We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Can claimant include debt recovery charges incurred prior to issuing proceedings?
jengleruk
Posts: 7 Forumite
I received a "PCN" from PCM which I have disputed due to poor and confusing signage.
They (obviously) refused my representation quoting some nonsensical legal principles to me.
I have invited them to issue a claim and am content for a judge to determine if the charge is due.
But they have (as expected) gone ahead and instructed Trace Debt Recovery.
I understand that they are a 3rd party etc. I have written again to PCM telling them that I continue to dispute this and inviting them again to issue a claim if they still think a sum is due.
Can I ask: are there any circumstances under which a judge could decide that I am liable for costs which PCM has incurred with a debt recovery firm prior to this issue being litigated?
I was wondering if there was something in the code of practice which the judges took notice of...
Thanks for any advice.
They (obviously) refused my representation quoting some nonsensical legal principles to me.
I have invited them to issue a claim and am content for a judge to determine if the charge is due.
But they have (as expected) gone ahead and instructed Trace Debt Recovery.
I understand that they are a 3rd party etc. I have written again to PCM telling them that I continue to dispute this and inviting them again to issue a claim if they still think a sum is due.
Can I ask: are there any circumstances under which a judge could decide that I am liable for costs which PCM has incurred with a debt recovery firm prior to this issue being litigated?
I was wondering if there was something in the code of practice which the judges took notice of...
Thanks for any advice.
0
Comments
-
It's a rare judge who falls for the added £70 so I wouldn't worry about it. You say "costs which PCM has incurred with a debt recovery firm" but they never have incurred costs because all the parking DRAs operate as no-win-no-fee.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD5 -
They can add whatever they like to the original invoice, but that doesn't make it enforceable and most judges dismiss the spurious charges anyway, if the Defendant lost the case5
-
The £70 is the limit imposed by their trade body. It has no legal status and conveniently they all incur exactly £70 on the stroke of midnight on the 28th day. I can't think of any other business that incurs 70% on a day's late invoice. 60 days is quite common in invoice terms. You wouldn't do the work if you somehow lost seventy quid per job.
You can dispute the invoice, as you have done, and make it clear that incurring a "loss" is therefore at their own risk, not recoverable as they have a duty to minimise their losses, (a phantom facade in any case) and recovery is futile as the invoice is disputed.
It's just a handy extra paragraph you can add to the defence, along with the fact The Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 does not apply to private to business debts (and is limited to £40 in any case), and that the 8% interest they are claiming is designed to compensate for late payments.6 -
Do the lawyers acting for PPCs, such as DCB Legal operate on no-win-no-fee basis: Perhaps, getting a chunk of whatever is recovered via court claims?Coupon-mad said:It's a rare judge who falls for the added £70 so I wouldn't worry about it. You say "costs which PCM has incurred with a debt recovery firm" but they never have incurred costs because all the parking DRAs operate as no-win-no-fee.1 -
It varies depending what particular deal from their menu that they have agreed with any particular PPC.
1 -
We don't know. My best guess is it might be a CFA-Lite arrangement (Google it - if unfamiliar).Blindside6 said:
Do the lawyers acting for PPCs, such as DCB Legal operate on no-win-no-fee basis: Perhaps, getting a chunk of whatever is recovered via court claims?Coupon-mad said:It's a rare judge who falls for the added £70 so I wouldn't worry about it. You say "costs which PCM has incurred with a debt recovery firm" but they never have incurred costs because all the parking DRAs operate as no-win-no-fee.
Also known as 'eat what you kill'. That fits in perfectly with the lion on the wall at DCB offices. And the photo of their Director hunting on a safari with his foot on a dead animal. That's on the forum somewhere.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
That's a very impressive range of knowledge. Can you help me with a list of all the PPCs for whom DCB Legal act as reps?Car1980 said:It varies depending what particular deal from their menu that they have agreed with any particular PPC.1 -
I'll try with a few:Blindside6 said:
That's a very impressive range of knowledge. Can you help me with a list of all the PPCs for whom DCB Legal act as reps?Car1980 said:It varies depending what particular deal from their menu that they have agreed with any particular PPC.
ParkingEye
Civil Enforcement
UKPC
Group Nexus
Spring Parking
G24
Excel
VCS
Euro Car Parks
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Thank you. I'll start my list with those.Coupon-mad said:
I'll try with a few:Blindside6 said:
That's a very impressive range of knowledge. Can you help me with a list of all the PPCs for whom DCB Legal act as reps?Car1980 said:It varies depending what particular deal from their menu that they have agreed with any particular PPC.
ParkingEye
Civil Enforcement
UKPC
Group Nexus
Spring Parking
G24
Excel
VCS
Euro Car Parks
Is it a safe assumption that those PPCs, by whom DCB Legal is instructed, are same as the ones for whom sister company, Direct Collection Bailiffs, bully and harass drivers/keepers?
Both controlled by same parent company, Direct Group Ltd.1 -
Yes. Always DCB Ltd bullying first.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

