We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fit for Purpose
Options

Scotkirkie
Posts: 1 Newbie
I have a Beko Washer/Dryer, bought in John Lewis and the dryer broke last April. This was fixed under the 2 year warranty but the dryer has broken again. But the 2 year warranty ran out in October (wouldn't you know it). Beko say that their repair was only guaranteed for 3 months.
Question therefore is whether the Washer/Dryer is Fit for Purpose, when I would argue that a Washer/Dryer should last 10 years. Can I reasonably set out that under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 that they must either repair or replace the machine. And does MSE have a template letter on this issue.
Any help on where I stand would be helpful
Question therefore is whether the Washer/Dryer is Fit for Purpose, when I would argue that a Washer/Dryer should last 10 years. Can I reasonably set out that under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 that they must either repair or replace the machine. And does MSE have a template letter on this issue.
Any help on where I stand would be helpful
0
Comments
-
As it's over six months since you bought it, you might have to get an independent report done. Find a local domestic appliance repair company to come and have a look at it.
Come on you Irons0 -
The aspect you'd be questioning is if it is sufficiently durable, not if it's fit for purpose.
You can reasonably request that they repair or replace the drying *if* you can demonstrate that the failure is due to a fault in the design or build of the machine. To do this you'll need a report from some kind of independent expert (e.g. a washing machine repairman). This will probably cost something.
If you can demonstrate this, then they should a) pay for the report and b) repair or replace the machine (or, if they decide they can't or it's too expensive, refund you). They're allowed 1 attempt at this (which they've already had) before you're allowed to insist on a refund.
However, if they (or you) choose refund, they're allowed to reduce the amount for the time you've had the machine. There's no clear ruling on how they should pro-rata this, but a commonly used figure is 6 years. So as you've had it for a little over 2 years, you might expect to get 60% back.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards