We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Spreading the risk: too much digital and in cash
Options
Comments
-
AlanP_2 said:I'm surprised to see how many posters seem to think that governments may have a plan for such a situation. Given how much pre-planning had gone on for a pandemic prior to COVID that seems overly optimistic by a long way to me.
I worked in a public sector emergency Planing and Business Continuity role for a few years and the briefings from health partners was that a pandemic was a "when it happens" risk not an "if it happens" risk.
...Goverments had carried out pre-planning for a pandemic, but assumptions had (rightly) been made on the type of pandemic and it wasn't anything like Covid turned out to be.But health emergency planning isn't the same as planning for defence and national security planning, so the issues experienced dealing with Covid don't mean that plans aren't in place for other aspects of civilian and military life.A major flu pandemic was something the government knew would be coming sometime in the future. Cyber attacks and other national security threats are happening every day. The latter tends to focus the minds of politicians more than discussions about something which might or might not happen before they leave office.2 -
AlanP_2 said:I'm surprised to see how many posters seem to think that governments may have a plan for such a situation. Given how much pre-planning had gone on for a pandemic prior to COVID that seems overly optimistic by a long way to me.
I worked in a public sector emergency Planing and Business Continuity role for a few years and the briefings from health partners was that a pandemic was a "when it happens" risk not an "if it happens" risk.
This was reflected in the National Risk Register, see here for the 2025 edition if you are interested
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-risk-register-2025
(There is an unpublished National Security Register as well which is more likely to have additional "nation state" level risks identified.)
Despite this, and to a degree understandably, there was limited preparation at a strategic, national level as putting mitigation measures in place had costs and there isn't an unlimited supply of money.
Drugs, PPE etc have a limited shelf life.
Having a few empty hospitals and associated staff on standby "just in case" whilst there are long waiting lists anyway is a sure fire vote winner the vast majority of the time 😱
With better planning, it might not have lasted as long, fewer people would have died, the economy might be in a better place... but we're still here. As we will next time.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards