📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Money Moral Dilemma: A fire at my house damaged my neighbour's place - should I pay for the repairs?

123457»

Comments

  • BethRobinson
    BethRobinson Posts: 58 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    More made up "genuine dilemmas"
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,723 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Stelly21 said:
    The fire as you say was an accident and people have house insurance to cover these issues. I think it's unfair of them to ask you to pay £300 just because it happens to be the same amount as there excess. They agreed to that excess so they need to pay it. What's crazy is that you don't have house insurance, know that's playing with fire!
    I agree to an excess on the assumption that it will be an issue with my house I need to pay for. I'd be pretty hacked off if a neighbour without insurance thought they were able to skip that and after causing damage to my house not have any comeback. There have been fire incidents in our street, not that they were uninsured to my knowledge but where a fire in one caused damage to adjacent houses that rendered them unoccupied for 12 months. If the person causing it wasn't insured and made no effort to cover losses it certainly wouldn't result in good neighbourly relations.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 5,791 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Saragon said:
    Of course you should pay.
    the fire was in your house. Accident or not it happened on your property. If you had insurance they would claim against your insurance and as you don’t it makes you personally liable.
    No they wouldn't and no it doesn't. (Probably).
  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 5,791 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    jimjames said:
    Stelly21 said:
    The fire as you say was an accident and people have house insurance to cover these issues. I think it's unfair of them to ask you to pay £300 just because it happens to be the same amount as there excess. They agreed to that excess so they need to pay it. What's crazy is that you don't have house insurance, know that's playing with fire!
    I agree to an excess on the assumption that it will be an issue with my house I need to pay for. I'd be pretty hacked off if a neighbour without insurance thought they were able to skip that and after causing damage to my house not have any comeback. There have been fire incidents in our street, not that they were uninsured to my knowledge but where a fire in one caused damage to adjacent houses that rendered them unoccupied for 12 months. If the person causing it wasn't insured and made no effort to cover losses it certainly wouldn't result in good neighbourly relations.
    You didn't though. You have to pay your excess of your burgled, or flooded, or your house is damaged by a storm or lightening, all of which are external causes and not issues with your house, still less your fault. Fire is generally no different, whether it starts internally or externally.

    Your neighbours insurance won't cover damage to your house though, absent evidence of negligence on your neighbour's part, which would be unusual. So you'd be reliant on your neighbours generosity for your excess whether he was insured or not. I'm the event of a fire that guess your house and left it unoccupied for 12n months your certainly be claiming in your own insurance, as your neighbours generosity is never going to stretch that far.

    Personally I think expecting your neighbour (or anyone else) to compensate you for things for which he want to blame isn't very reasonable and not good for neighborhood relations.
  • Unless £300 is a big burden, I'd pay or certainly something towards it. I don't care what the law says, there's common decency. Are your neighbours decent, who take in post for you, let you borrow a jug of milk or lawnmower etc? Unless they're horrible people, this damage wasn't their fault. Maybe not yours, but 100% not theirs. 
    Being horrible about this will mean there will forever be an atmosphere of distrust. 
  • Greengirl24
    Greengirl24 Posts: 10 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary
    edited 5 February at 12:45PM
    I had a similar situation with a leaky 
    shared porch/hall roof. I organised a buider to fix it and agreed with my elderly neighbour that we would share costs. I got home from a week away to discover her son had done a bodge job and wanted £100 reimbursement for materials. Neither I nor my builder was best pleased. I coughed up and when the roof leaked again after 6 years, it cost £650 to fix (and 3 months to find another builder). She paid her share without complaint. This is about good relationships with neighbours.  You can buy a good house, but good neighbours need to be cultivated! 


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.