We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Capital Gains Tax evidence for HMRC
Options

LalaandPo
Posts: 2 Newbie

in Cutting tax
I have recently sold a property that was owned jointly by me and my late husband (it was intended as our retirement home but that was not to be). As we never actually lived in the property there is a CGT liability. The Accountant wants the Settlement Statement from date of purchase in 1999, but I just cannot find it! The solicitors do not keep records back that far. I wonder if there is a record of average conveyancing charges anywhere and if so, would this be acceptable to HMRC?
0
Comments
-
House Price tracking websites and I think the Land Registry should have the purchase price info?0
-
I'm not aware of any who keeps a history of average conveyancing costs, or survey costs (which you might also have paid and which are deductable).
I had to pay CGT a few years back on a rental property I bought in 1995, and so I was able to check what I paid for conveyancing and surveys. It was £588 in total, but the house was quite cheap. I also had retained the completion statement so I could be certain of these figures.
I think it likely that you might have paid £600 for conveyancing and £400 for a survey, £1000 total, but I'm guessing these figures.
The easiest option is not to claim any deductions for conveyancing or surveys. CGT is only 18-24%, so you are only saving yourself about £250. The other option is to estimate (guess) what you paid, but keep it low so that HMRC don't see it as out of the ordinary. They will have an idea of what fees will have been charged in 1999, and if you try to claim that you paid a lot for the conveyancing or surveys, I expect they will investigate.
Ultimtely you in the hands of your solicitor as to what they are prepared to do. Clearly, going in with a zero figure for deductions is the safest for them, but disadvantages you. You'll have to talk to them to see what they are prepared to do.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.1 -
0
-
sheramber said:0
-
have you not kept your bank statements? At least that would show the amount actually paid.0
-
Bookworm105 said:have you not kept your bank statements? At least that would show the amount actually paid.0
-
LalaandPo said:Bookworm105 said:have you not kept your bank statements? At least that would show the amount actually paid.
i have all mine from when I opened my first account in 1982
I think you will struggle to justify any claimed costs in the absence of actual evidence as HMRC is quite strict on making sure the costs are "correct" - ie relate to the actual purchase itself
As others mention, you can of course shove in any old amount on the basis it is a gamble whether your return will be selected for actual inspection, most are not.
CG15250 - Expenditure: incidental costs of acquisition and disposal - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK
CG15260 - Incidental costs of acquisition and disposal: specific examples - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards