We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Proof of funds transfer?
Comments
-
AML regulations are a legal requirement.They'll be audited annually in this regard. Solicitor carries the can for non compliance. As a professional firm something they'll negate at all costs.Deckie said:
Thanks User1977, the solicitor says that he needs evidence of the final transfers in order to sign off the file before exchange of contracts. I too think it’s just his own policy for completeness rather than it being a legal requirement.user1977 said:Exchange of contracts doesn't have any legal relevance in relation to proving the source of funds being sent later for completion, I suspect this is just the solicitors' own policy to avoid any additional stress/hassle between exchange and completion if there is trouble with the transfers or producing evidence of them.1 -
Thanks Hoenir, is the legal requirement to provide evidence of every transfer of funds or just to provide evidence that the funds exist and the original source?Hoenir said:
AML regulations are a legal requirement.They'll be audited annually in this regard. Solicitor carries the can for non compliance. As a professional firm something they'll negate at all costs.Deckie said:
Thanks User1977, the solicitor says that he needs evidence of the final transfers in order to sign off the file before exchange of contracts. I too think it’s just his own policy for completeness rather than it being a legal requirement.user1977 said:Exchange of contracts doesn't have any legal relevance in relation to proving the source of funds being sent later for completion, I suspect this is just the solicitors' own policy to avoid any additional stress/hassle between exchange and completion if there is trouble with the transfers or producing evidence of them.0 -
In which case, I’d be smiling politely and saying that you can either do the single transfer, or the proof of the transfers, but not both, so in light of that new requirement, you’ll be making individual transfers from the relevant accounts as financially that is a better position for you in any event. Then just proceed to make the transfers in the way that works best for you. (That will not only save you the loss of interest, but also the chaps fee too). List the amounts transferred and the days they have been done, then provide that list to the solicitor once all are done to make it easier for their accounts to track everything down and ensure it get allocated correctly. Also - make sure to do this in ample time so that there is sufficient time to get everything straightened out.Deckie said:
Thanks Pumas, I could make the transfers from the individual savings accounts and cut out the current account and CHAPS payment but the solicitor wants to receive a single payment rather than about 20 over several days due to daily withdrawal limits.pumas said:I made transfers from several accounts, over 2days to the solicitor. To speed things up I also transferred from 'account h', and sent proof of funds, no problem.
The biggest issue here to me is that a requirement is being put on you to have a greater sum than the protection limit in an account for a potentially protracted length of time - and I agree with the person who said this is going to be a policy thing.🎉 MORTGAGE FREE (First time!) 30/09/2016 🎉 And now we go again…New mortgage taken 01/09/23 🏡
Balance as at 01/09/23 = £115,000.00 Balance as at 31/12/23 = £112,000.00
Balance as at 31/08/24 = £105,400.00 Balance as at 31/12/24 = £102,500.00
£100k barrier broken 1/4/25
Balance as at 31/08/25 = £ 95,450.00. Balance as at 31/12/25 = £ 91,100.00
SOA CALCULATOR (for DFW newbies): SOA Calculatorshe/her1 -
I know this works for the proceeds of a sale, for example, but does it work in reverse if the money is funds ahead of a purchase?Deckie said:
Thanks se2020, I didn’t know that.se2020 said:If the bank goes bust the £85k protection is extended to £1million for temporary (max 6mths) higher balances as a result of a property transaction🎉 MORTGAGE FREE (First time!) 30/09/2016 🎉 And now we go again…New mortgage taken 01/09/23 🏡
Balance as at 01/09/23 = £115,000.00 Balance as at 31/12/23 = £112,000.00
Balance as at 31/08/24 = £105,400.00 Balance as at 31/12/24 = £102,500.00
£100k barrier broken 1/4/25
Balance as at 31/08/25 = £ 95,450.00. Balance as at 31/12/25 = £ 91,100.00
SOA CALCULATOR (for DFW newbies): SOA Calculatorshe/her0 -
Thanks EssexHebridean that’s probably how we’ll go.EssexHebridean said:
In which case, I’d be smiling politely and saying that you can either do the single transfer, or the proof of the transfers, but not both, so in light of that new requirement, you’ll be making individual transfers from the relevant accounts as financially that is a better position for you in any event. Then just proceed to make the transfers in the way that works best for you. (That will not only save you the loss of interest, but also the chaps fee too). List the amounts transferred and the days they have been done, then provide that list to the solicitor once all are done to make it easier for their accounts to track everything down and ensure it get allocated correctly. Also - make sure to do this in ample time so that there is sufficient time to get everything straightened out.Deckie said:
Thanks Pumas, I could make the transfers from the individual savings accounts and cut out the current account and CHAPS payment but the solicitor wants to receive a single payment rather than about 20 over several days due to daily withdrawal limits.pumas said:I made transfers from several accounts, over 2days to the solicitor. To speed things up I also transferred from 'account h', and sent proof of funds, no problem.
The biggest issue here to me is that a requirement is being put on you to have a greater sum than the protection limit in an account for a potentially protracted length of time - and I agree with the person who said this is going to be a policy thing.0 -
I’ve not examined it in detail but it says it’s for property transactions - sale or purchase.EssexHebridean said:
I know this works for the proceeds of a sale, for example, but does it work in reverse if the money is funds ahead of a purchase?Deckie said:
Thanks se2020, I didn’t know that.se2020 said:If the bank goes bust the £85k protection is extended to £1million for temporary (max 6mths) higher balances as a result of a property transaction
https://www.fscs.org.uk/making-a-claim/claims-process/temporary-high-balances/
1 -
I recently did similar, it was money for a deposit, I sent statements showing the total in 3 accounts, then transferred it all to one account and sent it to the solicitor, the only fuss I got was off the bank and I had to ring them and convince them I wasn’t an idiot being scammed 🙄. But I had no trouble from the solicitor.Deckie said:Several months ago I provided the solicitor with proof of funds for our purchase including statements showing where the funds came from which he was happy with. The funds are sitting in several accounts for protection and at the appropriate time I will need to transfer them all into one current account to do a CHAPS payment to the solicitor just before completion. For logistical reasons we will need at least 2 weeks between exchange and completion. With only a few weeks to go the solicitor is saying that he also needs to see evidence of the transfers into the current account before exchange of contract.
We’re not very happy with this because funds taken from some accounts cannot be returned if anything happens before completion and having the full amount sitting in a current account for even two weeks will mean hundreds of pounds in lost interest. Albeit a low risk, what happens if the bank goes bust in the period before completion? We lose all the funds apart from the guaranteed £85,000.
Does anyone know whether we legally need to provide evidence of the transfers into the current account, so long before it needs to be paid out? I’m sure the legal requirement is only to provide proof that the funds exist and where they came from. Even if I did provide evidence of the transfers, it doesn’t prove that I won’t be using other dodgy money laundering funds to pay him on the day.0 -
Thanks Horsewithnoname, I sent the statements of the 7 accounts but you didn’t need to send evidence of the transfers to the one account. Your solicitor didn’t mind so I think ours is just trying to cover himself unnecessarily.horsewithnoname said:
I recently did similar, it was money for a deposit, I sent statements showing the total in 3 accounts, then transferred it all to one account and sent it to the solicitor, the only fuss I got was off the bank and I had to ring them and convince them I wasn’t an idiot being scammed 🙄. But I had no trouble from the solicitor.Deckie said:Several months ago I provided the solicitor with proof of funds for our purchase including statements showing where the funds came from which he was happy with. The funds are sitting in several accounts for protection and at the appropriate time I will need to transfer them all into one current account to do a CHAPS payment to the solicitor just before completion. For logistical reasons we will need at least 2 weeks between exchange and completion. With only a few weeks to go the solicitor is saying that he also needs to see evidence of the transfers into the current account before exchange of contract.
We’re not very happy with this because funds taken from some accounts cannot be returned if anything happens before completion and having the full amount sitting in a current account for even two weeks will mean hundreds of pounds in lost interest. Albeit a low risk, what happens if the bank goes bust in the period before completion? We lose all the funds apart from the guaranteed £85,000.
Does anyone know whether we legally need to provide evidence of the transfers into the current account, so long before it needs to be paid out? I’m sure the legal requirement is only to provide proof that the funds exist and where they came from. Even if I did provide evidence of the transfers, it doesn’t prove that I won’t be using other dodgy money laundering funds to pay him on the day.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

