We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Octopus Energy - is it worth trading energy?
Comments
-
And who pays for it ?Energy storage - especially in "electric in electric out" form - is either pretty expensive - and/or inefficient - even at scale. Which is why heat store for central heat is getting research in many nations as an alternative use of solar and low daytime demand generation potential.And iirc the local distribution network is already the least efficient part of the network - losing a multiple of NG voltage levels transmission's losses (by factor of 3 or so iirc in the overall c 8% iirc). Shifting power through part of it twice will only make it even less efficient. Still a loss arguably better than a waste.But there is a reason UK has been doing renewables on the cheap for decades - the shear cost of energy storage.Think how much a domestic battery costs - and multiply to cover currently c14% of homes in some regions already.As long as it's the solar exporters paying via their export rates - feel free to suggest it to the DNOs - space permitting.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards