We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
LG cant/wont resolve OLED TV issue
Comments
-
Ivegotaquestion2 said:Alderbank said:To simplify your first post:
- In April you bought a TV and a soundbar from Currys.
- LG have investigated and concluded that the soundbar is faulty but the TV is not faulty.
- You don't think the soundbar is faulty, you believe it's the TV.
It's likely that Curry's will accept the manufacturer's investigation and replace the soundbar but not the TV. If the issue persisted I think they would simply tell you to return the soundbar for a full refund for it. They still won't replace the TV if LG say the fault is with the soundbar and on that evidence I don't think you would have a case to take them to court.
Your only option then would be to obtain an independent report that the TV does have an inherent fault somewhere in the HDMI port which has the eARC. Armed with that, you could go back to Currys.
You do need that 3rd party report though as evidence.
Your evidence that you have presented so far, that 'LG are being complete dicks', would not be enough in court.
Thankyou for the info, yes I realise dicks wont be a legally recognised term, I got a bit carried away!
Do you think the fact the newly replaced by Currys soundbar is working with other TVs would spur Currys to question LG's apparent stance on this? Would Currys refund a perfectly good item?
Trouble is I don't want a refund solely on the soundbar as that would still leave me with a TV that wont connect with an appropriate soundbar.Life in the slow lane2 -
Okell said:Ivegotaquestion2 said:Alderbank said:To simplify your first post:
- In April you bought a TV and a soundbar from Currys.
- LG have investigated and concluded that the soundbar is faulty but the TV is not faulty.
- You don't think the soundbar is faulty, you believe it's the TV.
It's likely that Curry's will accept the manufacturer's investigation and replace the soundbar but not the TV. If the issue persisted I think they would simply tell you to return the soundbar for a full refund for it. They still won't replace the TV if LG say the fault is with the soundbar and on that evidence I don't think you would have a case to take them to court.
Your only option then would be to obtain an independent report that the TV does have an inherent fault somewhere in the HDMI port which has the eARC. Armed with that, you could go back to Currys.
You do need that 3rd party report though as evidence.
Your evidence that you have presented so far, that 'LG are being complete dicks', would not be enough in court.
Thankyou for the info, yes I realise dicks wont be a legally recognised term, I got a bit carried away!
Do you think the fact the newly replaced by Currys soundbar is working with other TVs would spur Currys to question LG's apparent stance on this? Would Currys refund a perfectly good item?
Trouble is I don't want a refund solely on the soundbar as that would still leave me with a TV that wont connect with an appropriate soundbar.
Is there any way at all that you can establish that another soundbar - which works on another TV - doesn't work with your TV?
If you could do that I'd suggest it would be evidence that points pretty strongly at your TV being the problem and not the soundbar.
That might persuade Currys and if it didn't it might be enough to persuade a court... Possibly... Or possibly not - but it would help.1 -
Ivegotaquestion2 said:Okell said:Ivegotaquestion2 said:Alderbank said:To simplify your first post:
- In April you bought a TV and a soundbar from Currys.
- LG have investigated and concluded that the soundbar is faulty but the TV is not faulty.
- You don't think the soundbar is faulty, you believe it's the TV.
It's likely that Curry's will accept the manufacturer's investigation and replace the soundbar but not the TV. If the issue persisted I think they would simply tell you to return the soundbar for a full refund for it. They still won't replace the TV if LG say the fault is with the soundbar and on that evidence I don't think you would have a case to take them to court.
Your only option then would be to obtain an independent report that the TV does have an inherent fault somewhere in the HDMI port which has the eARC. Armed with that, you could go back to Currys.
You do need that 3rd party report though as evidence.
Your evidence that you have presented so far, that 'LG are being complete dicks', would not be enough in court.
Thankyou for the info, yes I realise dicks wont be a legally recognised term, I got a bit carried away!
Do you think the fact the newly replaced by Currys soundbar is working with other TVs would spur Currys to question LG's apparent stance on this? Would Currys refund a perfectly good item?
Trouble is I don't want a refund solely on the soundbar as that would still leave me with a TV that wont connect with an appropriate soundbar.
Is there any way at all that you can establish that another soundbar - which works on another TV - doesn't work with your TV?
If you could do that I'd suggest it would be evidence that points pretty strongly at your TV being the problem and not the soundbar.
That might persuade Currys and if it didn't it might be enough to persuade a court... Possibly... Or possibly not - but it would help.
If you can carry out a test that shows that a soundbar with no known problems doesn't work with your TV, that is evidence pointing towards a fault with your TV, not the soundbar.
PS - did you buy online or instore?2 -
Okell said:Ivegotaquestion2 said:Okell said:Ivegotaquestion2 said:Alderbank said:To simplify your first post:
- In April you bought a TV and a soundbar from Currys.
- LG have investigated and concluded that the soundbar is faulty but the TV is not faulty.
- You don't think the soundbar is faulty, you believe it's the TV.
It's likely that Curry's will accept the manufacturer's investigation and replace the soundbar but not the TV. If the issue persisted I think they would simply tell you to return the soundbar for a full refund for it. They still won't replace the TV if LG say the fault is with the soundbar and on that evidence I don't think you would have a case to take them to court.
Your only option then would be to obtain an independent report that the TV does have an inherent fault somewhere in the HDMI port which has the eARC. Armed with that, you could go back to Currys.
You do need that 3rd party report though as evidence.
Your evidence that you have presented so far, that 'LG are being complete dicks', would not be enough in court.
Thankyou for the info, yes I realise dicks wont be a legally recognised term, I got a bit carried away!
Do you think the fact the newly replaced by Currys soundbar is working with other TVs would spur Currys to question LG's apparent stance on this? Would Currys refund a perfectly good item?
Trouble is I don't want a refund solely on the soundbar as that would still leave me with a TV that wont connect with an appropriate soundbar.
Is there any way at all that you can establish that another soundbar - which works on another TV - doesn't work with your TV?
If you could do that I'd suggest it would be evidence that points pretty strongly at your TV being the problem and not the soundbar.
That might persuade Currys and if it didn't it might be enough to persuade a court... Possibly... Or possibly not - but it would help.
If you can carry out a test that shows that a soundbar with no known problems doesn't work with your TV, that is evidence pointing towards a fault with your TV, not the soundbar.
PS - did you buy online or instore?0 -
born_again said:Ivegotaquestion2 said:Alderbank said:To simplify your first post:
- In April you bought a TV and a soundbar from Currys.
- LG have investigated and concluded that the soundbar is faulty but the TV is not faulty.
- You don't think the soundbar is faulty, you believe it's the TV.
It's likely that Curry's will accept the manufacturer's investigation and replace the soundbar but not the TV. If the issue persisted I think they would simply tell you to return the soundbar for a full refund for it. They still won't replace the TV if LG say the fault is with the soundbar and on that evidence I don't think you would have a case to take them to court.
Your only option then would be to obtain an independent report that the TV does have an inherent fault somewhere in the HDMI port which has the eARC. Armed with that, you could go back to Currys.
You do need that 3rd party report though as evidence.
Your evidence that you have presented so far, that 'LG are being complete dicks', would not be enough in court.
Thankyou for the info, yes I realise dicks wont be a legally recognised term, I got a bit carried away!
Do you think the fact the newly replaced by Currys soundbar is working with other TVs would spur Currys to question LG's apparent stance on this? Would Currys refund a perfectly good item?
Trouble is I don't want a refund solely on the soundbar as that would still leave me with a TV that wont connect with an appropriate soundbar.
0 -
As asked earlier, did you buy online or in store? If in store, could you take your TV back to the store and ask them to try it out with (compatible) soundbars they have on display and currently working for them?
Doing that then I can't see how they could argue that the soundbar was at fault, as they were using that exact soundbar as a working demo unit.
Just a thought - may not be practical to do this.Jenni x2 -
Jenni_D said:As asked earlier, did you buy online or in store? If in store, could you take your TV back to the store and ask them to try it out with (compatible) soundbars they have on display and currently working for them?
Doing that then I can't see how they could argue that the soundbar was at fault, as they were using that exact soundbar as a working demo unit.
Just a thought - may not be practical to do this.0 -
Ivegotaquestion2 said:Jenni_D said:As asked earlier, did you buy online or in store? If in store, could you take your TV back to the store and ask them to try it out with (compatible) soundbars they have on display and currently working for them?
Doing that then I can't see how they could argue that the soundbar was at fault, as they were using that exact soundbar as a working demo unit.
Just a thought - may not be practical to do this.Life in the slow lane2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.2K Spending & Discounts
- 243.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards