We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Restrictive covenant
Comments
-
That sounds a terrible idea. Nobody idea advised him to do that. And it's an incorrect interpretation as I've already told you.Tulips2lips said:
MY SON CHECKED WITH THE OWNER OF THE COVENANT AND IT WOULD BE A BREACH AS THE LAND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOR ONE DWELLING WITH GARAGE.
If your son actually wants our advice it might be easier if he posts here himself rather than whatever Chinese whispers are going on.0 -
That does depend on whether what the OP posted yesterday represents the entirety of the (relevant) covenants though. Wouldn't it be a bit strange if what the OP posted was the only thing someone who took the trouble to impose restrictive covenants had decided to restrict?user1977 said:
That sounds a terrible idea. Nobody idea advised him to do that. And it's an incorrect interpretation as I've already told you....Tulips2lips said:
MY SON CHECKED WITH THE OWNER OF THE COVENANT AND IT WOULD BE A BREACH AS THE LAND IS ONLY TO BE USED FOR ONE DWELLING WITH GARAGE.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards