We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
MPAA triggered is the pension taxed twice?
NickNick74
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hi,
I Triggered my MPAA but continue to work and pay into a pension scheme. Over the period of a year, the first £10k is tax free but the remaining £7k is taxed at 40%. The £2800 tax due is paid direct to HMRC via schemes Pays under a self-assessment submission. When I finally retire, that new pot will be classed as a taxable income and taxed accordingly. Therefore that £7000 each year is eventually going to be taxed twice. Is that correct?
I Triggered my MPAA but continue to work and pay into a pension scheme. Over the period of a year, the first £10k is tax free but the remaining £7k is taxed at 40%. The £2800 tax due is paid direct to HMRC via schemes Pays under a self-assessment submission. When I finally retire, that new pot will be classed as a taxable income and taxed accordingly. Therefore that £7000 each year is eventually going to be taxed twice. Is that correct?
0
Comments
-
No. Have a look at the first paragraph on page 3: https://www.investcentre.co.uk/sites/default/files/AJBIC_Scheme_pays_guide.pdfNickNick74 said:Hi,
I Triggered my MPAA but continue to work and pay into a pension scheme. Over the period of a year, the first £10k is tax free but the remaining £7k is taxed at 40%. The £2800 tax due is paid direct to HMRC via schemes Pays under a self-assessment submission. When I finally retire, that new pot will be classed as a taxable income and taxed accordingly. Therefore that £7000 each year is eventually going to be taxed twice. Is that correct?Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!0 -
Is there any clue as to what the Chancellor with do with the MPAA for the next budget 2025. Keep it at £10000 or lower it and tax more tax?0
-
*take more tax0
-
Funny you should mention it but I've heard Rachel Reeves is currently deciding which of these three options to go with.NickNick74 said:Is there any clue as to what the Chancellor with do with the MPAA for the next budget 2025. Keep it at £10000 or lower it and tax more tax?
1. Leave it the same
2. Increase it
3. Decrease it
I suspect you will find out the answer the same time as the rest of us.0 -
Possibly, yes. Did you get tax relief when you made the contributions? Less tax, so more in your take home pay because of your pension contributions. The 40% penalty is designed to cancel out the tax relief received by a 40% taxpayer. If you are (or would have been but for the pension contribs) a 40% taxpayer, then you haven't lost out. Everyone is liable for tax when they draw their pension. It is treated as income.
If you are only a 20% taxpayer then the penalty is more than the benefit. Could still be useful as there are benefits to having the money wrapped in a pension. Or if your employer is paying contributions dependent on yours, it could be worth taking the hit. However, it is unlikely you would benefit by making optional, unmatched contributions above the MPAA unless you are a 40% taxpayer.
Below MPAA: Tax relief on the way in; some tax paid on the way out
Above MPAA, 40% taxpayer: No tax relief on the way in; some tax paid on the way out
Above MPAA, 20% taxpayer: Penalty exceeds tax relief on the way in; some tax paid on the way out
This is a practical, man-in-the-street description of the end result, not a pedantically perfect statement of the law.
0 -
Notably, from the quoted AJB paper:Marcon said:
No. Have a look at the first paragraph on page 3: https://www.investcentre.co.uk/sites/default/files/AJBIC_Scheme_pays_guide.pdfNickNick74 said:Hi,
I Triggered my MPAA but continue to work and pay into a pension scheme. Over the period of a year, the first £10k is tax free but the remaining £7k is taxed at 40%. The £2800 tax due is paid direct to HMRC via schemes Pays under a self-assessment submission. When I finally retire, that new pot will be classed as a taxable income and taxed accordingly. Therefore that £7000 each year is eventually going to be taxed twice. Is that correct?
True enough as far as it goes. However, aside from any PCLS, future withdrawals from this pension will be taxable, so that the OP then effectively pays tax on a tranche of post-tax money. Real double-tax then, albeit on less than the full £7k over-contributed.An important point to remember is that the annual allowance charge is not penal, it is simply reclaiming the tax relief that the individual is not entitled to above the annual allowance. Effectively this means that the excess pension contribution is not tax-relieved.1 -
How does the penalty exceed the tax relief? It's at marginal rate, not fixed at 40%.Secret2ndAccount said:Possibly, yes. Did you get tax relief when you made the contributions? Less tax, so more in your take home pay because of your pension contributions. The 40% penalty is designed to cancel out the tax relief received by a 40% taxpayer. If you are (or would have been but for the pension contribs) a 40% taxpayer, then you haven't lost out. Everyone is liable for tax when they draw their pension. It is treated as income.
If you are only a 20% taxpayer then the penalty is more than the benefit. Could still be useful as there are benefits to having the money wrapped in a pension. Or if your employer is paying contributions dependent on yours, it could be worth taking the hit. However, it is unlikely you would benefit by making optional, unmatched contributions above the MPAA unless you are a 40% taxpayer.
Below MPAA: Tax relief on the way in; some tax paid on the way out
Above MPAA, 40% taxpayer: No tax relief on the way in; some tax paid on the way out
Above MPAA, 20% taxpayer: Penalty exceeds tax relief on the way in; some tax paid on the way out
This is a practical, man-in-the-street description of the end result, not a pedantically perfect statement of the law.
In any case, it's clearly double taxation as no relief means you're taxed on the way in and also on the way out.0 -
It might in some cases, at least AIUI, as the MPAA allowance charge is added to your taxable income, so if that then takes you over the HRT threshold, you'll pay tax at 40% on the amount over the threshold........but you may only have received tax relief at basic rate (20%).
Plus there are other implications as well for exceeding the HR threshold.....though these are not directly related to the MPAA.
0 -
Hi,
So the short answer is ‘yes’. Pension contributions over the current MPAA (£7000) gets taxed at my HR of 40%. That’s paid via schemes pays. Then when I do withdraw it further down the line when I retire, it will all get taxed. Despite having previously paid tax on the (£7000) annually.0 -
This is the point of the MPAA to discourage you from going above it by penalising you for doing so. Its the same as the AA.
Nothing stops you going above them but doing so is a disadvantage and with Pensions become subject to IHT soon, there is very little reason to break them. Due to Employer contributions may be worth it ? I haven't worked out the figures.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards