We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Argument of payment of repair invoice
Options

Helpalwaysneeded
Posts: 1 Newbie
in Motoring
We are a lease company (A)
We leased out a batch of vehicles to our Customer (B)
(B) sublet the vehicles to their customer (C)
(A) & (B) were not aware there was any damage and/or authorised any works to be carried out.
(C) has taken the vehicles to their repairer for works. (C) already owe a very large sum of money to their repairer.
(A) has requested the return of the vehicles as they are on lease to (A) from a supplier. The repairer is holding the vans hostage until (A), (B) or (C) pay.
Can the repairer do this as they are not (C)'s vehicles to authorise the repairs in the first place and the repairers invoice is made out to (C).
If (A) do not return the vehicles, they are at risk of losing further vehicles and business.
Any advice would be appreciated
We leased out a batch of vehicles to our Customer (B)
(B) sublet the vehicles to their customer (C)
(A) & (B) were not aware there was any damage and/or authorised any works to be carried out.
(C) has taken the vehicles to their repairer for works. (C) already owe a very large sum of money to their repairer.
(A) has requested the return of the vehicles as they are on lease to (A) from a supplier. The repairer is holding the vans hostage until (A), (B) or (C) pay.
Can the repairer do this as they are not (C)'s vehicles to authorise the repairs in the first place and the repairers invoice is made out to (C).
If (A) do not return the vehicles, they are at risk of losing further vehicles and business.
Any advice would be appreciated
0
Comments
-
What do your vehicle lease terms and conditions state about sub leasing and responsibility for repairs?They are ultimately the property of the company that you lease them from, I imagine that company will also have clauses about sub leasing, have you breached those by allowing the vehicles to be further sub let twice?
In the end the repairer needs to be paid whoever authorised the work, the legalities of their not releasing the vehicles until they are paid is something you need to establish. Maybe take some legal advice.1 -
It is understandable that the repairer will seek to put a lien on the cars until the repairs are paid for. It does not look like they will be paid otherwise. With respect to authorising the repairs, I would expect that, as with all such arrangements, there is an obligation to return the cars in good condition. If there is damage, how do you expect that to happen unless the company that leased them arranges for repairs? This is perfectly normal and does not lend any weight to your argument.
I would suggest that you not get involved in the argument with the repairer (no point in making this your problem) but just pursue the company that leased the cars from you for their return.0 -
As a business you need to talk to your legal team that drafted the T/C of the lease. Then engage them further to chase for any monies owed.
Life in the slow lane1 -
Helpalwaysneeded said:If (A) do not return the vehicles, they are at risk of losing further vehicles and business.1
-
eskbanker said:Helpalwaysneeded said:If (A) do not return the vehicles, they are at risk of losing further vehicles and business.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards