📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Please respond to CMA consultation to put an end to restaurants' additional "service charges"

Options
13»

Comments

  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,493 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    NFH said:
    NFH said:
    Plus "transaction fee" £1.50 per order for actually paying
    Fees for paying by card have been outlawed 
    Except it was not a fee for paying by card.
    It was a fee for paying.  Simply for paying.  By any means.
    Please read the legislation: "A payee must not charge a payer any fee in respect of payment by means of — a payment instrument which — (i) is a card-based payment instrument".

    You missed the rest of the legislation...
    Life in the slow lane
  • the_lunatic_is_in_my_head
    the_lunatic_is_in_my_head Posts: 9,294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 2 January at 10:41AM
    There was a new law that came into force in Oct 2024, guidance here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/distributing-tips-fairly-statutory-code-of-practice/code-of-practice-on-fair-and-transparent-distribution-of-tips-html-version

    which means 100% of all tips, included voluntary* service charges, must be given to workers, I do wonder if this new piece of law will, over time, change how often these charges are seen in restaurants.

    *I'm not sure about mandatory charges but from what OP has said a mandatory charge will have to be in the price according to the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024? 
    In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces
  • NFH
    NFH Posts: 4,413 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    NFH said:
    NFH said:
    Plus "transaction fee" £1.50 per order for actually paying
    Fees for paying by card have been outlawed 
    Except it was not a fee for paying by card.
    It was a fee for paying.  Simply for paying.  By any means.
    Please read the legislation: "A payee must not charge a payer any fee in respect of payment by means of — a payment instrument which — (i) is a card-based payment instrument".

    You missed the rest of the legislation...
    Yes, deliberately. I quoted only the relevant part. But linked inline to the legislation so that everyone can read the rest if they wish.
  • NFH
    NFH Posts: 4,413 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    There was a new law that came into force in Oct 2024, guidance here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/distributing-tips-fairly-statutory-code-of-practice/code-of-practice-on-fair-and-transparent-distribution-of-tips-html-version

    which means 100% of all tips, included voluntary* service charges, must be given to workers, I do wonder if this new piece of law will, over time, change how often these charges are seen in restaurants.
    You make a good point. Given that restaurants can no longer retain any part of these so-called service charges, it removes one of the incentives for restaurants to operate this system. The primary remaining incentive is a misleading indication of price in order to distort competition.

  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,493 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    NFH said:
    There was a new law that came into force in Oct 2024, guidance here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/distributing-tips-fairly-statutory-code-of-practice/code-of-practice-on-fair-and-transparent-distribution-of-tips-html-version

    which means 100% of all tips, included voluntary* service charges, must be given to workers, I do wonder if this new piece of law will, over time, change how often these charges are seen in restaurants.
    You make a good point. Given that restaurants can no longer retain any part of these so-called service charges, it removes one of the incentives for restaurants to operate this system. The primary remaining incentive is a misleading indication of price in order to distort competition.

    Yet I can see the reverse.
    They use the service charge to help pay the staff, while still retaining their profit margin. If they remove service charge, then they have to increase prices to keep the status que.

    People notice increased prices, when looking at the door & will vote with their feet. While missing the service charge at the end.
    Life in the slow lane
  • NFH
    NFH Posts: 4,413 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    NFH said:
    There was a new law that came into force in Oct 2024, guidance here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/distributing-tips-fairly-statutory-code-of-practice/code-of-practice-on-fair-and-transparent-distribution-of-tips-html-version

    which means 100% of all tips, included voluntary* service charges, must be given to workers, I do wonder if this new piece of law will, over time, change how often these charges are seen in restaurants.
    You make a good point. Given that restaurants can no longer retain any part of these so-called service charges, it removes one of the incentives for restaurants to operate this system. The primary remaining incentive is a misleading indication of price in order to distort competition.

    Yet I can see the reverse.
    They use the service charge to help pay the staff, while still retaining their profit margin. If they remove service charge, then they have to increase prices to keep the status que.
    If a restaurant's so-called service charge is 12.5%, then staff receive 11.1% of the total price of meals. It's a form of profit related pay. There's no reason why this 11.1% profit related pay couldn't continue if the menu shows the total price of each product.
    People notice increased prices, when looking at the door & will vote with their feet. While missing the service charge at the end.
    Exactly. That's why restaurants want to reduce their prices below the prices that diners will ultimately be billed. It's a misleading indication of price, whose effect is to distort competition.
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    NFH said:
    NFH said:
    There was a new law that came into force in Oct 2024, guidance here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/distributing-tips-fairly-statutory-code-of-practice/code-of-practice-on-fair-and-transparent-distribution-of-tips-html-version

    which means 100% of all tips, included voluntary* service charges, must be given to workers, I do wonder if this new piece of law will, over time, change how often these charges are seen in restaurants.
    You make a good point. Given that restaurants can no longer retain any part of these so-called service charges, it removes one of the incentives for restaurants to operate this system. The primary remaining incentive is a misleading indication of price in order to distort competition.

    Yet I can see the reverse.
    They use the service charge to help pay the staff, while still retaining their profit margin. If they remove service charge, then they have to increase prices to keep the status que.
    If a restaurant's so-called service charge is 12.5%, then staff receive 11.1% of the total price of meals. It's a form of profit related pay. There's no reason why this 11.1% profit related pay couldn't continue if the menu shows the total price of each product.
    Well other than the fact that discretionary service charges are not subject to VAT so you'd need to increase the prices by 15% to maintain the staff getting the same amount of cash and HMRC would also be getting an extra slice which it currently isnt entitled to. 
  • NFH
    NFH Posts: 4,413 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    NFH said:
    NFH said:
    There was a new law that came into force in Oct 2024, guidance here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/distributing-tips-fairly-statutory-code-of-practice/code-of-practice-on-fair-and-transparent-distribution-of-tips-html-version

    which means 100% of all tips, included voluntary* service charges, must be given to workers, I do wonder if this new piece of law will, over time, change how often these charges are seen in restaurants.
    You make a good point. Given that restaurants can no longer retain any part of these so-called service charges, it removes one of the incentives for restaurants to operate this system. The primary remaining incentive is a misleading indication of price in order to distort competition.

    Yet I can see the reverse.
    They use the service charge to help pay the staff, while still retaining their profit margin. If they remove service charge, then they have to increase prices to keep the status que.
    If a restaurant's so-called service charge is 12.5%, then staff receive 11.1% of the total price of meals. It's a form of profit related pay. There's no reason why this 11.1% profit related pay couldn't continue if the menu shows the total price of each product.
    Well other than the fact that discretionary service charges are not subject to VAT so you'd need to increase the prices by 15% to maintain the staff getting the same amount of cash and HMRC would also be getting an extra slice which it currently isnt entitled to. 
    Yes, that's how it works in every other European country, although VAT rates are sometimes lower on restaurants. As well as facilitating a misleading indication of price, these so-called service charges in the UK are a tax dodge.
  • Ectophile
    Ectophile Posts: 7,979 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    NFH said:
    NFH said:
    Plus "transaction fee" £1.50 per order for actually paying
    Fees for paying by card have been outlawed 
    Except it was not a fee for paying by card.
    It was a fee for paying.  Simply for paying.  By any means.
    Please read the legislation: "A payee must not charge a payer any fee in respect of payment by means of — a payment instrument which — (i) is a card-based payment instrument".

    Hmmm - it seems as though that excerpt prohibits this type of charge.
    Odd that this type of charge is widespread when buying tickets and nothing we can do about it.

    Because it's a fee that everybody has to pay, regardless of what payment method they use.  The regulations are to prehibit surcharges for paying by card.
    Perhaps you would argue that it's not permissable for a seller to charge post & packing if you pay by card, because that's a fee?
    If it sticks, force it.
    If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.