ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST - a WIN against PCM (UK) ltd @ the County Court

KoalaMSEF

With all the purchasing process still relatively fresh in my mind, it shouldn't be.

LPE1 may record that parking is permitted, which depends on how sellers filled in LPE1. Given that most people think it is great to have a parking company so their spot won't be taken by anybody, it doesn't seem to be a problem.

For anybody wary about it or had a bad experience with PPC/MA, they probably won't be the buyers. 

Car1980

Half_way said:

Based on how much you can claim in court for time, at up to £19/hour take it down a little, and it will make it seem more "reasonable" should you wish to push ahead with a court claim

I'd stick to £19 an hour. It's the standard, and you might have to explain why your time is worth less than the default.

Plus £19 an hour is still a pittance in this day and age.

egz23

1505grandad said:

"The only choice I have - to sell the leasehold property and move on."

Just thinking out loud  -  would the problems you have had with the MA/ppc have to be included in any documents needed by the buyer  -  would it affect the price (downwards?)

Realistically, the price of the leasehold flat won't go down just because of the parking or the Managing Agent (MA).
However, MA is signing on behalf of the Estate Management Company and collects service charges on the Landowners' (Trust) behalf, which looks like a conflict of Interest somewhere.
MA is known locally for being condescending towards tenants and leaseholders in our area.

Apologies to the narrators of this forum as Parking issue deviated into the leaseholders' issues.