Land covered by Byelaws - RK liability??

Computersaysno

Land covered by byelaws - specifically Newcastle Airport.

Overstayed in the filling station [100% within the airport boundary covered by the byelaws].

Am I correct in assuming that no RK Liability can attach as it is not 'relevant land'?

And as such they can only chase the driver? 

Computersaysno

Sorry meant to add...

PCN issued by UK Parking P4trol Office ...they have even rejected an appeal wherein the Rk stated that they should pursue the driver. 

They have even offer IAS.

Grizebeck

No keeper liability under pofa.

Gr1pr

Definitely No Keeper liability at airports where bylaws cover it 

Ukppo can definitely pursue the driver, if divulged, but won't know who the driver is UNLESS told by the RK, so dobbed in by the RK

They will assume that the keeper and driver are the same person, despite the court case from last year, as seen on contester legal in the blog there 

Computersaysno

Gr1pr said:

They will assume that the keeper and driver are the same person, despite the court case from last year, as seen on contester legal in the blog there 

Do you have a link to said case as per above??

Computersaysno

Computersaysno said:

Gr1pr said:

They will assume that the keeper and driver are the same person, despite the court case from last year, as seen on contester legal in the blog there 

Do you have a link to said case as per above??

Sorry...found it. 

https://www.contestorlegal.co.uk/blog-3/strategic-win-over-ncp-expertly-defeating-bw-legals-claim-for-unjust-parking-charges-at-southend-county-court

Computersaysno

Actually found a better one [same source]

https://www.contestorlegal.co.uk/blog-3/it-is-inappropriate-for-the-court-to-draw-an-inference-on-the-balance-of-property-that-registered-keeper-was-driving-on-any-given-occasion-the-appeal-court-has-said-naacb

Computersaysno

Here's a story on Bristol Airport...same scenario [except Guardian couldn't see the byelaws boundaries]...

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2024/sep/14/airport-parking-fines-bristol-unenforceable-bylaw 

Umkomaas

IPC operator. They won't stop until they've tried every which way to get you to cough up.  Just stay firm. Could take a while for them to crawl away. 

Computersaysno

Umkomaas said:

IPC operator. They won't stop until they've tried every which way to get you to cough up.  Just stay firm. Could take a while for them to crawl away. 

Is there any way someone could take action against them for their 'harassment' once they have been told 'chase the driver'? 

Surely someone has tried to get compensation via courts?? 

I'd love to give it a go myself...is there a path that's already been trodden??

LDast

No.