We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
TV licence email what do I do
Comments
-
I would say the question "do you have a licence" should be read as "are you covered by a TV licence", so the OP should have answered yes, whereas I guess maybe they said no, which caused the email.iniltous said:do you have a license
Re any moral question, I don't see any difference between someone who doesn't have a TV licence at home using iPlayer in this scenario, and someone who doesn't have Sky Sports at home watching Sky Sports in their hotel room.
The person staying at the hotel is paying the hotel for the room, and part of the hotel's costs are the payment for their TV licence, so effectively the person is paying a fraction of the cost of a TV licence, and getting a fraction of the benefit.1 -
I think it's quite likely that a person would have to answer "Yes" and actually use iPlayer to watch BBC TV to trigger the email. I'd hope that watching S4C on iPlayer wouldn't trigger the email (because a Licence isn't required to do that).Detail_Merchant said:
I would say the question "do you have a licence" should be read as "are you covered by a TV licence", so the OP should have answered yes, whereas I guess maybe they said no, which caused the email.iniltous said:do you have a license
Re any moral question, I don't see any difference between someone who doesn't have a TV licence at home using iPlayer in this scenario, and someone who doesn't have Sky Sports at home watching Sky Sports in their hotel room.
The person staying at the hotel is paying the hotel for the room, and part of the hotel's costs are the payment for their TV licence, so effectively the person is paying a fraction of the cost of a TV licence, and getting a fraction of the benefit.
I agree with you, though, that the question effectively means "Are you currently covered by a TV Licence". There are a lot of circumstances when a person using iPlayer doesn't personally have a Licence, but is covered by one. Fundamentally, there's a problem with the confusion between a person having a Licence and a location having one - the latter is what the law requires.1 -
given that iplayer requires you to confirm that you do have a valid TV licence to acces content which requires a TV licence to view , you are firmly in the wrongJoeyb247 said:Hi I don't have a TV licence as I never watch live TV or iPlayer. I recently stayed in a UK hotel that had BBC channels/licence and I watched an episode on iPlayer. I have now received an email telling me I have to buy a licence, is this right have I inadvertently broken the rules?0 -
Licence is required when watching ANY live broadcast regardless of the broadcasterCornucopia said:
I think it's quite likely that a person would have to answer "Yes" and actually use iPlayer to watch BBC TV to trigger the email. I'd hope that watching S4C on iPlayer wouldn't trigger the email (because a Licence isn't required to do that).Detail_Merchant said:
I would say the question "do you have a licence" should be read as "are you covered by a TV licence", so the OP should have answered yes, whereas I guess maybe they said no, which caused the email.iniltous said:do you have a license
Re any moral question, I don't see any difference between someone who doesn't have a TV licence at home using iPlayer in this scenario, and someone who doesn't have Sky Sports at home watching Sky Sports in their hotel room.
The person staying at the hotel is paying the hotel for the room, and part of the hotel's costs are the payment for their TV licence, so effectively the person is paying a fraction of the cost of a TV licence, and getting a fraction of the benefit.
I agree with you, though, that the question effectively means "Are you currently covered by a TV Licence". There are a lot of circumstances when a person using iPlayer doesn't personally have a Licence, but is covered by one. Fundamentally, there's a problem with the confusion between a person having a Licence and a location having one - the latter is what the law requires.0 -
Just use a throwaway email and VPN regardless. End of . . .0
-
The question is wrong - it should ask whether a person is covered by a Licence in the place they are viewing from. Which it is likely the OP was.EnPointe said:
given that iplayer requires you to confirm that you do have a valid TV licence to acces content which requires a TV licence to view , you are firmly in the wrongJoeyb247 said:Hi I don't have a TV licence as I never watch live TV or iPlayer. I recently stayed in a UK hotel that had BBC channels/licence and I watched an episode on iPlayer. I have now received an email telling me I have to buy a licence, is this right have I inadvertently broken the rules?1 -
Yes (any TV broadcast) - but not for watching S4C on-demand on iPlayer, or indeed any commercial on-demand content on any platform.LightFlare said:
Licence is required when watching ANY live broadcast regardless of the broadcasterCornucopia said:
I think it's quite likely that a person would have to answer "Yes" and actually use iPlayer to watch BBC TV to trigger the email. I'd hope that watching S4C on iPlayer wouldn't trigger the email (because a Licence isn't required to do that).Detail_Merchant said:
I would say the question "do you have a licence" should be read as "are you covered by a TV licence", so the OP should have answered yes, whereas I guess maybe they said no, which caused the email.iniltous said:do you have a license
Re any moral question, I don't see any difference between someone who doesn't have a TV licence at home using iPlayer in this scenario, and someone who doesn't have Sky Sports at home watching Sky Sports in their hotel room.
The person staying at the hotel is paying the hotel for the room, and part of the hotel's costs are the payment for their TV licence, so effectively the person is paying a fraction of the cost of a TV licence, and getting a fraction of the benefit.
I agree with you, though, that the question effectively means "Are you currently covered by a TV Licence". There are a lot of circumstances when a person using iPlayer doesn't personally have a Licence, but is covered by one. Fundamentally, there's a problem with the confusion between a person having a Licence and a location having one - the latter is what the law requires.0 -
It isn't a legal declaration. Ts & Cs for the website at best.EnPointe said:
It is a legal declaration.iniltous said:No one is suggesting the question on the Iplayer is a legal document, it’s a moral question….do you have a license, if the asnswer is no but you proceed to watch , you have lied .0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

