We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Taxing of State Pension
KevinG
Posts: 2,132 Forumite
Not sure whether this is the right forum but I had to get this off my chest. I did my SA Tax Return online and reported the amount of State Pension I had received during the tax year (my pension started during 2023/24). I knew I would owe tax due to bank interest and when I submitted the return the figure owing agreed exactly with what I expected. But the amount they showed I owed was £105 higher and when I received the calculation in the post, sure enough the pension figure (including my company pension) was £525 higher. After a long conversation on the phone it was established that the discrepancy was in the State Pension part and the reason for this is that they take the weekly amount and multiply it by the number of weeks I was entitled to it during the year (21, as it happens) and use that figure, irrespective of whether I had actually received the money during the tax year. (They actually rounded up the number of pounds, which they shouldn't do, but that's only cost me 25p.) This is madness! Surely it's far simpler to use the actual payments made. This money is now lost forever as in future years I will be taxed on 52 or 53 weeks pension, irrespective of what I receive and declare on the Tax Return. Stupid system.
2kWp Solar PV - 10*200W Kioto, SMA Sunny Boy 2000HF, SSE facing, some shading in winter, 37° pitch, installed Jun-2011, inverter replaced Sep-2017 AND Feb-2022.
0
Comments
-
What State Pension you received is totally irrelevant.KevinG said:Not sure whether this is the right forum but I had to get this off my chest. I did my SA Tax Return online and reported the amount of State Pension I had received during the tax year (my pension started during 2023/24). I knew I would owe tax due to bank interest and when I submitted the return the figure owing agreed exactly with what I expected. But the amount they showed I owed was £105 higher and when I received the calculation in the post, sure enough the pension figure (including my company pension) was £525 higher. After a long conversation on the phone it was established that the discrepancy was in the State Pension part and the reason for this is that they take the weekly amount and multiply it by the number of weeks I was entitled to it during the year (21, as it happens) and use that figure, irrespective of whether I had actually received the money during the tax year. (They actually rounded up the number of pounds, which they shouldn't do, but that's only cost me 25p.) This is madness! Surely it's far simpler to use the actual payments made. This money is now lost forever as in future years I will be taxed on 52 or 53 weeks pension, irrespective of what I receive and declare on the Tax Return. Stupid system.
It's the entitlement amount that is taxable. Which in this case could have been rounded down to exactly 21 weeks, in your favour.0 -
You're right, that explains it, but it doesn't stop it being uterly stupid and in no way was it "in my favour." Income should be taxed based on when you receive it, like everything else.Dazed_and_C0nfused said:
What State Pension you received is totally irrelevant.KevinG said:Not sure whether this is the right forum but I had to get this off my chest. I did my SA Tax Return online and reported the amount of State Pension I had received during the tax year (my pension started during 2023/24). I knew I would owe tax due to bank interest and when I submitted the return the figure owing agreed exactly with what I expected. But the amount they showed I owed was £105 higher and when I received the calculation in the post, sure enough the pension figure (including my company pension) was £525 higher. After a long conversation on the phone it was established that the discrepancy was in the State Pension part and the reason for this is that they take the weekly amount and multiply it by the number of weeks I was entitled to it during the year (21, as it happens) and use that figure, irrespective of whether I had actually received the money during the tax year. (They actually rounded up the number of pounds, which they shouldn't do, but that's only cost me 25p.) This is madness! Surely it's far simpler to use the actual payments made. This money is now lost forever as in future years I will be taxed on 52 or 53 weeks pension, irrespective of what I receive and declare on the Tax Return. Stupid system.
It's the entitlement amount that is taxable. Which in this case could have been rounded down to exactly 21 weeks, in your favour.2kWp Solar PV - 10*200W Kioto, SMA Sunny Boy 2000HF, SSE facing, some shading in winter, 37° pitch, installed Jun-2011, inverter replaced Sep-2017 AND Feb-2022.0 -
Not really. You have the option of having your state pension paid weekly, fortnightly or (edited!) four-weekly (and yes, you can change the interval once it's in payment), so it would actually be far harder to change the whole system to cater for tax on receipt rather than the current (perfectly sensible) 'entitlement' basis.KevinG said:Not sure whether this is the right forum but I had to get this off my chest. I did my SA Tax Return online and reported the amount of State Pension I had received during the tax year (my pension started during 2023/24). I knew I would owe tax due to bank interest and when I submitted the return the figure owing agreed exactly with what I expected. But the amount they showed I owed was £105 higher and when I received the calculation in the post, sure enough the pension figure (including my company pension) was £525 higher. After a long conversation on the phone it was established that the discrepancy was in the State Pension part and the reason for this is that they take the weekly amount and multiply it by the number of weeks I was entitled to it during the year (21, as it happens) and use that figure, irrespective of whether I had actually received the money during the tax year. (They actually rounded up the number of pounds, which they shouldn't do, but that's only cost me 25p.) This is madness! Surely it's far simpler to use the actual payments made.KevinG said:This money is now lost forever as in future years I will be taxed on 52 or 53 weeks pension, irrespective of what I receive and declare on the Tax Return. Stupid system.
Don't understand the point you're making. If you've already been taxed on the 'extra' £525 then you won't be taxed on it again, so I can't see what money is now 'lost forever'?
Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!1 -
I had no idea I could choose how often it was paid, I certainly wasn't given the option. We'll have to differ on how sensible it is, to me it is simpler to base it on payments actually made by the DWP. I take your point about the "extra" tax, in the long run it makes no difference.Marcon said:
Not really. You have the option of having your state pension paid weekly, fortnightly or monthly (and yes, you can change the interval once it's in payment), so it would actually be far harder to change the whole system to cater for tax on receipt rather than the current (perfectly sensible) 'entitlement' basis.KevinG said:Not sure whether this is the right forum but I had to get this off my chest. I did my SA Tax Return online and reported the amount of State Pension I had received during the tax year (my pension started during 2023/24). I knew I would owe tax due to bank interest and when I submitted the return the figure owing agreed exactly with what I expected. But the amount they showed I owed was £105 higher and when I received the calculation in the post, sure enough the pension figure (including my company pension) was £525 higher. After a long conversation on the phone it was established that the discrepancy was in the State Pension part and the reason for this is that they take the weekly amount and multiply it by the number of weeks I was entitled to it during the year (21, as it happens) and use that figure, irrespective of whether I had actually received the money during the tax year. (They actually rounded up the number of pounds, which they shouldn't do, but that's only cost me 25p.) This is madness! Surely it's far simpler to use the actual payments made.KevinG said:This money is now lost forever as in future years I will be taxed on 52 or 53 weeks pension, irrespective of what I receive and declare on the Tax Return. Stupid system.
Don't understand the point you're making. If you've already been taxed on the 'extra' £525 then you won't be taxed on it again, so I can't see what money is now 'lost forever'?2kWp Solar PV - 10*200W Kioto, SMA Sunny Boy 2000HF, SSE facing, some shading in winter, 37° pitch, installed Jun-2011, inverter replaced Sep-2017 AND Feb-2022.0 -
Being pedantic (but important as the subject comes up quite a bit on this board) it's 'weekly, fortnightly or four-weekly', NOT 'monthly'.Marcon said:
Not really. You have the option of having your state pension paid weekly, fortnightly or monthly (and yes, you can change the interval once it's in payment)4 -
When I was working I was paid four-weekly. That meant there were usually 13 paydays in a tax year, but occasionally (every 20 years or so), there would be 14 paydays in a tax year, which could lead to you paying a substantial amount more tax one month (although, in our case, the tax code was changed for the following year to spread it out).
This method of taxation at least avoids those "month 14" (or "week 53") type problems0 -
True. Unfortunately the State Pension forecast details available on gov.uk don't help with this as they provide a monthly value despite this not being something you can actually get.p00hsticks said:
Being pedantic (but important as the subject comes up quite a bit on this board) it's 'weekly, fortnightly or four-weekly', NOT 'monthly'.Marcon said:
Not really. You have the option of having your state pension paid weekly, fortnightly or monthly (and yes, you can change the interval once it's in payment)3 -
Thanks both - slip of the brain cells, and have edited!Dazed_and_C0nfused said:
True. Unfortunately the State Pension forecast details available on gov.uk don't help with this as they provide a monthly value despite this not being something you can actually get.p00hsticks said:
Being pedantic (but important as the subject comes up quite a bit on this board) it's 'weekly, fortnightly or four-weekly', NOT 'monthly'.Marcon said:
Not really. You have the option of having your state pension paid weekly, fortnightly or monthly (and yes, you can change the interval once it's in payment)Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!2 -
I have recently been invited to apply for my state pension. I was offered the choice of different payment times.KevinG said:
I had no idea I could choose how often it was paid, I certainly wasn't given the option. We'll have to differ on how sensible it is, to me it is simpler to base it on payments actually made by the DWP. I take your point about the "extra" tax, in the long run it makes no difference.Marcon said:
Not really. You have the option of having your state pension paid weekly, fortnightly or monthly (and yes, you can change the interval once it's in payment), so it would actually be far harder to change the whole system to cater for tax on receipt rather than the current (perfectly sensible) 'entitlement' basis.KevinG said:Not sure whether this is the right forum but I had to get this off my chest. I did my SA Tax Return online and reported the amount of State Pension I had received during the tax year (my pension started during 2023/24). I knew I would owe tax due to bank interest and when I submitted the return the figure owing agreed exactly with what I expected. But the amount they showed I owed was £105 higher and when I received the calculation in the post, sure enough the pension figure (including my company pension) was £525 higher. After a long conversation on the phone it was established that the discrepancy was in the State Pension part and the reason for this is that they take the weekly amount and multiply it by the number of weeks I was entitled to it during the year (21, as it happens) and use that figure, irrespective of whether I had actually received the money during the tax year. (They actually rounded up the number of pounds, which they shouldn't do, but that's only cost me 25p.) This is madness! Surely it's far simpler to use the actual payments made.KevinG said:This money is now lost forever as in future years I will be taxed on 52 or 53 weeks pension, irrespective of what I receive and declare on the Tax Return. Stupid system.
Don't understand the point you're making. If you've already been taxed on the 'extra' £525 then you won't be taxed on it again, so I can't see what money is now 'lost forever'?0 -
...just applied for mine, no option other than 4 weekly....after several phonecalls and an age waiting, finally got it changed to weekly.I am suprised they don't give you an online option to do this???.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
