We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Care - 12 months free?
Options

Baldytyke88
Posts: 511 Forumite

I have read that the last 12 months of life, care is free, but the information around this seems unclear.
A 97-year-old relation had a few health issues this year and it was decided that he should move into a care home, as family could not cope.
Last month a doctor said that he is unlikely to live another 12 months, he is very frail, cannot walk etc.
0
Comments
-
Where have you seen that it’s free?
medical care is free so if the primary need is medical then someone can qualify for free care.
you seem to be taking about personal care and that is mean tested.
In a nursing home the nursing part would be paid for but the majority - personal care, board and lodging are means tested.
0 -
there are some benefits etc that are paid more quickly / at a higher rate if you have an SR1 form completed (used to be a DS1500)0
-
There is no blanket “the last 12 months is free” because no one ever knows how long someone has left. That link you posted doesn’t mention 12 months.
Social care is based on a financial assessment.If someone has complex nursing needs Then there is the CHC nursing assessment, and for some people that does give free care, but that’s based only on the severity and complexity of the health needs, not on timescales. Someone simply dying of old age, even with mobility issues, dementia et cetera is unlikely to qualify for full funding.You may be thinking of the CHC fast track process which applies to someone whose condition is deteriorating rapidly, but you’re talking weeks rather than months there.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
elsien said:You may be thinking of the CHC fast track process which applies to someone whose condition is deteriorating rapidly, but you’re talking weeks rather than months there.
I think that is it, there needs to be some sort of diagnosis of a terminal illness. Although it would be fairer if everyone got 12 months free.
0 -
Baldytyke88 said:elsien said:You may be thinking of the CHC fast track process which applies to someone whose condition is deteriorating rapidly, but you’re talking weeks rather than months there.
I think that is it, there needs to be some sort of diagnosis of a terminal illness. Although it would be fairer if everyone got 12 months free.
And, if there is 12 months free per person, assume that something happens in childhood requiring care, but they come through it - if they then need care later in life they would start from zero... which doesn't seem quite 'fair'.
Don't get me wrong, I do wish your relative well and hope all goes well. And you can tell a lot about a society by how they look after their very young and their very old. However, this is the world we live in, and costs need to be paid...1 -
elsien said:There is no blanket “the last 12 months is free” because no one ever knows how long someone has left.0
-
And how exactly do you anticipate that that would work/be agreed to by the relevant authorities?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.2 -
Baldytyke88 said:elsien said:You may be thinking of the CHC fast track process which applies to someone whose condition is deteriorating rapidly, but you’re talking weeks rather than months there.
I think that is it, there needs to be some sort of diagnosis of a terminal illness. Although it would be fairer if everyone got 12 months free.
normally it take many months for an assessment, this is just speeding it up in urgent cases.
some people do think this is unfair I.e. if you have cancer it might be free but if you have Alzheimer’s it probably isn’t.
If you were very ill in hospital then your feeding, washing, physio etc. would be taken care of.
chc is for nhs care but in a nursing home setting rather than a hospital.
people who want it to be “free” are just putting the costs onto the tax payer and we don’t see anyone volunteering to pay this tax.
personally I feel it’s fairer coming out of houses no longer needed and inheritances rather than from younger working people who are mostly more hard pressed than those with homes they no longer need.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards