We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debit card charged incorrect amount issue
Comments
-
Report it as fraud, were you using your phone and does it have tracking to show the journey etc?
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
So I did initially report it as fraud as I lost my card earlier in the day and the amount was so overinflated I thought it must be related to that and someone had my card. They got back to me to say that as the transaction was made using my phone, there’s no security issue.
I do have tracking on my phone via google timeline which shows the journey was around 10-15 minutes.0 -
You’ll get nowhere reporting this as fraud, as you participated in the transaction.
Without a receipt showing a different amount, it is difficult to argue you were charged more than the agreed amount.
i do note that you said it was made contactless for over 200 Euros which I’m sure would be above the limit for a contactless transaction, so did you enter your PIN for this transaction?
Also, as scheme rules differ slightly, was this a Visa or Mastercard used?0 -
It's not the security issue, it's fraudulent that the driver charged you 200 instead of 20!Harambe123 said:So I did initially report it as fraud as I lost my card earlier in the day and the amount was so overinflated I thought it must be related to that and someone had my card. They got back to me to say that as the transaction was made using my phone, there’s no security issue.
I do have tracking on my phone via google timeline which shows the journey was around 10-15 minutes.Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Sorry when I say contactless, it was made using Apple Pay which has no limit and doesn’t need a pin.ChargebackCharlie said:You’ll get nowhere reporting this as fraud, as you participated in the transaction.
Without a receipt showing a different amount, it is difficult to argue you were charged more than the agreed amount.
i do note that you said it was made contactless for over 200 Euros which I’m sure would be above the limit for a contactless transaction, so did you enter your PIN for this transaction?
Also, as scheme rules differ slightly, was this a Visa or Mastercard used?
It was with a Mastercard.
Seems like I’m stuck with the charge as no receipt
such a short journey and I paid basically double the airline fare! 0 -
Lesson learnt. Check the amount is correct on the display screen before holding your device in front of the terminal.1
-
Fraud is when a unknown 3rd party uses your details. As far as banks go.Nasqueron said:Report it as fraud, were you using your phone and does it have tracking to show the journey etc?
In this case you could only dispute as OP made the transaction. Which card regulation's require a receipt for the amount expected. Which would have been the 200 euro's anyway. So no chargeback right.
Not sure how length of trip is going to help, OP could have offered a tip 🤷♀️Or agreed to the charge (which they did anyway by tapping phone)
A receipt would have given OP chance to point out to driver the error, which they should have done anyway on checking amount on screen.
Only hope for Op is to contact taxi firm & hope they can refund.
Life in the slow lane0 -
Paris, by any chance?I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.0
-
The OP says it was a phone contactless payment not card and so there is no requirement for the card pin irrespective of the amount of the transaction, the phone's biometrics are used instead and with iPhone at least they are used on every transaction so it wouldn't help you to realise its a high value transaction.ChargebackCharlie said:i do note that you said it was made contactless for over 200 Euros which I’m sure would be above the limit for a contactless transaction, so did you enter your PIN for this transaction?
Also, as scheme rules differ slightly, was this a Visa or Mastercard used?
Would be €200 if it was a card receipt, in some countries the receipt comes from the meter or, as in London, they are fairly often hand written and so may have shown what the real price was but its a moot point given the OP states they didnt get a receipt.born_again said:
Which card regulation's require a receipt for the amount expected. Which would have been the 200 euro's anyway. So no chargeback right.Not sure how length of trip is going to help, OP could have offered a tip 🤷♀️Or agreed to the charge (which they did anyway by tapping phone)
A receipt would have given OP chance to point out to driver the error, which they should have done anyway on checking amount on screen.
As an aside, find it funny that many London taxi drivers who still do written receipts ask you how much you want them to say it was for (or give it to you blank) if you're dressed in a suit or other business wear assuming you're going to expense it and so add a margin.0 -
Call if theft then, arguing semantics is pointless when OP was a victim. The driver fraudulently, or dishonestly (or of course in error) charged 200 instead of 20. Obviously OP should have seen it on the confirmation when they pay (Google Pay pings me the second I pay with what I just paid, I assume Apple does the same) but they didn't. I have seen similar cases e.g. in a money helper newspaper column where a driver refused cash and did the same scam of moving the decimal place.born_again said:
Fraud is when a unknown 3rd party uses your details. As far as banks go.Nasqueron said:Report it as fraud, were you using your phone and does it have tracking to show the journey etc?
In this case you could only dispute as OP made the transaction. Which card regulation's require a receipt for the amount expected. Which would have been the 200 euro's anyway. So no chargeback right.
Not sure how length of trip is going to help, OP could have offered a tip 🤷♀️Or agreed to the charge (which they did anyway by tapping phone)
A receipt would have given OP chance to point out to driver the error, which they should have done anyway on checking amount on screen.
Only hope for Op is to contact taxi firm & hope they can refund.
The reason why the journey length is important is that a 15 minute taxi ride to the airport would cost X, whether it's €20 or €25 say, OP can show they did that journey. The fact it was €200 is obviously nonsense, nobody tips 1000%. It can help with the case at the FOS if OP sends it to them even if they ultimately reject it, it's better than nothing but bank should not just be saying "tough".Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

