We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum's text editor will shortly be getting an update, adding a bunch of handy new features to use when creating new posts. Read more in our how-to guide
The Top Regular Savers Discussion Thread
Comments
-
Kim_13 said:
The only thing I don't like about them is that you can't view/amend a maturity instruction online as you can with many others (which would surely be better than them sending out letters by post (which can't be cheap) in which they inexplicably add a zero to the nominated account number (no doubt causing those not familiar with it to worry, contact them and probably still worry until they receive their money.) They send another letter by post once the payment has been sent.surreysaver said:
Yes, agreed. You'd think they'd be old-fashioned if you didn't know them, but they're the good bits of old fashioned combined with modernityfriolento said:Love Principality. Good RS rates, so easy to give maturity instructions, so reliable in executing these, paying out promptly, even at weekends.
If you need to change or review your maturity instructions, surely you can just call them, or send an internal message? Also, how often do you need to change or review your maturity instructions?0 -
surreysaver said:
Yes, agreed. You'd think they'd be old-fashioned if you didn't know them, but they're the good bits of old fashioned combined with modernityfriolento said:Love Principality. Good RS rates, so easy to give maturity instructions, so reliable in executing these, paying out promptly, even at weekends.Principality are such a refreshing contrast compared to Scottish Building Society, who have possibly the clunkiest online banking website of any financial institution (with a strong whiff of 'overseen by MD': "No, no, the picture on the login screen still doesn't look big enough on my 4K screen" [1] — when good UI design should really have it that the actual login form is the primary focus of attention, not shunted partly out of the window in smaller browser windows), and who (inexplicably for any modern organisation which would want to grow its customer/deposit base) have most accounts as branch-only, despite having barely as many branches (not open at weekends, or in most cases, even at lunchtimes!) as Stoneybridge Building Society would have…[1] When many customers are probably using much lower resolution laptops2 -
Yep, would be great if they could find some way to cut down of the mailings. Am I right that some rule makes a paper mailing mandatory on an account closing? Every institution seems to do so, regardless of "paperless" settings?Kim_13 said:
The only thing I don't like about them is that you can't view/amend a maturity instruction online as you can with many others (which would surely be better than them sending out letters by post (which can't be cheap) in which they inexplicably add a zero to the nominated account number (no doubt causing those not familiar with it to worry, contact them and probably still worry until they receive their money.) They send another letter by post once the payment has been sent.surreysaver said:
Yes, agreed. You'd think they'd be old-fashioned if you didn't know them, but they're the good bits of old fashioned combined with modernityfriolento said:Love Principality. Good RS rates, so easy to give maturity instructions, so reliable in executing these, paying out promptly, even at weekends.2 -
Yes, I'd prefer a reduction in the amount of paper wastage - two recent maturities, so two sets of maturity instructions and leaflets, then another two sets of "thank you for submitting your maturity instructions" etc.Kim_13 said:
The only thing I don't like about them is that you can't view/amend a maturity instruction online as you can with many others (which would surely be better than them sending out letters by post (which can't be cheap) in which they inexplicably add a zero to the nominated account number (no doubt causing those not familiar with it to worry, contact them and probably still worry until they receive their money.) They send another letter by post once the payment has been sent.surreysaver said:
Yes, agreed. You'd think they'd be old-fashioned if you didn't know them, but they're the good bits of old fashioned combined with modernityfriolento said:Love Principality. Good RS rates, so easy to give maturity instructions, so reliable in executing these, paying out promptly, even at weekends.
And it would be nice to alter, or even just check, your maturity instructions online after submitting.
I reckon most of us would like to avoid direct contact, in case it draws attention to the number of accounts we have...friolento said:Kim_13 said:
The only thing I don't like about them is that you can't view/amend a maturity instruction online as you can with many others (which would surely be better than them sending out letters by post (which can't be cheap) in which they inexplicably add a zero to the nominated account number (no doubt causing those not familiar with it to worry, contact them and probably still worry until they receive their money.) They send another letter by post once the payment has been sent.surreysaver said:
Yes, agreed. You'd think they'd be old-fashioned if you didn't know them, but they're the good bits of old fashioned combined with modernityfriolento said:Love Principality. Good RS rates, so easy to give maturity instructions, so reliable in executing these, paying out promptly, even at weekends.
If you need to change or review your maturity instructions, surely you can just call them, or send an internal message? Also, how often do you need to change or review your maturity instructions?4 -
I think that's a quirk of the software they're using. Monmouthshire appears to use the same and has the same UI. https://myaccounts.monbs.com/Authentication/Login?ReturnUrl=/?david72 said:surreysaver said:
Yes, agreed. You'd think they'd be old-fashioned if you didn't know them, but they're the good bits of old fashioned combined with modernityfriolento said:Love Principality. Good RS rates, so easy to give maturity instructions, so reliable in executing these, paying out promptly, even at weekends.Principality are such a refreshing contrast compared to Scottish Building Society, who have possibly the clunkiest online banking website of any financial institution (with a strong whiff of 'overseen by MD': "No, no, the picture on the login screen still doesn't look big enough on my 4K screen" [1] — when good UI design should really have it that the actual login form is the primary focus of attention, not shunted partly out of the window in smaller browser windows), and who (inexplicably for any modern organisation which would want to grow its customer/deposit base) have most accounts as branch-only, despite having barely as many branches (not open at weekends, or in most cases, even at lunchtimes!) as Stoneybridge Building Society would have…[1] When many customers are probably using much lower resolution laptops0 -
Kim_13 said:
The only thing I don't like about them is that you can't view/amend a maturity instruction online as you can with many others....surreysaver said:
Yes, agreed. You'd think they'd be old-fashioned if you didn't know them, but they're the good bits of old fashioned combined with modernityfriolento said:Love Principality. Good RS rates, so easy to give maturity instructions, so reliable in executing these, paying out promptly, even at weekends.PrincipalityI agree with that, but I also have concerns about their 'Your transactions' listing in online banking. The number of transactions/oldest transaction available to view online seems to be variable, and there seems to be no way of viewing older transactions (even within the last 12 months) if the limit (whatever it is) has been exceeded. Clicking the link for "Print this page for your records" sometimes adds in some of the older transactions, but still not something the user can control.I've also got some examples where transactions have gone missing (i.e. there's a gap in the listing) since a previous download.I'm reluctant to bother customer services with a query about why this happens, and the "Request a statement" option on the 'Account Services' menu looks very much like it might generate a manual task in the back office, so again not an attractive option (especially if it produces another bit of paper).2 -
Pickledonionlover said:
Exactly what I do.PowerSavingMode said:
Yes, indeed.Bridlington1 said:
I must confess I'm running short of spare funds. I currently have a lot of capacity at 6% (driven largely by having Loughborough's 1YSS at 6% gobbling up £2k/mth) which is drawing a lot of funds out of my lower RSs to the point where I am now nibbling into the NatWest/RBS DRSs.clairec666 said:
Yes, I was thinking it had been quiet. Which is quite useful for me actually, because I don't really have the capacity for any extra accounts right now. Hopefully there'll be some good accounts that pop up in January, as my TSB 6% is maturing and their current offer is only 5%.Bridlington1 said:For the RS nerds among you, I thought I'd mention this:
It appears there's been something of a ``RS drought" of late. The eagle-eyed among you might've noticed that that there hasn't been a single RS launched that is eligible to enter p1 of my thread since 14th November.
If I am not mistaken the previous longest gap between eligible RSs being launched was in May, when there were no eligible RSs launched between 15th and 29th May inclusive.
If another RS isn't launched by the end of the month then that'll be the longest I've gone without adding a new RS to the list since I took over the thread, this could well happen given 1st December is Monday and it's rare RSs are launched over the weekend.
Moreover if you look at the accounts that have been added to p1 of the thread in most recent to oldest:
14/11/25- Newcastle & Manchester Festive RSs are branch opening only so most shan't've been able to open them.
11/11/25- The two Skipton RSs exclude those who hold RSs already unless they close their RSs first so I can imagine most shan't've opened them.
10/11/25- Mkt Harborough is branch opening only so again few shall've opened it.
You have to go back to 3rd November before you find a RS being launched that everyone was immediately eligible for and that could be opened online, but even that was only at 5% and its appeal may be limited given that it doesn't allow early withdrawals/closure.
From a mathematical/statistical viewpoint, there will always be natural peaks and troughs in activity throughout the year, but it might also be influenced by the upcoming base rate review.
December's RSs are proving to be a difficult balancing act in my case. I've just about managed to fund my accounts north of 5.5% this month but with next month's maturities I have are only enough to cover those north of 6% and about half of those at 6%. Then there's the complication that the BOE base rate could fall again next month, if it does then I'll be needing to speculate which accounts shall fall and by how much, possibly choosing to fund marginally lower RSs speculatively (as I sometimes did when interest rates were on the rise a few years back).
It's a nice problem to have though.Might I ask if anyone is bothering to fund cash ISAs — whether to fund regular savers or not?
At present, I am mostly using a flexible CASH ISA to fund my regular savers. As a F/T (unpaid) carer now, I only have income from regular savers and as much tax-free income from my small private pension as I can afford, plus occasional income withdrawn from a considerably smaller S&S ISA.
As the equivalent (accessible) savings product with a savings rate to beat the CASH ISA I have is 4.975%, I am wondering whether it is worth bothering transfer out to another flexible ISA with a higher rate (one that offer the equivalent of a 5.525% non-ISA saver -- for now!) as my bonus rate ends mid-Feb 2026. But I think I am overthinking and confusing myself...
Perhaps it makes more sense to just fund save RS accounts at 5% and above, as I often dip down to £0 in the CASH ISA funding RS accounts at the beginning of each month and then replacing said funds as others mature.
I pay circa £13k each month from a Virgin flexible ISA at 4.11% (equivalent to 5.13%) to a third party C/A to cover the RS.
So my threshold for new (and current ) RS is this 5.13%.
On Monday I'll have £50 left in the ISA but that'll get bumped up to circa £12k with maturities this next month.
👍will there be tax to pay from the interested earned from the RS? even though the funds are from a Flexi Cash ISA?1 -
The funds are taxable (if you exceed your own threshold) only for the period its in the RS i.e. not whilst it's within the ISA20122013 said:Pickledonionlover said:
Exactly what I do.PowerSavingMode said:
Yes, indeed.Bridlington1 said:
I must confess I'm running short of spare funds. I currently have a lot of capacity at 6% (driven largely by having Loughborough's 1YSS at 6% gobbling up £2k/mth) which is drawing a lot of funds out of my lower RSs to the point where I am now nibbling into the NatWest/RBS DRSs.clairec666 said:
Yes, I was thinking it had been quiet. Which is quite useful for me actually, because I don't really have the capacity for any extra accounts right now. Hopefully there'll be some good accounts that pop up in January, as my TSB 6% is maturing and their current offer is only 5%.Bridlington1 said:For the RS nerds among you, I thought I'd mention this:
It appears there's been something of a ``RS drought" of late. The eagle-eyed among you might've noticed that that there hasn't been a single RS launched that is eligible to enter p1 of my thread since 14th November.
If I am not mistaken the previous longest gap between eligible RSs being launched was in May, when there were no eligible RSs launched between 15th and 29th May inclusive.
If another RS isn't launched by the end of the month then that'll be the longest I've gone without adding a new RS to the list since I took over the thread, this could well happen given 1st December is Monday and it's rare RSs are launched over the weekend.
Moreover if you look at the accounts that have been added to p1 of the thread in most recent to oldest:
14/11/25- Newcastle & Manchester Festive RSs are branch opening only so most shan't've been able to open them.
11/11/25- The two Skipton RSs exclude those who hold RSs already unless they close their RSs first so I can imagine most shan't've opened them.
10/11/25- Mkt Harborough is branch opening only so again few shall've opened it.
You have to go back to 3rd November before you find a RS being launched that everyone was immediately eligible for and that could be opened online, but even that was only at 5% and its appeal may be limited given that it doesn't allow early withdrawals/closure.
From a mathematical/statistical viewpoint, there will always be natural peaks and troughs in activity throughout the year, but it might also be influenced by the upcoming base rate review.
December's RSs are proving to be a difficult balancing act in my case. I've just about managed to fund my accounts north of 5.5% this month but with next month's maturities I have are only enough to cover those north of 6% and about half of those at 6%. Then there's the complication that the BOE base rate could fall again next month, if it does then I'll be needing to speculate which accounts shall fall and by how much, possibly choosing to fund marginally lower RSs speculatively (as I sometimes did when interest rates were on the rise a few years back).
It's a nice problem to have though.Might I ask if anyone is bothering to fund cash ISAs — whether to fund regular savers or not?
At present, I am mostly using a flexible CASH ISA to fund my regular savers. As a F/T (unpaid) carer now, I only have income from regular savers and as much tax-free income from my small private pension as I can afford, plus occasional income withdrawn from a considerably smaller S&S ISA.
As the equivalent (accessible) savings product with a savings rate to beat the CASH ISA I have is 4.975%, I am wondering whether it is worth bothering transfer out to another flexible ISA with a higher rate (one that offer the equivalent of a 5.525% non-ISA saver -- for now!) as my bonus rate ends mid-Feb 2026. But I think I am overthinking and confusing myself...
Perhaps it makes more sense to just fund save RS accounts at 5% and above, as I often dip down to £0 in the CASH ISA funding RS accounts at the beginning of each month and then replacing said funds as others mature.
I pay circa £13k each month from a Virgin flexible ISA at 4.11% (equivalent to 5.13%) to a third party C/A to cover the RS.
So my threshold for new (and current ) RS is this 5.13%.
On Monday I'll have £50 left in the ISA but that'll get bumped up to circa £12k with maturities this next month.
👍will there be tax to pay from the interested earned from the RS? even though the funds are from a Flexi Cash ISA?
0 -
You pay tax on interest that is earned outside an ISA. You do not pay tax on interest earned within an ISA.20122013 said:Pickledonionlover said:
Exactly what I do.PowerSavingMode said:
Yes, indeed.Bridlington1 said:
I must confess I'm running short of spare funds. I currently have a lot of capacity at 6% (driven largely by having Loughborough's 1YSS at 6% gobbling up £2k/mth) which is drawing a lot of funds out of my lower RSs to the point where I am now nibbling into the NatWest/RBS DRSs.clairec666 said:
Yes, I was thinking it had been quiet. Which is quite useful for me actually, because I don't really have the capacity for any extra accounts right now. Hopefully there'll be some good accounts that pop up in January, as my TSB 6% is maturing and their current offer is only 5%.Bridlington1 said:For the RS nerds among you, I thought I'd mention this:
It appears there's been something of a ``RS drought" of late. The eagle-eyed among you might've noticed that that there hasn't been a single RS launched that is eligible to enter p1 of my thread since 14th November.
If I am not mistaken the previous longest gap between eligible RSs being launched was in May, when there were no eligible RSs launched between 15th and 29th May inclusive.
If another RS isn't launched by the end of the month then that'll be the longest I've gone without adding a new RS to the list since I took over the thread, this could well happen given 1st December is Monday and it's rare RSs are launched over the weekend.
Moreover if you look at the accounts that have been added to p1 of the thread in most recent to oldest:
14/11/25- Newcastle & Manchester Festive RSs are branch opening only so most shan't've been able to open them.
11/11/25- The two Skipton RSs exclude those who hold RSs already unless they close their RSs first so I can imagine most shan't've opened them.
10/11/25- Mkt Harborough is branch opening only so again few shall've opened it.
You have to go back to 3rd November before you find a RS being launched that everyone was immediately eligible for and that could be opened online, but even that was only at 5% and its appeal may be limited given that it doesn't allow early withdrawals/closure.
From a mathematical/statistical viewpoint, there will always be natural peaks and troughs in activity throughout the year, but it might also be influenced by the upcoming base rate review.
December's RSs are proving to be a difficult balancing act in my case. I've just about managed to fund my accounts north of 5.5% this month but with next month's maturities I have are only enough to cover those north of 6% and about half of those at 6%. Then there's the complication that the BOE base rate could fall again next month, if it does then I'll be needing to speculate which accounts shall fall and by how much, possibly choosing to fund marginally lower RSs speculatively (as I sometimes did when interest rates were on the rise a few years back).
It's a nice problem to have though.Might I ask if anyone is bothering to fund cash ISAs — whether to fund regular savers or not?
At present, I am mostly using a flexible CASH ISA to fund my regular savers. As a F/T (unpaid) carer now, I only have income from regular savers and as much tax-free income from my small private pension as I can afford, plus occasional income withdrawn from a considerably smaller S&S ISA.
As the equivalent (accessible) savings product with a savings rate to beat the CASH ISA I have is 4.975%, I am wondering whether it is worth bothering transfer out to another flexible ISA with a higher rate (one that offer the equivalent of a 5.525% non-ISA saver -- for now!) as my bonus rate ends mid-Feb 2026. But I think I am overthinking and confusing myself...
Perhaps it makes more sense to just fund save RS accounts at 5% and above, as I often dip down to £0 in the CASH ISA funding RS accounts at the beginning of each month and then replacing said funds as others mature.
I pay circa £13k each month from a Virgin flexible ISA at 4.11% (equivalent to 5.13%) to a third party C/A to cover the RS.
So my threshold for new (and current ) RS is this 5.13%.
On Monday I'll have £50 left in the ISA but that'll get bumped up to circa £12k with maturities this next month.
👍will there be tax to pay from the interested earned from the RS? even though the funds are from a Flexi Cash ISA?
Hence why taxable interest is multiplied my 0.8, and non-taxable interest by 1.25 to obtain the non-taxable/taxable equivalent (assuming basic rate tax)
I consider myself to be a male feminist. Is that allowed?3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.9K Spending & Discounts
- 246.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


