We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Changes in Budget to pensions
Comments
-
If you search the forum you can find threads about the TFLS being abolished going back at least 15 years and often they refer to something they’ve read in the Telegraph. It’s very laudable of the Telegraph to support the treasury like this but you would think their readers might have cottoned on by now.
6 -
i heard that regular savers are a con as you only get half the promised interest!4
-
If you can do something now that makes you no worse off under current rules but protects you from potential future rule changes then what is the downside?I think....1
-
HedgehogRulez said:i heard that regular savers are a con as you only get half the promised interest!5
-
michaels said:If you can do something now that makes you no worse off under current rules but protects you from potential future rule changes then what is the downside?
The risk is mostly that people will (a) withdraw more than they can pay into an ISA and end up liable for tax on growth that they would not have had to pay had they left it in their pension or (b) put money that they are not going to need for many years in a cash savings account once they've withdrawn it, and miss out on long term growth altogether. As the sort of people who panic at every Telegraph headline or shock horror YouTube video tend to be at the less financially savvy end of the spectrum, the chance that they will so something like this is fairly high.
The other potential downside is that you're just switching the risk of future changes to pension rules for risk of changes to ISA rules. Suppose you withdrew your lump sum and put it all in ISAs, then the government left pension lump sums alone but introduced a lifetime cap on how much you can keep in an ISA? Seeing as we're indulging in wild speculation about future policy changes, we might as well consider that one as well...2 -
artyboy said:HedgehogRulez said:i heard that regular savers are a con as you only get half the promised interest!7
-
Albermarle said:artyboy said:HedgehogRulez said:i heard that regular savers are a con as you only get half the promised interest!0
-
Kotokos said:Albermarle said:artyboy said:HedgehogRulez said:i heard that regular savers are a con as you only get half the promised interest!4
-
Aretnap said:I heard Rachel Reeves is going to abolish all private property. So take it all out, and make sure you spend it on wine, women and song before March 26th.
(Alternatively you could always not make major financial decisions based off random things that you read in the Internet)"Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius1 -
Kotokos said:Albermarle said:artyboy said:HedgehogRulez said:i heard that regular savers are a con as you only get half the promised interest!2
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards