We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Booking.com room not as described (County Aparthotel, Newcastle)
Options
Comments
-
eskbanker said:I wasn't comparing small double with single!
I was highlighting that small double on the booking page equates to standard double on the main page, but more importantly (and separately), that the photo of the single room looks like what you were given.
That single room actually looks bigger than the room we got0 -
itm2 said:They're certainly pretty similar! The "small double" room has a TV in the space where the single room has a dressing table, so they're not identical, but the bed definitely looks the same.
I suspect they'll just ignore my email, which I can't do much about, so I'll just have to put it down to experience. I think I'll think twice before using booking.com to book a hotel again, though
In the "city single room" on the website, the headboard looks to be almost square.
In the "standard double room" on the website, the headboard looks to be rectangular.
I assume your photo is not distorted by being resized but not keeping ratio.
This whole thing that you booked a double room and received a single seems to be the crux of the matter.
Far more than understanding terminology around one type of double room or another.2 -
Using the simple method of counting the "buttons" across the width of the headboard - the headboard of the "city single room" is 6 buttons wide, and the "standard double room" 7 buttons wide. Our headboard was 6 buttons wide.
So yes, it does rather seem as if we really were in a single room.
I might throw this back at the hotel and advise them that, in the absence of a response to me email, I'll be asking my card provider for a refund.
0 -
itm2 said:Using the simple method of counting the "buttons" across the width of the headboard - the headboard of the "city single room" is 6 buttons wide, and the "standard double room" 7 buttons wide. Our headboard was 6 buttons wide.
So yes, it does rather seem as if we really were in a single room.
I might throw this back at the hotel and advise them that, in the absence of a response to me email, I'll be asking my card provider for a refund.2 -
eskbanker said:I wasn't comparing small double with single!
I was highlighting that small double on the booking page equates to standard double on the main page, but more importantly (and separately), that the photo of the single room looks like what you were given.
The "small double" appears also to be a "standard double"
But what the OP got looks like just a single room and not either type of double.
I'd want to pursue this with the hotel0 -
In the absence of any reply to my email, I sent the hotel another one earlier. I told them that, since they hadn't bothered to reply to my complaint, I would be asking my card provider for a refund.
Within half an hour I got a reply:
"We do apologise for the inconvenience; we've forwarded your email to the higher management and someone will get back to you in the next few days."
In the meantime I've disputed the transaction with the card provider (Chase) anyway, submitting the photos and booking information as evidence.
Let's see what happens....2 -
HillStreetBlues said:That can not be right, that would mean Booking.com could charge everyone for a double room book a smaller room (which is what happened) as then claim it's nothing to do with them.
If you book a double and Booking.com send the booking over to the hotel as a double but the hotel give you a single that is the hotel's responsibility.
Chances are Booking.com's process are efficient and their errors are less likely but if the hotel says it's Booking.com's fault I'd expect them to show the customer that is the case.
Of course you'd expect Booking.com to do the same in reverse but they are a big faceless company whereas a hotel is customer facing and typically used to providing a high level of service to it's guests.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
Okell said:Alderbank said:Okell said:The OP says that the hotel website advertises "standard double rooms" and "small double rooms" separately
Have they backtracked since then?
https://www.booking.com/hotel/gb/mercure-newcastle-county-hotel.en-gb.html?aid=311076&label=hotel-220616-gb-cM5NwszhlNCJImOCMVg6hAS582533921162:pl:ta:p1:p21,093,000:ac:ap:neg:fi:tikwd-15255469883:lp9193090:li:dec:dm:ppccp=UmFuZG9tSVYkc2RlIyh9YVujEjbMrKBVEQO8hCDrg-c&sid=7e94426291febdac2356aa873a094aa6&dest_id=-2603966&dest_type=city&dist=0&group_adults=2&group_children=0&hapos=1&hpos=1&no_rooms=1&req_adults=2&req_children=0&room1=A,A&sb_price_type=total&sr_order=popularity&srepoch=1737793904&srpvid=6a7f3bf4737b016a&type=total&ucfs=1&Life in the slow lane0 -
Okell said:Alderbank said:They might have done. My quote was their second post on page 1.
So in one post the hotel does advertise a standard double, in another post they don't... [Sigh]
A lot of hotel ones do show but as unavailable
0 -
born_again said:Okell said:Alderbank said:Okell said:The OP says that the hotel website advertises "standard double rooms" and "small double rooms" separately
Have they backtracked since then?
https://www.booking.com/hotel/gb/mercure-newcastle-county-hotel.en-gb.html?aid=311076&label=hotel-220616-gb-cM5NwszhlNCJImOCMVg6hAS582533921162:pl:ta:p1:p21,093,000:ac:ap:neg:fi:tikwd-15255469883:lp9193090:li:dec:dm:ppccp=UmFuZG9tSVYkc2RlIyh9YVujEjbMrKBVEQO8hCDrg-c&sid=7e94426291febdac2356aa873a094aa6&dest_id=-2603966&dest_type=city&dist=0&group_adults=2&group_children=0&hapos=1&hpos=1&no_rooms=1&req_adults=2&req_children=0&room1=A,A&sb_price_type=total&sr_order=popularity&srepoch=1737793904&srpvid=6a7f3bf4737b016a&type=total&ucfs=1&
It seems that neither Booking.com nor the hotel are taking this seriously
( It is possible that idiotic bots are involved)
A chargeback as the OP has done is the best way of making sure that someone who understands the reputational risks looks at the situation0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards