We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mortgage agreed in principle

AskAsk
Posts: 3,048 Forumite

We are selling a flat in London and we got an offer yesterday from a young FTB couple.
I asked the estate agent if they have a mortgage agreed in principle and he said yes. I asked him how much deposit are they putting down, he said 200k but it may be less as they may want to keep some of the money back for doing the refurbishment and paying for the lease extension and major works bill.
I asked him how much have they got agreed in principle and he said that is not information that he can disclose.
Is this normal practice for an estate agent?
Reason I am asking is why the secrecy? Is he bound by some legal or moral code not to disclose the maximum level that has been agreed in principle?
I had sold a house recently in London with another agent in a different area of London and that agent was quite happy to disclose the maximum amount that buyers have attained on their MIP.
I asked the estate agent if they have a mortgage agreed in principle and he said yes. I asked him how much deposit are they putting down, he said 200k but it may be less as they may want to keep some of the money back for doing the refurbishment and paying for the lease extension and major works bill.
I asked him how much have they got agreed in principle and he said that is not information that he can disclose.
Is this normal practice for an estate agent?
Reason I am asking is why the secrecy? Is he bound by some legal or moral code not to disclose the maximum level that has been agreed in principle?
I had sold a house recently in London with another agent in a different area of London and that agent was quite happy to disclose the maximum amount that buyers have attained on their MIP.
0
Comments
-
Aside from anything else that's expecting to enter a negotiation where you can see all of the other person's cards
0 -
teaselMay said:Aside from anything else that's expecting to enter a negotiation where you can see all of the other person's cards
the EA is supposed to be working for me as I am the one who is paying his commission and I feel it isn't fair that he is not giving me all the information I need to make a decision on whether or not to accept the offer.0 -
Does it matter what the mix of cash/mortgage is to you ? The buyer is free to arrange their personal finances as they wish.1
-
Be thankful they have 200k deposit or up to as that should make things more likely to complete.
Just entered the next phase and no you don't have any right to know the finite details or the make up of your buyers funds just the assurity that the solicitors are happy.1 -
TroubledTarts said:Be thankful they have 200k deposit or up to as that should make things more likely to complete.
Just entered the next phase and no you don't have any right to know the finite details or the make up of your buyers funds just the assurity that the solicitors are happy.
every time a transaction fail, you would have wasted 2 months at least, if not more and solicitors fees to boot, so I always check on the buyer credentials before I accept an offer to make sure they have buffer and less likely to be offering a bait offer, with the intention of reducing it later on in the process when they know you have less choice.
but it is interesting to hear that you think sellers are not entitled to know the buyers' financial credetials and that is kept a secret. Maybe it shouldn't be? and there would be less messing around by buyers if the sellers are fully informed of their financial status?0 -
Hoenir said:Does it matter what the mix of cash/mortgage is to you ? The buyer is free to arrange their personal finances as they wish.0
-
They can't divulge the information unless the buyer wants to share (e.g. as part of the negotiation to show they are able to proceed and have low risk of issue if the lender valuation comes in a bit low).
I would just ask the estate agent whether the buyers have their finances in order and trust the estate agent. Remember the estate agent cares as much as you about this as they only get paid if it completes.
The fact they have 200k and are considering using less suggests they have some 'buffer' if there are issues. This is a good thing and much better than an FTB maxing out their budget.
Also, frankly, a mortgage in principle just requires someone to ask for a quote and pass some basic checks. It doesn't really prove much. Nor does a buyer saying they have access to more funds.1 -
Gentoo365 said:They can't divulge the information unless the buyer wants to share (e.g. as part of the negotiation to show they are able to proceed and have low risk of issue if the lender valuation comes in a bit low).
I would just ask the estate agent whether the buyers have their finances in order and trust the estate agent. Remember the estate agent cares as much as you about this as they only get paid if it completes.
The fact they have 200k and are considering using less suggests they have some 'buffer' if there are issues. This is a good thing and much better than an FTB maxing out their budget.
to them it isn't a big issue as they don't lose any money if the transaction fail, unlike the seller.
A high MIP means that they have a high credit worthiness so it shows how much they can raise. If someone has a low MIP, then that is all they can raise and no more based on their financial situation. So it is important to choose someone who has a good ability to raise funds.0 -
If you want to be sure of their financial situation instruct your solicitor to do nothing first before confirming your buyers situation with their solicitor before spending any money on anything else.1
-
TroubledTarts said:If you want to be sure of their financial situation instruct your solicitor to do nothing first before confirming your buyers situation with their solicitor before spending any money on anything else.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards