Natwest ridiculous accusation of fraud

2»

Comments

  • Ayr_Rage
    Ayr_Rage Posts: 2,323 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Well done Natwest for flagging suspicious transactions.

    You'll just have to wait out the investigation.
  • auser99
    auser99 Posts: 271 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 25 January at 9:04PM
    A big amount of cash going into an account then almost instantly being sent out is a textbook alarm bell ringing job.
    Not surprised for that to be flagged, as innocent as the explanation sounds!

  • 7sefton
    7sefton Posts: 633 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Classic scam behaviour. And suspicious you were ‘with her’ when the bank called. 
  • boingy
    boingy Posts: 1,821 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    I get that it looks odd to a bank but can someone explain exactly how transferring money from one account to another and back again can be a scam? If the amount is the same and it ends up back in the account it originally came from isn't that the same as not having made any transfers? I don't see how it can be a scam.
  • Kim_13
    Kim_13 Posts: 3,210 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    boingy said:
    I get that it looks odd to a bank but can someone explain exactly how transferring money from one account to another and back again can be a scam? If the amount is the same and it ends up back in the account it originally came from isn't that the same as not having made any transfers? I don't see how it can be a scam.
    Not a scam but a potential sign of money laundering, which they are also required to look out for.

    They would expect for example multiple transfers (easy enough for someone to transfer less than needed to a bills account for example and then realise their mistake) or to send too much and return the excess. Not returning the whole amount - and if paying in cash instead was mentioned when they called to ask about it then the first thing that might come to the bank’s mind would be that that is less traceable. 

    Identifying something unusual is done by a computer - so undoing something doesn’t mean it never happened. It then falls to a human to satisfy themselves that the activity will not land the bank in hot water if no action is taken. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.