PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Conveyancer Errors

Options
To keep it brief, my experiences with conveyancers have been rather frustrating. Years ago, I purchased a leasehold property with the assistance of Conveyancer A. Recently, I sold this property using Conveyancer B, and during the sales process, it became clear that Conveyancer A had failed to properly review the lease. Consequently, my buyer's solicitor required indemnity policies.

I eventually sold the property after obtaining the necessary indemnity policies. I reached out to Conveyancer A to ask why these issues weren't identified during the purchase process, and they agreed to cover the cost of the indemnity policies. However, they added that this reimbursement was “By way of full and final settlement of all claims, we can transfer to you £X.”

Could my buyer potentially make a future claim against me? So accepting the settlement terms isn't a good idea.

Comments

  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,840 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 29 January at 10:13AM

    Could my buyer potentially make a future claim against me? So accepting the settlement terms isn't a good idea.
    What claims could your buyer make? They accepted the property with the indemnity policies. Any claim against Conveyancer A would be for your own losses (e.g. having to sell at a lower price). So are you sure you've got everything you're entitled to?

    In any event, surely Conveyancer B is the place to go for such advice, given they understand what the issue is?
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,009 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    The buyer can only really make a future claim against you, if you've said something that is misleading or untrue (and probably only if what you said was part of the contract).

    For example, if you said something in the pre-contract forms or in reply to a pre-contract enquiry like "I've never had a dispute with my neighbours" - but that's not true.

    (And hopefully, your solicitor should be adding caveats to anything you say before passing it on to the buyer, to reduce the risk of future claims against you.)


    It's up to your buyer (and their solicitor) to read the lease and spot anything 'nasty' in it. You don't have to highlight it to them.


    Out of interest, what kind of things did Conveyancer A fail to spot in your lease?


  • JustinTime19
    JustinTime19 Posts: 89 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks for your comments.

    Conveyancer B has made their own errors and cost me a lot of money -  I don't want to engage any further for advice from them. My case is likely to progress to the legal ombudsman.

    Conveyancer A failed to spot terms that wouldn't have been acceptable to a mortgage company. (Ability for freeholder to claim property in the event the ground rent wasn't paid without notifying mortgage company and also that the apartment building was on land that had a covenant to not build on it).
  • AskAsk
    AskAsk Posts: 3,048 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 29 January at 12:18PM
    Thanks for your comments.

    Conveyancer B has made their own errors and cost me a lot of money -  I don't want to engage any further for advice from them. My case is likely to progress to the legal ombudsman.

    Conveyancer A failed to spot terms that wouldn't have been acceptable to a mortgage company. (Ability for freeholder to claim property in the event the ground rent wasn't paid without notifying mortgage company and also that the apartment building was on land that had a covenant to not build on it).
    keep us updated on what results with the ombudsman.  i had experience with them recently and i found them very disappointing.  they helped the bungling solicitor rather than me and only awarded a very small compensation sum for a huge costly mistake.

    i decided not to progress to civil court as with the ombudsman decision already in place, i doubt a civil court judge is going to overturn it.

    i think as a minimum recompense, when a solicitor makes a bungling mistake, they should return their fees for the work as a minimum.  it is just all wrong that these solicitors are not held accountable for their mistakes.
  • JustinTime19
    JustinTime19 Posts: 89 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    I have now raised a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman about Conveyancer B, completing the online form was enough to put me off. I don't have much confidence that I will see much success - Trustpilot reviews of the Legal Ombudsman doesn't look good.

    I wonder whether I should try small claims court, based on my experience I can't imagine the other party would read the notice/turn up which could lead the outcome in my favour. 
  • AskAsk
    AskAsk Posts: 3,048 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    I have now raised a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman about Conveyancer B, completing the online form was enough to put me off. I don't have much confidence that I will see much success - Trustpilot reviews of the Legal Ombudsman doesn't look good.

    I wonder whether I should try small claims court, based on my experience I can't imagine the other party would read the notice/turn up which could lead the outcome in my favour. 
    you can only claim for loss and in this case, the loss is the cost of indemnity policy, so if you go to the small claims court, that is all you can claim.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.