We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Law regarding work Sickness?
Comments
-
there is no such thing asa sick day 'allowance' ...penners324 said:I suspect the employer has got fed up with employees using their sick day 'allowance" like extra holiday.
going to stage 1 of attendance process after 1 episode of sickness inunusally strict but legal0 -
almost certainly hyperbolic paraphrasing or deliberate misreading , the IOP may even be assuming that introduction or enforcement of 'return to work' meetings with Supervision / management following any sickness absence is the first stage of the Capability processMattMattMattUK said:
Is that what they actually said, or is that a somewhat hyperbolic paraphrasing? If it was the former then I would expect it to be national news.Whitebeast said:
I work for 1 of the biggest retail stores in the UK, Yesterday I came in to work and there's a note to all employees regarding new sickness rules, We now only allowed to be off 1 day a year sick any more and we going to get a verbal warning than written and final and then sack. Is this even legal for the company?
It it actually bases around ability to self-certify sicknesses vs needing a doctor's note?
people often talk of ' being put on a disciplinary ' for being sick when in fact the capability and attendance process has started and a 'Stage 1' attendance warning has been given meaning enhanced monitoring , consideration of OH referral and the like, plus the actual warning that continuned absences can lead to capability actions.
if someone has a disability or chronic health condition which could be determined to be a disability under EA 2010, it;s rare that it goes all the way to dismissal unless there genuinely isn't a reasonable adapatation or the individual is putting themselves or others at risk... compare that to the person who calls out sick on multiple sundays or mondays becasue they have been on a bender over the weekend - but isn't someone who you need to go down the health side of Substance dependency with0 -
" disciplined " or have a return to work and then a Stage 1 Sickness/ attendance / capability meeting ?Chrysalis said:Most places I have worked for have/had similar policies.I remember being surprised its legal in my first job, but then I later realised it seems widespread practice across the country.
Having a sick note made no difference either, although typically exceptions would be given for major issues like surgery.
So to summarise if you wasnt hospitalised expect to get disciplined.
The one exception was for one employer who by coincidence was heavily unionised.
the number of people who talk about being 'disciplined' for sickness absence is none trival, the number of peopel actually disciplined for sickness absence is tiny , however there are plenty of people who get Stage 1 sickness warnings0 -
OP fails to provide the text of the notice or indeed the text of the plicy / statement in the employee handbookitsthelittlethings said:One day of sickness is not necessary or reasonable. You could have flu and be off for a week easily. It also encourages people to come in and spread their germs around, if it’s a retailer customers may include vulnerable members of the public. By all means have a robust sickness management policy but no more than one day a year is absolutely taking the mickey.
given the propensity of less than truthful statements to be made aobut sickenss / attendance policies , i'm writing the OP off as hyperbolic misrepresentation unless, and until, evidence presented of this 'policy'0 -
OLD THREAD
Another old thread resurected by a new poster.
The OP posted in April and hasn't logged on since July.4 -
Yes an old thread, but the content is still potentially relevant to other people.I don't know if it still happens, I suspect not, but it wasn't uncommon for unions to tell people 'not to forget your entitlement to sick days', i.e. use them as additional holiday. The introduction of absence/sickness monitoring has probably put and end to that.0
-
this has never been the case in the UK , as occupational sick pay is not a use it or lose it allowanceTELLIT01 said:Yes an old thread, but the content is still potentially relevant to other people.I don't know if it still happens, I suspect not, but it wasn't uncommon for unions to tell people 'not to forget your entitlement to sick days', i.e. use them as additional holiday. The introduction of absence/sickness monitoring has probably put and end to that.1 -
EnPointe said:
this has never been the case in the UK , as occupational sick pay is not a use it or lose it allowanceTELLIT01 said:Yes an old thread, but the content is still potentially relevant to other people.I don't know if it still happens, I suspect not, but it wasn't uncommon for unions to tell people 'not to forget your entitlement to sick days', i.e. use them as additional holiday. The introduction of absence/sickness monitoring has probably put and end to that.
I can assure you it very much was the case in the UK. When the unions powers were at their worst I know for a fact that it happened.0 -
Yup. I'm with you. This is how "Duvet Days" came about around 2010.TELLIT01 said:EnPointe said:
this has never been the case in the UK , as occupational sick pay is not a use it or lose it allowanceTELLIT01 said:Yes an old thread, but the content is still potentially relevant to other people.I don't know if it still happens, I suspect not, but it wasn't uncommon for unions to tell people 'not to forget your entitlement to sick days', i.e. use them as additional holiday. The introduction of absence/sickness monitoring has probably put and end to that.
I can assure you it very much was the case in the UK. When the unions powers were at their worst I know for a fact that it happened.
I notice that policy has now disappeared from most people's contracts.0 -
I fondly recall as a manager having a chat with one of my team and them enquiring as to how many more sick days they had to use until the end of the year as though it was a contractual entitlement.
I also recall in the same company if team members were not eligible for the personal performance element of the annual bonus then they would subsequently take off roughly the same amount of paid sick days that year as some form of compensation for the shortfall. It's a problem.
A few businesses I'm aware of are now have zero company paid sick days during the first year for new starters, for specific reasons.1
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards