We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Investment strategy 25/26
Comments
- 
            
Can you list your current platforms ?AL2022 said:
Thanks - do you know where is the cheapest platform to buy the HSBC funds for the first time?Albermarle said:
The usual alternative suggested to Life Strategy is the HSBC global strategy range.AL2022 said:
Thanks.Eyeful said:You can make investing as simple or as complex as you like.
Simple puts you in control, is easier to understand and monitor. Simple can also produce good results.
1. How well do you understand the gilts market?
2. What share/ gilt split, are you thinking of getting?
3. Do you know, there are low cost Global Multi- Asset Funds that do it for you?.
4. The following may be of interest to you:-
https://monevator.com/passive-fund-of-funds-the-rivals/
https://www.assetmanagement.hsbc.co.uk/en/intermediary/capabilities/multi-asset/hsbc-global-strategy-portfolios
Watch on You Tube
(a) https://www.kroijer.com/
(b) The James Shack video:
Vanguard LifeStrategy Funds Explained the only fund you will ever need (Investing for beginners)
Between my fiancée, myself and toddler we are heavily invested into Vanguard LifeStrategy 100. I hadn't really thought of that range of funds as mutli-asset, I guess because LS100 isn't! We do have a smaller amount in LS80 so do have some fixed income exposure there.
I'm having an internal debate whether to keep adding to our existing LS holdings or look for a multi-asset fund with a lower home bias.
Any recommendations very welcome!
The difference is that the equity % are not fixed but move around within a range. Also there is no UK bias.
In recent years they have outperformed Lifestrategy by a small amount, maybe not in recent months.
They don't appear to be available to purchase on any of the existing platforms I invest with.
Many thanks0 - 
            
With so many different benchmarks and funds that follow those different benchmarks, technically, none of them are free of some management decision, as you say.Eyeful said:
I understand the point you are making but feel it is a useful short hand way of describing the fund.dunstonh said:2. VLS are both low cost but VLS is passive, while HSBC is not passive.VLS is not passive. It has active decisions just like the HSBC GS funds. Notably home bias (on the classic version) and the use of a rigid equities ratio.
Probably no global asset fund, takes a completely passive passive approach..
Can you think of one?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 - 
            Albermarle said:
Can you list your current platforms ?AL2022 said:
Thanks - do you know where is the cheapest platform to buy the HSBC funds for the first time?Albermarle said:
The usual alternative suggested to Life Strategy is the HSBC global strategy range.AL2022 said:
Thanks.Eyeful said:You can make investing as simple or as complex as you like.
Simple puts you in control, is easier to understand and monitor. Simple can also produce good results.
1. How well do you understand the gilts market?
2. What share/ gilt split, are you thinking of getting?
3. Do you know, there are low cost Global Multi- Asset Funds that do it for you?.
4. The following may be of interest to you:-
https://monevator.com/passive-fund-of-funds-the-rivals/
https://www.assetmanagement.hsbc.co.uk/en/intermediary/capabilities/multi-asset/hsbc-global-strategy-portfolios
Watch on You Tube
(a) https://www.kroijer.com/
(b) The James Shack video:
Vanguard LifeStrategy Funds Explained the only fund you will ever need (Investing for beginners)
Between my fiancée, myself and toddler we are heavily invested into Vanguard LifeStrategy 100. I hadn't really thought of that range of funds as mutli-asset, I guess because LS100 isn't! We do have a smaller amount in LS80 so do have some fixed income exposure there.
I'm having an internal debate whether to keep adding to our existing LS holdings or look for a multi-asset fund with a lower home bias.
Any recommendations very welcome!
The difference is that the equity % are not fixed but move around within a range. Also there is no UK bias.
In recent years they have outperformed Lifestrategy by a small amount, maybe not in recent months.
They don't appear to be available to purchase on any of the existing platforms I invest with.
Many thanksIf the VLS investments are with Vanguard, they only offer their own funds. You can look at HL, II, AJBell, iWeb or another. Platform costs will vary (% or fixed per month) so it depends how much you have in, which type would be cheaper.Most platforms offer Vanguard funds, so you could always transfer the existing if you want an HSBC fund to run alongside in the same place.0 - 
            
Vanguard do not benchmark the VLS range against any index. The sub portfolio weightings being determined by an investment committee.IanManc said:
I don't agree with you.Eyeful said:
I understand the point you are making but feel it is a useful short hand way of describing the fund.dunstonh said:2. VLS are both low cost but VLS is passive, while HSBC is not passive.VLS is not passive. It has active decisions just like the HSBC GS funds. Notably home bias (on the classic version) and the use of a rigid equities ratio.
Probably no global asset fund, takes a completely passive passive approach..
Can you think of one?
The VLS funds are managed tied funds of funds, not passive funds.
Passive funds follow the makeup of a chosen index. VLS funds don't do that at all, and I think it is unhelpful and confusing - and not "useful" - to call them passive when they just aren't.0 - 
            
Fidelity World IndexEyeful said:
I understand the point you are making but feel it is a useful short hand way of describing the fund.dunstonh said:2. VLS are both low cost but VLS is passive, while HSBC is not passive.VLS is not passive. It has active decisions just like the HSBC GS funds. Notably home bias (on the classic version) and the use of a rigid equities ratio.
Probably no global asset fund, takes a completely passive passive approach..
Can you think of one?
Vanguard Global All Cap
L&G international Index
All are global asset funds that are completely passiveRemember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.2 - 
            
You are correct. However.....jimjames said:
Fidelity World IndexEyeful said:
I understand the point you are making but feel it is a useful short hand way of describing the fund.dunstonh said:2. VLS are both low cost but VLS is passive, while HSBC is not passive.VLS is not passive. It has active decisions just like the HSBC GS funds. Notably home bias (on the classic version) and the use of a rigid equities ratio.
Probably no global asset fund, takes a completely passive passive approach..
Can you think of one?
Vanguard Global All Cap
L&G international Index
All are global asset funds that are completely passive
Fidelity World Index is MSIC World (net total return)
Vanguard Global All Cap is FTSE Global All Cap Index
L&G international Index is FTSE World Ex UK TR GBP
So, each is a totally passive approach to a different benchmark and style.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.4 - 
            
However it would be useful to have a definition that sets them apart from true actively managed funds.IanManc said:
I don't agree with you.Eyeful said:
I understand the point you are making but feel it is a useful short hand way of describing the fund.dunstonh said:2. VLS are both low cost but VLS is passive, while HSBC is not passive.VLS is not passive. It has active decisions just like the HSBC GS funds. Notably home bias (on the classic version) and the use of a rigid equities ratio.
Probably no global asset fund, takes a completely passive passive approach..
Can you think of one?
The VLS funds are managed tied funds of funds, not passive funds.
Passive funds follow the makeup of a chosen index. VLS funds don't do that at all, and I think it is unhelpful and confusing - and not "useful" - to call them passive when they just aren't.
In previous threads that have touched on the subject, the phrase 'passively managed' or similar has been suggested.0 
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards
 
         
         