We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Old Credit Card Debt Advice...



Apologies if this is not he right place for this query.
My query is for advice regarding a fraudulent debt incurred on a credit card back in 2007.
A bit of background:
Many Thanks.
Comments
-
Send them a statute barred letter, use a template from a site like step change which will be worded correctly to avoid any issue of admitting the debt - they're almost certainly trying it on after buying the debts for pennies
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
0
-
Hello All and @Nasqueron,
I found the following template - would be sufficient for the task:
~~~~~~~~~~~Dear Sirs,Statute barred debtRef: xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I do not admit liability for this debt, and I do not intend to make any further payments to it for the following reasons:- The earliest point at which you could have sued for the full balance owing to this debt was more than six years ago-- No payment has been made to this debt by me, any joint account-holder, or any third party acting as my agent for a period of more than six years- No written admission of liability for this debt has been made by me, or any third party acting as my agent for a period of more than six yearsThis debt is therefore statute barred and any court claim to recover it will be defended on this basis.If you have evidence that this debt isn’t statute barred, please send it to me within 21 days.Otherwise, please confirm in writing that you won’t pursue me further for this debt.Yours faithfully
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am a bit concerned with the statement "...and i do not intend to make any further payment to it..." when I have never made any payments in the past.
Thank you for your help.0 -
You could just remove "further" and the wording would still make sense
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards