share transaction tax which is higher than most major stock markets. This would boost the Uk stock market and also mean pension funds investing in UK would perform better. That is one of the reasons funds in Uk perform so poorly. They are charged 0.50% for each share purchase, then a lot of the funds charge 0.8% charges per year and on top of that the providers charge 0.40% annual fees, so that it lot of money going in fees if you buy uk shares or funds.
Or at least they could fix it so that shares brought inside Stocks Isa are not charged the 0.5% tax1 -
Unlikely though. It’s a golden goose for the Treasury - c.£3.5bn a year - and other broke governments have been increasing their FTTs e.g., recently France’s equivalent was increased to 0.4%.Beddie said:
That would help Investment Trusts too, as purchases attract 0.5% tax, unlike funds and ETFs.MA260 said:If you want to boost the UK stock markets they should reduce the Share transaction tax which is higher than most major stock markets. This would boost the Uk stock market and also mean pension funds investing in UK would perform better. That is one of the reasons funds in Uk perform so poorly. They are charged 0.50% for each share purchase, then a lot of the funds charge 0.8% charges per year and on top of that the providers charge 0.40% annual fees, so that it lot of money going in fees if you buy uk shares or funds.
Or at least they could fix it so that shares brought inside Stocks Isa are not charged the 0.5% tax1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


