Reverse Life Insurance?

Hello, does anyone know of a ‘alternative life insurance’ which pays out if you are still alive in say 20 years time at 80, or even 30 years time at 90. The idea being that I could spend more money now, because I did not need to allow for post 90 expenses?

Comments

  • Trentenders
    Trentenders Posts: 1,273 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sounds like you need a pension 
  • Peter999_2
    Peter999_2 Posts: 1,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It's known as an endowment
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It's known as an endowment
    An endowment was effectively a decreasing term assurance bundled with an investment.

    Whilst endowments no longer exist in the mainstream, you could still build an equivalent but instead you would use the stocks and shares ISA wrapper or the pension wrapper for the investment side and use a decreasing term assurance for the life assurance side.

    Top age would be limited in a decreasing term assurance but you could replace it with a non-investment linked whole of life assurance (available with monthly premiums or single premium).

    But as 
    Trentenders says higher up, using the pension wrapper in earlier life to pay for later life is by far the most cost effective option.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 17,185 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hello, does anyone know of a ‘alternative life insurance’ which pays out if you are still alive in say 20 years time at 80, or even 30 years time at 90. The idea being that I could spend more money now, because I did not need to allow for post 90 expenses?
    that was a blend of two products, decreasing life and an investment. They heavily fell out of favour after many of the investments didnt achieve the level of return anticipated and so instead it was decided its better to buy the two components independently rather than be stuck with whichever investment vehicle the insurer chose
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.