We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Vanguard funds for a new investor
Comments
-
Isn’t it just a market cap weighted allocation apart from an overweight to the UK?Hoenir said:
Believe it to be quarterly. The internal fund allocations are far from fixed / rigid. VLS is an actively managed fund of passive funds. Hence why they've never benchmarked the range against any indices.InvesterJones said:
When was the last time Vanguard Life Strategy was 'tweaked' as events unfolded?Hoenir said:
Wouldn't recommend this route. Either be fully active yourself. Or pass control over to a fund manager that uses passive funds in an active manner (a multi asset fund). For example as a well known brand - Vanguard Life Strategy. Investing is cyclical in nature. Better to have the portfolio tweaked as events unfold.Cococatdog said:I'm looking to take control of my workplace SIPP and want to start investing in index tracker funds to forget about for the next 30 years.
As far as the UK is concerned. Vanguard only arrived on these shores in 2010. Pretty much a one way street in the time period since.0 -
Many people would see their cash savings as somehow separate from their investments, pensions etc but ideally you should see them as part of the bigger picture.Cococatdog said:Labtebricolist said:VWRP is a perfect set and forget ETF. It is the main ETF in my pension fund - I have around 75% in this with 20 per cent in bonds and 5 per cent in a gold ETF. As you get older there may be an argument for complementing it with a bond fund or other non-stock assets, but not 30 years out.
Bear in mind that active management and/or fund of funds are very unlikely to beat the market average over a 30 year time horizon, especially when their significantly higher fees are taken into account. Almost all of the research supports this and, for the majority of people, a passive approach tracking a well diversified index (such as the FTSE all world tracked by VWRP) is the most sensible approach.Thanks - super helpful! When you say 20% in bonds, do you mean directly invested in bonds, or in a bond based fund?I was also aiming for 80% equity approach for now, would you count cash in ISAs towards the 20% if I'm willing to earmark it as retirement funds?
Some cash could be earmarked for emergency funds, short term spending, but otherwise it is part of the bigger mix.2 -
Cococatdog said:
I've been reading around and thought a completely passive index tracker was the best option over the long term but maybe I've been influenced by the FIRE community on reddit a bit too much? Isn't any tweaking only as good as the fund manager? Will have a look at Vanguard life strategy though - thanks.Hoenir said:
Wouldn't recommend this route. Either be fully active yourself. Or pass control over to a fund manager that uses passive funds in an active manner (a multi asset fund). For example as a well known brand - Vanguard Life Strategy. Investing is cyclical in nature. Better to have the portfolio tweaked as events unfold.Cococatdog said:I'm looking to take control of my workplace SIPP and want to start investing in index tracker funds to forget about for the next 30 years.Tweaking is a game of chance and costs you money. The Vanguard LifeStrategy portfolios very rarely undergo any material change except for rebalancing, and then do so for marketing reasons. If you can cope with having an equity tracker and a bond tracker, you use cash flow rebalancing:I prefer that approach if you know what you are doing, but most people don't.1 -
I'm a little confused at the moment, I bought the most popular Vanguard S&P tracker (VUAG) on the 8th April, its currently showing as up around 5% ... yet in that same time period the S&P is up around 14%.
Why isnt my tracker reflecting the S&P gains??0 -
No. It's an actively managed portfolio of sub funds. Vanguard have never benchmarked the VLS range. Whatever their methology it's never been disclosed. UK listed companies a high % of their revenue from overseas. The only bias is in the minds of investors. Who will happily pay a premium for a US company in exactly the same global market sector. Never understood this myth as the information has always been in the public domain.NithyaH said:
Isn’t it just a market cap weighted allocation apart from an overweight to the UK?Hoenir said:
Believe it to be quarterly. The internal fund allocations are far from fixed / rigid. VLS is an actively managed fund of passive funds. Hence why they've never benchmarked the range against any indices.InvesterJones said:
When was the last time Vanguard Life Strategy was 'tweaked' as events unfolded?Hoenir said:
Wouldn't recommend this route. Either be fully active yourself. Or pass control over to a fund manager that uses passive funds in an active manner (a multi asset fund). For example as a well known brand - Vanguard Life Strategy. Investing is cyclical in nature. Better to have the portfolio tweaked as events unfold.Cococatdog said:I'm looking to take control of my workplace SIPP and want to start investing in index tracker funds to forget about for the next 30 years.
As far as the UK is concerned. Vanguard only arrived on these shores in 2010. Pretty much a one way street in the time period since.0 -
Because you are not in the US. As a UK investor, you are subject to currency fluctuations and the pound has risen against the dollar, neutralising much of the S&P500 gain in that period.jacko74 said:I'm a little confused at the moment, I bought the most popular Vanguard S&P tracker (VUAG) on the 8th April, its currently showing as up around 5% ... yet in that same time period the S&P is up around 14%.
Why isnt my tracker reflecting the S&P gains??
The exchange rate is predicted to get to around 1.5. If that happens, then UK investors in US equities are going to take some pain.
This is not unexpected. It's a cycle that happens. You never know when it will start but so far, it does look like this period is not the time to be overweight in US equities.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.5 -
Hoenir said:
No. It's an actively managed portfolio of sub funds. Vanguard have never benchmarked the VLS range. Whatever their methology it's never been disclosed.NithyaH said:
Isn’t it just a market cap weighted allocation apart from an overweight to the UK?Hoenir said:
Believe it to be quarterly. The internal fund allocations are far from fixed / rigid. VLS is an actively managed fund of passive funds. Hence why they've never benchmarked the range against any indices.InvesterJones said:
When was the last time Vanguard Life Strategy was 'tweaked' as events unfolded?Hoenir said:
Wouldn't recommend this route. Either be fully active yourself. Or pass control over to a fund manager that uses passive funds in an active manner (a multi asset fund). For example as a well known brand - Vanguard Life Strategy. Investing is cyclical in nature. Better to have the portfolio tweaked as events unfold.Cococatdog said:I'm looking to take control of my workplace SIPP and want to start investing in index tracker funds to forget about for the next 30 years.
As far as the UK is concerned. Vanguard only arrived on these shores in 2010. Pretty much a one way street in the time period since.Vanguard says:"The Fund is actively managed in that the Investment Adviser has discretion in respect of the Associated Schemes in which the Fund may invest and the allocations to them, each of which may change over time."The allocations do not appear to change much over time. Here are the latest published allocations for the equity part of VLS 60:* FTSE Developed World ex-U.K. Equity Index Fund GBP Acc 18.8%
* U.S. Equity Index Fund GBP Acc 15.5%
* FTSE U.K. All Share Index Unit Trust GBP Acc 15.4%
* Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund GBP Acc 4.6%
* FTSE Developed Europe ex-U.K. Equity Index Fund GBP Acc 2.8%
* Japan Stock Index Fund GBP Acc 1.4%
* Pacific ex-Japan Stock Index Fund GBP Acc 0.7%You can compare the ratios of the US to the various other regions with those for VWRL. There seems to be a reasonable match for those that I tried, with the exception of the UK. Vanguard has clearly under-weighted Canada, but it is not a big market. It is also worth noting that the emerging markets fund that they have chosen tracks the MSCI index, whereas the others track the FTSE indexes. That is not ideal.0 -
Since 8th April the S&P 500 is up 8.5% ( not 14 %)jacko74 said:I'm a little confused at the moment, I bought the most popular Vanguard S&P tracker (VUAG) on the 8th April, its currently showing as up around 5% ... yet in that same time period the S&P is up around 14%.
Why isnt my tracker reflecting the S&P gains??
In the same period the Pound against the Dollar increased by around 4%.
So you would expect a S&P tracker in GBP to be up around 4.5% over that period.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards