We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
tenants in common to joint tenants
bumpergirl
Posts: 22 Forumite
My children are going to reverse their recent decision to change to tenants in common. they now see the pitfalls re CGT and using up NRB on first death. On the form you have to state why you are changing your minds - has anyone experienced this - is there going to be a problem?
0
Comments
-
They should really look at their wills not changing ownership. The standard approach is that their wills create an immediate post death interest trust on the first death. This puts the legal ownership of deceased spouses share in trust but the beneficial ownership is with the surviving spouse. This does not use any of the transferable NRBs as it is still covered by spousal exemption, and does not create a CGT liability for the eventual beneficiaries either.
This protects both the security of the surviving spouse and the eventually beneficiaries (remaindermen) in the event of the surviving spouse remarrying and care costs although hopefully the survivor will have enough assets to self fund as long as they need without having to rely on cash strapped LAs.2 -
thanks for your reply KP - do you mean they should each change their Will to leave everything to each other in trust for life with children eventually inheriting??0
-
Well I don’t know what their current will say, but if they have both left half the house to their children absolutely then that is a rather bad idea for several reasons. If there is no cause in the wills giving the surviving spouse a life interest then they definitely need new ones, and ones drawn up by a solicitor not DIY or an unregulated will writing company.bumpergirl said:thanks for your reply KP - do you mean they should each change their Will to leave everything to each other in trust for life with children eventually inheriting??1 -
Are you talking about siblings or siblings plus their respective spouses/partners?bumpergirl said:My children are going to reverse their recent decision to change to tenants in common. they now see the pitfalls re CGT and using up NRB on first death. On the form you have to state why you are changing your minds - has anyone experienced this - is there going to be a problem?
The position on IHT is different depending on if they're married (which would be illegal for siblings).0 -
sorry - should have said 'son and his wife'Emmia said:
Are you talking about siblings or siblings plus their respective spouses/partners?bumpergirl said:My children are going to reverse their recent decision to change to tenants in common. they now see the pitfalls re CGT and using up NRB on first death. On the form you have to state why you are changing your minds - has anyone experienced this - is there going to be a problem?
The position on IHT is different depending on if they're married (which would be illegal for siblings).0 -
another thought could be to keep tenants in common and simply make a new will leaving everything to spouse, which overrides everything. Is that possible?0
-
Yes it is.bumpergirl said:another thought could be to keep tenants in common and simply make a new will leaving everything to spouse, which overrides everything. Is that possible?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

