We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Limited Grant
bikeman
Posts: 382 Forumite
My ex-wife died, intestate, a few months ago and left 2 daughters. She died intestate so it was the responsibility of her daughters apply for the grant. To allow me to administer the estate, daugher 1 with myself applied jointly for the grant and daughter 2 completed a PA12 for me to act as her attorney.
We were expecting both daughter 1 and myself to be named on the grant. The objective being that I could continue to administer and distribute the estate for them. Whilst daughter 1 retained responsibility and daughter 2 could revoke poa if necessary.
However, the probate office have now written to us asking if daughter 1 wants to be solely named on the grant or for the joint application to proceed and her to consent to the grant being a limited one solely for the use and benefit of daughter 2. There is no mention of my joint application.
What does a 'limited grant' mean in this context? Why are they suggesting this when there is no dispute? Googling suggests that a limited grant might prevent the distribution of assets.
We were expecting both daughter 1 and myself to be named on the grant. The objective being that I could continue to administer and distribute the estate for them. Whilst daughter 1 retained responsibility and daughter 2 could revoke poa if necessary.
However, the probate office have now written to us asking if daughter 1 wants to be solely named on the grant or for the joint application to proceed and her to consent to the grant being a limited one solely for the use and benefit of daughter 2. There is no mention of my joint application.
What does a 'limited grant' mean in this context? Why are they suggesting this when there is no dispute? Googling suggests that a limited grant might prevent the distribution of assets.
0
Comments
-
Odd, as this is an intestate estate it should be letters of administration that are being obtained rather than grant of probate and I can’t find any reference to limited LoA.0
-
Yes it is an LoA application but even the probate office refers to this as 'the grant'.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
